58 Scientific Papers Disproving Global Warming

June 7th, 2017 | by Super Admin
58 Scientific Papers Disproving Global Warming
Controversy
16

“Global warming” is a myth — so say 80 graphs from 58 peer-reviewed scientific papers published in 2017.

In other words, the so-called “Consensus” on global warming is a massive lie. And Donald Trump was quite right to quit the Paris agreement which pretended that the massive lie was true.

By “global warming” these papers don’t, of course, mean the mild warming of around 0.8 degrees Celsius that the planet has experienced since the middle of the 19th century as the world crawled out of the Little Ice Age. Pretty much everyone, alarmists and skeptics alike, is agreed on that.

Rather, they mean “global warming” in the sense that is most commonly used today by grant-troughing scientists, and huxter politicians, and scaremongering green activists, and brainwashed mainstream media (MSM) environmental correspondents. “Global warming” as in the scary, historically unprecedented, primarily man-made phenomenon which we must address urgently before the icecaps melt and the Pacific islands disappear beneath the waves and all the baby polar bears drown.

What all these papers argue in their different ways is that the alarmist version of global warming — aka Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) — is a fake artefact.

That is, all these different experts from around the world — China, Russia, Canada, the U.S., Italy, etc. — have been looking closely at different aspects of the global warming puzzle in various regions and on different timescales and come to the conclusion in irreproachable, peer-reviewed scientific ways that there is no evidence to support the global warming scare story.

Late 20th century and early 21st century global warming, they show, is neither dramatic, nor unusual, nor scary.

Here, as collated by Kenneth Richard at No Tricks Zone, are just some of the charts to prove it.

Büntgen et al, below, shows that temperatures in the northern hemisphere were warmer in the early 1400s than they are today

 

Read More

 


source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/06/delingpole-global-warming-is-myth-58-scientific-papers-2017/

  • A_patriot

    I would gladly share this on FB, but I know for a fact that my “politically neutral” niece will just shoot down the source of this article as unreliable. She’s fully brainwashed, hiding behind her Science degree, teaching degree and failure to admit she leans more left than on the center. Oh, well. I guess we need call out those who are professional programmers, no?

  • jong

    One only has to look at the credentials of those supporting supposed “global warming” under what ever name they are calling it. Bill Nye does not stack up what so ever to Dr Happer of the Institute of Advance Studies at Princeton.

    • Gary Smith

      Bill Nye is not a scientisft just a blowhard like Gore

      • jong

        He is more like a religious leader of false “science” and selling snake oil at the same time.

  • Kstar

    A Patriot
    As the Bible of Gods Holy Word says, there are seasons that come and go.
    Genisis 8:22 “While the earth remained, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease”.
    This promise is given here that the seasons of the year will continue forever, because the earth the earth will remain forever. There is no such thing as global warming according to our Heavenly Father God. It’s a sad thing to realize just how indoctrinated these younger generations are by their socialist and commie college professors who are equally indoctrinated as well. A godless society is exactly what these so-called professors are shoving down the throats of these younger people who know nothing about God.
    All you can do Sir is pray that her eyes will be opened to Gods truths and that her heart will be turned to Him.

    • bobbywho

      Well put, plain and simple truth.

  • Luisa Sonnek

    What absolute bunk! Facts please. References please. Why, why, why can’t we win with facts instead of propaganda? If these scientists from all over the world disagree with global warming why have they all signed on to the Paris agreement, have in a very proactive way designed their societies to preserve the earth and taken steps to shift to renewable energy?

    • denoferth

      Might ask you to provide the same “facts” but that might prove very embarrassing especially if we start with your side’s 97 percentile conciseness lie.

      • Luisa Sonnek

        I am not sure what you mean by “your side”. You will not get an argument from me, both sides are a disgrace! I was simply pointing out that if you are going to convince a group of thinking rational people of something using facts that can be backed up with the papers their claims come from and the references, your golden. I am so sick and tired of both sides using lies and flamboyant claims to sell their message as if we are a bunch of uneducated, toothless redneck idiots who are not capable of critical thinking.

        • Mike Egan

          The real issue is that we do not have the ability to predict the future, despite the foaming at the mouth claims that we do. We have historical records that many look at and draw different “conclusions”. There is not agreement in the scientific community on future trends, simply because there are too many variables, and no clear cut answers. We might as well read tea leaves, or have the shaman study the entrails of a chicken. I do not want anyone demanding MY tax dollars from MY pocket to be spent based on this. I’m not alone. If you want documented footnotes, I’ll refer you to over 200 references in Michael Creichton’s book “State of Fear”, a fictional story with real references to back up the plot.

          I would also direct all to re-read the last line of the Serenity prayer (…and the wisdom to know the difference”).

        • Snake

          Your claim that both sides are using lies is what is a disgrace. YOU don’t have the mental wherewithal to see the difference between truth and lies. And your claim that “uneducated, toothless redneck idiots who are not capable of critical thinking” is even more disgusting, in fact, there is no doubt that “uneducated, toothless redneck idiots” are far more capable of critical thinking than you are!

    • Ed Lundgren

      Its all about “MONEY HONEY”..Al Gore all this Global Nonsense after he lost the Presidential race in the 90S. He had lost his Senate seat and had no job to maintain his lifestyle though he wasn’t poor by any means. But Global weather was always the talk around town in those days and with some Washington help $$$$ he influenced a few of his Senate buddies to get funding to study this important event and it took off after a few real Scientist signed up to look into it. [Meaning, get paid] The rest is history..Facts & Figures don’t Lie, just people do and this was a biggy in the lying dept for scientist that made a lot of them rich and gave them a whole new career to “Look into it” [ie] Research!.

    • Jk

      They signed on to the Paris agreement for money – I read it…did you?

  • SED

    We all agree that we should be good stewards of the earth, better now than in the past because of the encroachment of the human race on all f ms of life on earth. The methods how to do that is where we disagree. Those who seek financial gain get the most airtime while those with more logical advise are shot down. If you had any geology 101 time or astronomy 101 you would understand that man only has influence but no control of what is going on in time on this planet.

  • Joe Pewter

    embezzelment of US dollars..like 95% of government programs…local…national…world

  • David Bury

    I really suggest everyone buy and read DARK WINTER by John L Casey (a retired NASA scientist. He demonstrates how changes in the sun is causing a 30 year cold spell which is vastly more dangerous than any warming.