Hillary Gets Stunning News About Illinois Ballots That Could Cost Her the Race

Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton may not be eligible to appear on Illinois’ primary election ballot, at least according to a petition filed with state officials Wednesday by an anti-Hillary political action committee.

The petition filed by the Stop Hillary PAC contended that thousands of the signatures submitted by Hillary Clinton’s campaign to get her name on the state’s primary ballot were ineligible, therefore dropping Hillary’s valid signature total beneath the 3,000 minimum required.

According to the Washington Free Beacon, the petition was filed with the Illinois State Board of Elections by Chicago resident Brant Davis just before the deadline for such a challenge to be presented.

Here’s a statement from Dan Backer, head of the Stop Hillary PAC:

“Hillary Clinton violated rules that even Rod Blagojevich followed. The sheer numbeer of defective registrants is a typical bit of Clinton sloppiness and their usual lack of respect for the law.”

Rod Blagojevich is a corrupt Chicago politician who went to jail years ago for attempting to sell Barack Obama’s former Senate seat, among other things.

Using teams of volunteers, the group painstakingly reviewed more than 500 pages of ballot access signatures provided by Hillary Clinton’s campaign, cross-referencing them with voter registration files and other public records.

 

The Stop Hillary PAC claimed that some of the signatures submitted by Hillary were from unregistered voters, contained incorrect or incomplete addresses, featured illegible writing, were duplicate signatures from the same people, or weren’t properly notarized.

The Illinois State Board of Elections maintains some of the most stringent election regulations and has been known to remove candidates from ballots if they were facing challenges to their eligibility. However, we wouldn’t be surprised if there was some “strong-arming” of this board behind the scenes to stop this challenge by the Clinton campaign, the Illinois Democratic Party, and/or the Democratic National Committee.

Do you think this challenge to Hillary’s ballot eligibility will keep her off the ballot, or will it be business as usual for the corrupt Clinton camp?

423 COMMENTS

      • I still do not believe that he really — WON — ! THERE was a lot of – shit going on at that time. I do not trust – Obama – or Washington.

    • WE are hoping that you are correct, although communism has been dead for decades. You fascists need to learn the meaning behind the terms Nazi, fascist, socialist democratic socialism, Christian socialism and neo conservative. I read an article in the Washington Post not long ago, attempting to educate the ignorant guilty, that is based on the right wing dummies who don’t know the difference. Now can you say Madame President fascist?

      • h m Rowland, I can’t say it and never will. The people have spoken and they don’t want a Clintoon in the WH ever again! It’s funny how you libtards overlook her stealing china, silver, and paintings from the WH on her last departure showing her total lack of character, honesty, morals and outright disregard for doing what’s right! And you want to disregard Benghazi and the lives she lost because of her incompetence? How about the now proven top secret emails on her private server? That’s OK with you, too? Now we find out her name being included in the balloting was fraudulent! What does it take for you to understand she is a fraud, a criminal and a liar! She should be in prison, never in the White House!!!

        • The same china stealing story was told when ….uh….what was her name ? Little g’s wife….the one who killed her boyfriend with the car, ummmm oh Laura, Laura Bush. I prefer thieves over the fascism of the right. No war is just, no bullet has a target by nature, and peace should be our ultimate goal for each other and future generations if climate change allows there to be a future generation. Your people took over the country in ’63 and are still in power what are you complaining about?

          • h m Rowland: A little education for you:

            Jerry Zeifman, the man who served as chief counsel to the House Judiciary Committee during the Watergate hearings, has tried to tell the story of his former staffer’s behavior during those proceedings for years. Zeifman claims he fired Hillary for unethical behavior and that she conspired to deny Richard Nixon counsel during the hearings:
            As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.
            ADVERTISEMEN
            The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergat Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.
            Why?
            “Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
            This isn’t exactly news. When her lachrymose performance arguably won her New Hampshire, Zeifman tried to tell people about Hillary’s duplicity. Patterico noticed the effort, but few others picked it up. Zeifman wrote at his website:
            After hiring Hillary, Doar assigned her to confer with me regarding rules of procedure for the impeachment inquiry. At my first meeting with her I told her that Judiciary Committee Chairman Peter Rodino, House Speaker Carl Albert, Majority Leader “Tip” O’Neill, Parliamentarian Lou Deschler and I had previously all agreed that we should rely only on the then existing House Rules, and not advocate any changes. I also quoted Tip O’Neill’s statement that: “To try to change the rules now would be politically divisive. It would be like trying to change the traditional rules of baseball before a World Series.”
            Hillary assured me that she had not drafted, and would not advocate, any such rules changes. However, as documented in my personal diary, I soon learned that she had lied. She had already drafted changes, and continued to advocate them. In one written legal memorandum, she advocated denying President Nixon representation by counsel. In so doing she simply ignored the fact that in the committee’s then most recent prior impeachment proceeding, the committee had afforded the right to counsel to Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas.
            When Bill Clinton was president, he allowed Hillary to assume authority over a health care reform. Even after threats and intimidation, she couldn’t even get a vote in a democratic controlled congress. This fiasco cost the American taxpayers about $13 million in cost for studies, promotion, and other efforts.

            Then President Clinton gave Hillary authority over selecting a female attorney general. Her first two selections were Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood – both were forced to withdraw their names from consideration. Next she chose Janet Reno – husband Bill described her selection as “my worst mistake.” Some may not remember that Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh and the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco, Texas resulting in dozens of deaths of women and children.

            Husband Bill allowed Hillary to make recommendations for the head of the Civil Rights Commission. Lani Guanier was her selection. When a little probing led to the discovered of Ms. Guanier’s radical views, her name had to be withdrawn from consideration.

            Apparently a slow learner, husband Bill allowed Hillary to make some more recommendations. She chose former law partners Web Hubbel for the Justice Department, Vince Foster for the White House staff, and William Kennedy for the Treasury Department. Her selections went well: Hubbel went to prison, Foster (presumably) committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.

            Many younger votes will have no knowledge of “Travelgate.” Hillary wanted to award unfettered travel contracts to Clinton friend Harry Thompson – and the White House Travel Office refused to comply. She managed to have them reported to the FBI and fired. This ruined their reputations, cost them their jobs, and caused a thirty-six month investigation. Only one employee, Billy Dale was charged with a crime, and that of the enormous crime of mixing personal and White House funds. A jury acquitted him of any crime in less than two hours.

          • a little more education for you h m Rowland:

            Still not convinced of her ineptness, Hillary was allowed to recommend a close Clinton friend, Craig Livingstone, for the position of Director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of about 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies
            (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, suddenly Hillary and the president denied even knowing Livingstone, and of course, denied knowledge of drug use in the White House. Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.

            Next, when women started coming forward with allegations of sexual harassment and rape by Bill Clinton, Hillary was put in charge of the “bimbo eruption” and scandal defense. She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit. After the Starr investigation they settled with Ms. Jones.

            She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr’s investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs.

            Hillary’s devious game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to practice law for ‘lying under oath’ to a grand jury and then his subsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.

            Hillary avoided indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice during the Starr investigation by repeating, “I do not recall,” “I have no recollection,” and “I don’t know” a total of 56 times while under oath.

            After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork that she had stolen.

            What a swell party – ready for another four or eight year of this type low-life mess?

            Now we are exposed to the destruction of possibly incriminating emails while Hillary was Secretary of State and the “pay to play” schemes of the Clinton Foundation – we have no idea what shoe will fall next.
            But to her loyal fans – “what difference does it make?”

            Electing Hillary Clinton president would be like granting Satan absolution and giving him the keys to heaven!
            Before any Regurgicrats say anything, yes I have posted this before and will again as often as necessary. Many have complained but none to date have proven any of these facts wrong.

          • Thank you for all the info. As aside note before I respond it is incredible that few people see the ‘Watergate’ affair as a connection to the coup in Dallas in
            ’63. Anyway, my point in stating what I did about the same story being told about Laura BBBBush back in the day was to say that its all the same. Your response and attempt to sway me from Hillary, which I never stated that I am supporting, has supported my original post in that I could set here and type pages about the corruption of illegal acts1 of any given politician. I guess what it comes down to is ….they all steal the china.

          • As to that “coup in Dallas” that was carried out by the Mafia, not the GOP… some people you don’t make “campaign promises” too and NOT deliver! They have their own “method” of dealing with “breach of contract” as John and Bobbie BOTH found out!

          • Oh it wasn’t the GOP but it was orchestrated by far right fascist war lovin’ money rackin’ factions of the CIA/Military and the CIA asset, the mafia as you say. It was not a murder about the mafia, it was about Kennedy making peace instead of war, shame on him. The government that many ignorant seem to think we have today is the government of 1962 are surely mistaken, the not so invisible government is still making policy and pulling the strings of presidents. Much of what citizens complain about needs to be laid at the door step in Langley and not on Pennsylvania Ave. The republican candidates of today speak with the same Cold War words of the men who murdered not only JFK but many other men of peace…..there is no money in peace, have you noticed that we don’t even speak the word anymore? Its an antiquated concept because we are molded and lead by propaganda. We should assume that we are being told a cover story no matter what the subject such as Scalia’s natural death and the bombing in San Bernardino.

          • While I’ll grant that that are many CONTRIVED events, JFK was killed by the mafia for betraying them in several ways. And while LBJ and others were involved in the cover up which included SOME GOP ( like the ONLY man ever APPOINTED too the Presidency, a member of the Warren Commission, Gerald Ford; I’m not aware of any GOP conspiracy.

          • If you mean that the mafia were the shooters I might agree at least one of them. If you mean that it was a plot by the mafia then you and Gaton just go on peddling that tale if it helps you sleep at night. Actually the story of the JFK murder and the coup begins back during the Truman administration, he certainly made a mistake in trusting the evil Allen Dulles and rebuked his own actions and called for the reigning in of the CIA 30 days after Kennedy was murdered. Truth sometimes comes from where you don’t expect it. Jack Ruby, when asked about the assassination responded,” a whole other form of government will take over this country”, he was telling us the truth. He was injected with a rapid forming cancer and died 6 months later. It was the same cancer prepared for Castro by Dr. Oschner and his group. Just a side note, it was Dr.Oshner’s cancer that tainted the small pox vaccines given to us as school children, mistakenly tainted but never pulled or cleaned up. If you are interested in that subject and its ties to the coup read “Dr. Mary’s Monkey” and “Me and Lee” by Judyth Vary Baker who worked with Lee Oswald in that research in New Orleans. Dr. Mary Sherman was blown up and burned for her knowledge, its a movie now too I believe but the research is better.

          • There are over 2600 titles on this subject in print perhaps you’ll try another. Perhaps Mark Lane “Rush To Judgement or James W. Douglas “JFK and the Unspeakable, why he died and why it matters”. I have the book that you speak of and I keep it in the case with the disinformation titles. I have been able to find and read/study around 8 titles plus the fiction 26 volumes of the Warren Report.

          • You are most welcome. Hopefully, it was an invaluable learning experience for you. Now your comment regarding the “Watergate” affair as a connection to the coup in Dallas in 63. I can assure you there is no connection!!! I can say that because: My next door neighbor in Dallas the Dallas police officer by the name of Bobby Hargis. If you have viewed the Zapruder film, Bobby is the officer on the motorcycle immediately behind the Kennedy limo. Next: I was an officer with the Dallas Sheriff’s Office in the early 70’s and my training officer and partner was an officer by the name of Dante Flanagan. He was one of the officers assigned to guard Jack Ruby during his last days in Parkland Hospital dying of lung cancer. Because of my personal relationship with these two officers, I have insight that few others have. The Warren Commission was a stage act. Many have written about the Kennedy assassination but none are accurate. It is your business who you support and vote for but I would advise you become more informed about the facts as that makes you a much better voter and citizen.

          • Oh yes I know about Officer Hargis, he was behind the limo on the left side and according to his interviews he was hit with blood and brain splatter which of course excludes a shot from the TSBD. I have studied the coup since I was 12 as a matter of daily exercise, I was 8 at the time, so around 47 years of in depth research. I assure you that it was an overthrow of our government from which we have yet to recover. The hawkish words of the republican candidates during the New Hampshire debates shows us that the fascists are alive and still running thngs, they sounded like the cold War military that had their hand in bringing down a man who would dare speak of and take action toward peace without guns or bombs….the very idea! Jeb Bush told us twice that evening that he is supported by the military industrial complex and without apology, and spoke of ‘first strike against North Korea which Kennedy blocked in favor of life on our small planet. I suppose when your grand father is Prescott the Nazi and Poppy who was connected in some aspect to the coup it just seems normal to brag that you are supported by the evil invisible government . I would recommend to you a grand body of research by James W. Douglas, “JFK and the Unspeakable, why he died and why it matters”, is written from a historical prospective and makes the obvious clearly obvious. Seriously excellent and I think with your background that you would enjoy it. Mr Douglas, historian writes in a comparative style beginning with the actions of Thomas Merton at the time and is woven through the work, fascinating. I posses near 800 volumes on the subject out of the 2600+ that are out there. I have taken 3 groups of college students to the National Achieves for research purposes on this topic, any lone nutters going in don’t hold that ridiculous idea for very long. I would really like to talk to you and hear you about what you have learned to which most of us are not privy. I guess we don’t agree on the coup but I am always willing to learn, my mind stays open even though I can see the effects of the event right outside my window, it is why we are in the mess we are in today, this event and the other 3 big murder/assassinations of the ’60’s, as well as the Wellstone/Kennedy Jr. murders and 9/11 just to mention a few actions of our far right fascist government in hiding. Peace isn’t a money maker, speak its name and get your head blown off. Fascism- a government whose economy is based on going to war, money over human value. There are many interviews with your old neighbor the late Officer Bobby Hargis on YouTube if you have an interest. I watch the “four Horseman” over and over again. He seems like a good man who made good choices to enable him to stay alive. …who can slight him for that, although many chose to tell the truth and die. Thanks for sharing sir.

          • I am pleased to hear that you have dedicated so much of your life on this subject. I got to know Bobby pretty well as my wife provided childcare for their newly adopted baby. Bobby confided some things that I was sworn to secrecy to and will never break that promise. There were things he would not reveal as he put it for my own well being. He was a good man and was very smart in many ways. He knew what to say and what not to say in those public interviews. Yes, when we met almost ten years later, he was still fearful for not only himself but his family. I always knew he was very careful and very protective of those he cared about. We lived in a Dallas suburb in an apartment complex. Bobby was the head of security in that complex and knew what was going on there 24-7. Notice he and his wife both had good incomes and they chose to live outside the city of Dallas and did not own a house. That was a clue to me I will not divulge information that I promised not to divulge from Bobby or from Dante regarding his personal conversations with Jack Ruby. You may have already done your research but if not, I would suggest some things. First, Joe Kennedy Sr. made certain promises to get his son voted into the presidency. Know what they were. Once elected, both of his sons broke those promises which really upset these people. Next was the handling of the early stages of Vietnam having our troops there in a “supervisory” role carrying arms but with no ammunition to defend themselves. I know this fact because I was a medical corpsman during that time and participated in the treatment of these young men. Then we move on to the Cuban Blockade. Who were the people that benefited politically from that dog and pony show? I saw U-2 photos that proved the whole event was staged. Now we move on to the Bay of Pigs invasion. Who was hung out to dry on that? Next is Lee Harvey Oswald, Who was he really working for and why? Now we get to Jack Ruby. What were his ties to Castro and what inside help did he get from the Dallas PD to get to Oswald? Were there federal government agencies involved? yes, at least two. It is obvious who they were and why, Now throw into the mix Mr. Hoover of the FBI and some of JFK’s ladies and you have quite a mix of strange bedfellows. Martin Luther King is another mystery. I have no useful information on that but have suspicions that he may have been working for unknown organizations and knew too much. A coup, maybe, but it was not just our government. Ted Kennedy full understood that and he chose not to put his life on the line. He joined the political corruption of his day and his love for the girls also put him at risk. As you know, the 60’s was a time when organized crime ruled the political arena and they took no prisoners. This is about all I am willing to reveal. You may agree with some or all but that choice is obviously yours to make. I will close by saying that I do not believe LBJ was directly involved. A crooked politician beyond he pale. Another interesting story about Lady Bird and her ties to a company by the name of Brown and Root which later became Halliburton. A fortune was made in Vietnam when orders come down to the military that all
            construction projects were to be awarded to Brown and Root. I appreciate your perspective and thank you for sharing.

          • MOST of US are far LESS concerned about the consequences of potential (and perhaps UNAVOIDABLE) climate change than we are about the GREAT depression we appear to be on the door step of or the catastrophic effects of the power grid or our water supply OR BOTH being attacked by the terrorists your Muslim and the nasty vote whoring incompetent who wants to be “next” can’t bring in fast enough!

          • Well when we are underwater then none of it will matter. You can’t have circus without a tent. You can’t sell real estate,(not that it’s a legal commodity)if its underwater. The Bush family has been buying up water rights all over the world as they and many of their cohorts are all for contaminating what water we now have. 150,000 penguins have died as an ice mass has floated into block them from water. Its a grave situation and no matter who we think causes or doesn’t cause it it is happening and without land we are all sunk. Don’t be so patriotic that it blinds you from understanding that all of our enemies are created by those who really run or government…they must provide us with something to fear or we are uncontrollable. Fear creates a perceived need to fight back which is what they want …there is much money to be made by the rich in war toys and accessories. Those who feel the need to protect and fear play into the hands of the evil far right fascists who run the world. Shhhh….don’t say peace, you’ll get your head blown off.
            You missed the point of my post. I was saying that there are crazy stories true or not about everyone in public life some may be true and some not. I imagine someone will say that Michelle Obama took the White House china next January…that was the point.

        • Exactly. Hillary belongs to Jail. I suggest keep GITMO open. Reserve a cell for her and Bill. Not necessarily the same cell. And another cell for Obama. and the rest of the cell should be shared with the democrats and RINOS.

      • Ah, Mr Rowland, we meet again. In reference to your mention of Christian socialism, you must be talking about the Jim Wallises of the world. If you’re familiar with your Bible, you realize that nowhere in the scriptures did God state we are to turn our money over to any government and depend on it to judge who to help and how much of our resources to confiscate to accomplish that. The church has always done a better job of it than the government. As you know, the good Samaritan wasn’t instructed to leave the man lying in the road while he ran to consult the Roman govt about what to do. He was to help the man himself. Works much better that way.

        • Yes I agree. If that actually happened in the world then the government would have no need to act. It Seems that Christians today spend more time hating and feeling superior to bend and help another. I know that many do act in kindness and I also know non Christians who act in kindness but they are not doing it for a heavenly reward. I wasn’t choosing and ‘ism’ I was just listing a few.

      • Can you say Adios? Oh and keep your MADAME in the CAT HOUSE where she belongs! We’ve had it with you self proclaimed “progressives” PIMPING our nation! Now kindly return to reading your celebrations of your self supposed intellectual superiority and remember that MOST of your party’s voter base is comprised of those individuals exactly like the “intellectuals” who looted and burned Ferguson, Missouri in the name of “justice” for a big, dead thug!

        • Gee you are repeating the words of Cold War propaganda form the fascist military and CIA of the ’60’s. The propaganda at that time when Kennedy was using dialogue to keep us from nuclear annihilation was that he was ‘pimping’, selling us out to the Soviets. Dialouge certainly worked, no bombs required. Sheep and history repeats itself. I am always proud of those who stand against injustice and so does anyone with patriotic blood, a belief in the constitution, and willingness to look evil in the face and say ‘enough’!! I don’t support the act of looting but I respect the platform, no different than those cowboy patriots out west. Humanity requires compassion and understanding and standing together against the invisible government and its military and its police and any other thing that is thrown at us to swallow and accept. Those human beings to which you refer are fighting for the same thing you are, to be treated in a human way as all men are created equal and do not deserve to be treated as less than that. Are you saying to me that you are willing to stand for the murder of the innocent?

        • snuffum – Even if tried and convicted, Hillary would never spend time in a real prison. She would be sent to a facility like the federal prison at Maxwell AFB, Alabama; commonly known as “The Alabama Country Club.” They are prisons designed for politicians BY politicians.
          Several years ago a major network completed an investigation of a similar facility. Here’s some of their findings.
          1. “Prisoners” live in 2000 square-foot cottages, not 10 X 10 prison cells.
          2. Each cottage has multiple telephone lines with free, unlimited long distance.
          3. Prisoners families have the option of living with the prisoners.
          4. Prisoners wear tailor made clothing instead of prison uniforms: all at taxpayer expense.
          5. Meals are prepared by gourmet chefs instead of standard cafeteria cooks.
          6. Prisoners perform no duties such as KP, trash collection, etc.
          7. Prisoners have free access to the prison grounds at all times.
          8. Library and recreational facilities for prisoners are better than for the law-abiding soldiers and their families on the rest of the base.
          I could continue, but you get the idea. A stay at one of these “prisons” is like a stay at Club Med.

          • Daniel so true. The one that gets me is we are under sniper fire.that must have been some sorry ass snipers. They didnt connect. They need more range time

          • LOL Right Eddie any more “threats” you’d like to make? (Here’s an idea Eddie why not enlist and get a little of that “experience” stuff so you’ll have some idea of what you’re… oh wait… you’re a Liperal… never mind. If it isn’t theoretical trash you people NEVER understand it.)

          • you conspiracy idiots will believe anything you read on the internet. There are thousands of hour of erroneous articles and you conspiracy believe all of them . How sad. that people are so ignorant nutcases.

          • I don’t know what you are laughing at if I am spreading propaganda its the truth kind. I don’t take anything on the inter net at face value. there is so much false information on it one has to fact check everything. As high as 75 percent . The right wing has so many false publications it hard to put any faith in anything. There are 1000’s of misleading and out right lies listed. but it plays to the right wing conspiracy nutcases. They all pose as legitimate news media and could be farther from the truth………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

          • Listen GOOFY go look at MAIN STREAM media! MOST of them HATE to admit TOO the truth, but they CAN’T COMPLETELY hide it! Hells bells, a former Judge just got through telling that dough brain Geraldo Rivera that his political TRASH cuts NO ICE when it comes to the law and that as Swillary herself said, “NO ONE is too big to be sent to prison!” The FBI and TWO DEMOCRAT intel IG’s have made it MORE THAN CLEAR… SHE’S GUILTY! The only questions ARE: HOW MANY COUNTS OF WHAT?
            Like you, he THINKS that the fact that she’s running for President SHOULD make a difference! BUT, the LAW remains the same… FOR US ALL! The ONLY reason that the investigation ISN’T finished is? BECAUSE the STATE DEPT has drug it’s feet getting the FBI ALL of the emails the court order says they HAVE TO PRODUCE!

          • You have been watching to much FOX News, they haven’t told the truth the 25 years they have been on the air. They are a wing of the republican party plain and simple.The inquiry by the FBI is considered preliminary and appears to be focused on ensuring the proper handling of classified material. Officials have said that Clinton, the Democratic presidential front-runner, is not a target.
            The FBI’s efforts have included contacting the Denver-based technology firm that helped manage the Clintons’ unusual private ­e-mail system. [The Washington Post

          • and you have been posting shit over and over again. by the way,who is paying you for all this crap you post????? I think you are a Clinton relative,right??? If so,I feel sorry for you as I would not like one of my relatives to be a criminal and murderer.

          • Voting for killary clinton is the same as voting for the devil. She is a vicious and dangerous freak and belongs in an institution or a JAIL CELL immediately.And you Edwin can visit her every day since you admire this disgusting animal..

          • You believe all the right wing lies from the right wing and publications. listed are a few..50 right-wing news sources that are infecting the American mind
            Republicans often talk about the media’s “liberal bias” when many of their claims aren’t validated. Ever since Sarah Palin was thrust into the spotlight in 2008, cries of “lame stream media” have been heard echoing through the ear drums of registered voters. Whether it’s NBC, CBS, CNN, ABC or any other “main stream” news outlet, the right-wing are often quick to attack, claiming bias against conservatives and the Republican agenda.While one major news channel, MSNBC, promotes a more progressive message during their prime time line-up, they promote themselves as liberal, tagging themselves with the slogan “lean forward.” Other news channels, such as CNN, have actually taken steps to the right of the political spectrum in an attempt to capitalize on Fox News’ ratings success.
            Despite claims of media bias, the number one rated news channel is Fox News, the loudest voice for conservatism in the country. Even outside television, conservative media is often easily found. The overwhelming majority of talk radio is dominated by right-wing voices. Earlier this year, “Talkers” magazine released their annual “Heavy Hundred” list of the 100 most important radio show hosts in the country. Out of the top ten, only three would be described as “liberal” or “progressive,” with the remaining being far right conservatives or libertarian. The rest of the list is similar to the top 10 as conservative talk shows heavily outnumber their liberal counter parts.
            The internet is also a viable place to promote your political agenda. Conservative blogs and websites have popped up at a record number over the last few years and don’t look to be slowing down any time soon.
            While there are liberal talk shows and blogs, the conservative claim that the entire media has a bias favoring liberals is just false. The list below is simply a counter to that claim and, in no particular order, is a list of 50 of the worst places you could go to get your news and information.

            1. Fox News
            2. The Rush Limbaugh Show
            3. Glenn Beck
            4. Savage Nation w/ Michael Savage
            5. Alex Jones’ Info Wars
            6. The Heritage Foundation
            7. The Wall Street Journal Op-Ed
            8. The Neal Boortz Radio Show
            9. Sean Hannity
            10. Bill O’Reilly
            11. Rightwingnews.com
            12. National Review
            13. The Mark Levin Show
            14. The Weekly Standard
            15. Washington Times
            16. The American Conservative
            17. The Drudge Report
            18. The Cato Institute
            19. Media Research Center
            20. Townhall.com
            21. Red State
            22. Andew Breitbart’s Big Government
            23. The American Cause
            24. Christian Coalition
            25. The John Birch Society
            26. Citizens United
            27. Freedom Works
            28. Tea Party Express
            29. Tea Party Patriots
            30. The Herman Cain Show
            31. News Busters
            32. News Max
            33. The New York Post
            34. Conservative HQ
            35. Sirius radio “Patriot”
            36. Conservative American News
            37. Conservative Daily News
            38. Judicial Watch
            39. The Source Daily
            40. Republican National Committee
            41. American Spectator
            42. Reason Magazine
            43. Freedom Rings Radio hosted by Kenneth
            John
            44. Conservapedia
            45. The Right Side of the Web
            46. CNS News
            47. Michael Reagan
            48. Family Research Council
            49. Conservative Underground
            50. The Hugh Hewitt Show

          • Ok whatever, I am TIRED of attempting to educate someone who is DETERMINED not to listen to the facts. You go believe ANY idiotic fairy tale you want about how it’s all just some conspiracy. GEEEZ!!!

          • LOL Evidently you’re right about one part… I DO seem to be incapable of educating a jackass. The FACTS I have presented are what is KNOWN by means of info leaked by the investigators and as fanatical as he is in her defense even Geraldo Rivera doesn’t dispute them!

          • You might as well get over it . Hillary will be the next President of the US and HUD Sec. Jullian Castro will be Vice President.

          • (Shaking my head) IN the HIGHLY unlikely event that such a travesty should come about, it will mean that our nation has finally become more corrupt than any third world country in existence!

          • If the Republicans would put someone up that had half a brain, you wouldn’t have to worry about hat , would you. The right wing and the Tea Baggers have ruined the GOP/

          • Trump will make an excellent and no the Tea Party looks to be an agent for change in the GOP and that’s a good thing, IF their bosses don’t try to Shang Hai their convention. Your party? Well, Swillary PROBABLY won’t be running, unless this nation has finally become the MOST corrupt on the planet. And, sadly, while Bernie Panders would be an improvement over the divisive garbage in office, our economy can’t withstand much more… IF we can even make it TOO the election after Bush and Bosco!

          • Go listen to more of Hickraldo Eddie, or Sharpton or Swillary herself. Maybe it will help you with that allergy you have for truth to immerse yourself in more TOTAL BS!

          • I have been stating for several months that Establishment Republicans will change convention rules, if necessary, to make sure their candidate gets the nomination, and I was right. Establishment Republicans are already hard at work trying to get a brokered convention*.
            *A brokered convention means delegates to the convention will NOT be obligated to vote for the candidate they pledged to vote for in order to become a delegate.

          • Yep and McConnell and a few others have made that clear. Look for Trump TOO run third party when they stab him and their own rank and file in the back just like the DNC is doing to theirs for this worn out, incompetent, self serving old hag!

          • I do not believe Trump will run third party. I believe the GOP will run its own third party candidate if their candidate does not get the nomination at convention. I don’t even rule out Romney as their potential third party candidate.

          • The GOP ruined itself by embracing Liberalism. The TEA Party and other “right wing” organizations are trying to rescue the GOP; from itself.

          • well it can not get any clearer to me,the republican party as a whole are totally against this president,and anyone of color.Plus they seem to have a lot of stupid people who just keep running their mouth.I can remember my mother telling me “no one knows how dumb you are until you open your mouth”,and the republicans have been telling on themselves from the very beginning. If I were a republican I would find another party to join,because “if it looks like a duck,walks like a duck,is seen in the company of ducks,it is a duck.There is no fixing of stupid,

          • Republicans oppose anyone of color? Have you forgotten it was Democrats who opposed civil rights legislation? Legislation that was proposed by Republicans. Republicans do not oppose obama because of his color. They oppose him because obama is anti-American. The things that have made America a leader in the world are the things obama and other Liberals are trying to destroy.

          • My, you are so intelligent. I am highly impressed , Now. tale your medication and go to bed as you must be exhausted at your age to comment to people. I am curious to know how much the filthy evil bitch is paying you to post in her favor?? Or are you her attorney?????

          • Its obvious you don’t have anything itellgenbt to say. The 2016 presidential campaign on Monday moved to Illinois, however briefly, when the filing of petitions began at 8 a.m. for March 15 primary ballot spots for White House candidates and their all-important nominating delegate contenders.
            Among the first to file were backers of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Chicago native who grew up in Park Ridge, who is seeking the Democratic presidential nomination. Sorry to disappoint you.

          • “Its obvious you don’t have anything itellgenbt to say.”

            ROTFLMAO!

            Attacking Rose’s intelligence while misspelling the word itself. 😀

            The rest is stolen directly from the Chicago Tribune:

            http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/politics/ct-illinois-president-primary-march-15-filing-donald-trump-jeb-bush-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-20160103-story.html

            Don’t you realize the absolute DISSERVICE you are doing to the ‘Hillary for Prison – er, President 2016’ campaign, edwin?

          • what would you know about intelligence spelling or otherwise. What about the disservice you are doing to the human race. Hillary will be the next President , get over it.

          • “what would you know about intelligence spelling or otherwise.”

            Totally grammar-incorrect, edwin. 🙂

            Did you even graduate “grammar school,” edwin?

            “What about the disservice you are doing to the human race”

            1) I served as Security Police and CATM Instructor in my military career, and both an appointed and elected public safety official in my civilian career, edwin. “What did you do in the war?”

            2) Do try to learn to end a query with a question mark (?). 😉

            “Hillary will be the next President , get over it.”

            You seem to forget what happened to Nixon AFTER he was elected to his second term for things HE did wrong BEFORE he was re-elected, edwin.

            President Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton: indicted and convicted of felonies during her first – and last – term. 🙂

            Guess you didn’t realize that the penalty for her crimes include three years in the federal penitentiary, along with automatic removal from office and total ban on ever holding public office again! 🙂

            All because she was so self-centered that she believed that the laws didn’t apply to a Clinton!

            Better find the very best VPOTUS you can find, you LibSoc SJW DNC quisling/propagandist – as that is who would serve out the remainder of her term – IF she were to be elected. 😀

            Hark! Do I see a Biden silently waiting in the wings for his call to save the DNC from TOTAL embarasment? 😉

          • The Revolutionary War, You are all into grammar lessons, most are typos and I don’t always proof read. What do you know about the human race , I see no proof you are part of it, You are so fucki-g stupid I am done answering your stupid comments.

          • “You are all into grammar lessons, most are typos and I don’t always proof read.”

            This is just more proof that YOU are the one who’s “fucki-g stupid” here, edwin.

            “I am done answering your stupid comments.”

            Guess you’re tired of getting your LibSoc SJW Dimocrat ass kicked all over the Ether. 🙂

            Might as well run away, edwin; seeing as how you have done such a piss-poor job countering all those “stupid comments.”

            As we used to say: “Don’t go away mad; just go away!”

          • Sorry I do not have one but I am sue if you would get tested lby a psychiatrist, he would suggest some medication along with an insane asylum for treatment

          • Hey Edwin, I understand the FBI would like to speak with “Killery” they have “SEVERAL” things they would like to know!!! lol, hah get out of this one killery!!! lol

          • SHE HAS HAD TO PUT UP WITH THIS CRAP FOR 40 YEARS. IF YOU LOVE HILLARY CONSPIRACIES SO MUCH I WILL SEND YOU A WHOLE LIST YOU CAN DROUL OVER.
            You have no proof of any of the crap you put out. If you love conspiracies lies about Hillary so much, I will send you some more to enjoy. If that is what you get off on.
            Clinton Conspiracy Theory (So Far)
            From killing cats to faking concussions, all the dastardly deeds attributed to the former secretary of state and first lady.
            Long before she let Benghazi happen, Hillary Clinton was the center of a swirl of inventive rumors about sex, drugs, and murder. For entertainment purposes only, we’ve rounded up some of the greatest (i.e., most scurrilous). We’ll add more as they inevitably bubble up in the run-up to the 2016 race.
            Benghazi on the brain
            Concussiongate
            Rumor: Then-Secretary of State Clinton faked the flu and a concussion in December 2012 to avoid testifying to Congress about Benghazi.
            Rumormongers: 2016 presidential dark horse John Bolton and Fox News contributor Monica Crowley
            #TCLOT
            Rumor: As if a phony head injury wasn’t bad enough—Hillary faked a blood clot, an even more serious medical condition, to further delay her Benghazi testimony.
            Rumormonger: Glenn Beck, who added that “if she really had some weird thing in the hospital, then it should prohibit her from ever becoming president.”
            Brained by Bush’s brain
            Rumor: The clot was real, and Hillary suffered lingering brain damage that could render her unfit for office.
            Rumormonger: Fox News analyst Karl Rove, who backtracked the next day.
            The CLINTON Body Count
            Fostering doubts
            Rumor: Various theories hold that former Clinton White House chief of staff Vince Foster didn’t commit suicide in Virginia’s Fort Marcy Park. One posits that he was killed because he was having an affair with Hillary Clinton.
            Rumormongers: Former Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.) once shot a watermelon (or a pumpkin—it’s unclear) to prove that Foster was shot by someone else. Accuracy in Media founder Reed Irvine took out an ad in the New York Times to note that the FBI had failed to investigate “semen in Foster’s shorts, blond hair on his T-shirt and trousers and multicolored carpet fibers on all his clothing.” (Bonus: Anne Coulter once joked, “If you attack the Clintons publicly, make sure all your friends know that you are not planning suicide.”)
            Ron Brown’s body
            Rumor: Commerce Secretary Ron Brown and 34 others were killed in a plane crash orchestrated by the Clintons to prevent him from spilling the beans to special investigators about selling seats on trade missions.
            Rumormonger: The Clinton Body Count, a website linking the first family to more than 90 deaths.
            Whitewater whitewash
            Rumor: After agreeing to cooperate with special investigator Ken Starr, Whitewater partner James McDougal died in prison—allegedly at the hands of Clinton henchmen. “Chalk up another body to Clinton,” as one Rush Limbaugh caller put it. An alternative theory: McDougal faked his death to avoid ratting out his benefactors.
            Rumormonger: The Clinton Body Count
            Kittycide
            Rumor: Former Clinton aide Kathleen Willey alleged that after her cat went missing, a suspicious-looking jogger told her to watch what she said. Then her new cat turned up dead.
            Rumormonger: Willey, in the the 2007 pseudo-documentary Hillary: The Movie (which triggered the Citizens United Supreme Court decision).
            The Sex stuff
            Gay until inauguration
            Rumor: After majoring in lesbianism at Wellesley, Hillary entered into a sham marriage with Bill Clinton to cover up the truth. At one point, a former classmate moved to Little Rock to continue an affair with Hillary.
            Rumormonger: Edward Klein, author of The Truth About Hillary: What She Knew, When She Knew It, and How Far She’ll Go to Become President
            Bisexual after inauguration
            Rumor: Bill confided that his wife was a bisexual who, as she put it, “had eaten more pussy than he had.”
            Rumormonger: Former Clinton mistress Gennifer Flowers, in a 2013 interview with the Daily Mail
            Webb of lies
            Rumor: Associate attorney general Webb Hubbell was really Chelsea’s father. (And Vince Foster was possibly killed because he knew.)
            Rumormonger: This guy on the Internet who keeps emailing me and every other DC journalist.
            Bermuda shorts
            Rumor: Forget Webb Hubbell. Chelsea was conceived when Bill forced himself on Hillary during a vacation in Bermuda.
            Rumormonger: Klein, keeping it classy.
            Troopergate
            Rumor: Hillary looked the other way when then-Gov. Bill Clinton used Arkansas state troopers to set up sexual liaisons with dozens—maybe hundreds—of women.
            Rumormonger: Former right-wing operative-turned-Media Matters honcho David Brock, who later wrote in his book, Blinded by the Right, that “none of the trooper allegations that could be independently checked turned out to be true.”
            Bill’s black love child
            Rumor: Bill fathered a son after after luring a prostitute into a cocaine-fueled orgy. Hillary dutifully covered it up.
            Rumormongers: Little Rock businessman Robert McIntosh circulated a flier noting the resemblance between 13-year-old Danny Williams and a young William Jefferson Blythe during the 1992 campaign. A 1999 Drudge Report exclusive featured Williams’ mother’s on-tape confession. “What becomes immediately obvious to the viewer watching the videotaped confession is that this is clearly not gossip, rumor, or anonymous charges being maliciously directed at a politician,” wrote Drudge, before learning three days later that the child was not Clinton’s.
            Come all ye faithful
            Rumor: As first lady, Hillary decorated the White House Christmas tree with condoms, cock rings, and lords-a-leapin’ with erect penises.
            Rumormongers: Disgruntled former FBI agent Gary Aldrich, in his 1996 tell-all, Unlimited Access; and Texas activist “Doc Marquis,” who seized on Aldrich’s claims as “proof positive that Hillary Clinton is a power, practicing witch.”
            Sexual pagan
            Rumor: No, it’s not the name of my new metal band—it’s Hillary Clinton’s orientation.
            Rumormonger: Southern Evangelical Seminary president Richard Land, who leveled the charge in response to the secretary of state’s advocacy for gay rights in Africa.
            The Drug stuff
            Powder hungry
            Rumor: When Bill was governor, the Clintons covered up a multimillion-dollar cocaine smuggling ring based in Mena, Arkansas.
            Rumormonger: The Clinton Chronicles (below), a 1994 pseudo-documentary distributed by the Reverend Jerry Falwell
            Boys on the tracks
            Rumor: Seventeen-year-olds Kevin Ives and Don Henry weren’t hit by a train after passing out on an Arkansas railroad track; they were brutally murdered after witnessing a Clinton-assisted drug drop.
            Rumormongers: Former Rep. William Dannemeyer (R-Calif.) and The Clinton Chronicles
            Assorted Power madness
            Four martini punch
            Rumor: Reporter LJ Davis didn’t, as he claimed, pass out on his floor after drinking one too many martinis—he was assaulted in his Arkansas hotel room in 1994 by Clinton goons and robbed of four “significant” pages from his notebook. His crime: Asking too many questions about Clinton’s work at a Little Rock law firm.
            Rumormongers: The Wall Street Journal editorial page, which cited the incident as evidence that Arkansas is a “congenitally violent place,” and Rush Limbaugh, who told his listeners, “journalists and others working on or involved in Whitewatergate have been mysteriously beaten and harassed in Little Rock; some have died.”
            PC police
            Rumor: As first lady, Clinton formed her own clandestine police force. Agents embedded in the FBI, the CIA, and the IRS harassed and eliminated critics.
            Rumormongers: Richard Poe, author of Hillary’s Secret War, and American Evita author Christopher Andersen
            Con air
            Rumor: Hillary purged the White House Travel Office in order to set up a system of kickbacks for an Arkansas airline helmed by a childhood friend of Bill’s.
            Rumormongers: Brock and current Virginia congressional candidate Barbara Comstock
            Red, not blue
            Rumor: A “meticulously documented” report exposed the Clintons’ links to a Marxist terrorist plot to take over the country, inspired by the Italian communist and grad-student favorite Antonio Gramsci. Exhibit A: Hillary’s failed health care reform plan.
            Rumormonger: WorldNetDaily columnist Samuel Blumenfeld
            Filegate
            Rumor: Classified FBI files were requested and misused by first lady Hillary Clinton to target enemies of the administration. White House Office of Personnel Security Craig Livingstone took the fall when Republican investigators caught wind.
            Rumormonger: Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), who demanded FBI files be swiped for the first lady’s fingerprints.
            Brazilian whacks
            Rumor: The Clintons forced former Hillary donor Peter Paul to spend two years in a Brazilian prison—including two months in a cellblock known as the “Corridor of Death”—after he filed a lawsuit against the couple claiming they knew about his illegal campaign finance dealings.
            Rumormonger: Paul, in the 2007 pseudo-documentary Hillary Uncensored
            Black helcopters
            Rumor: Team Hillary used helicopters to surveil the Southampton home of 2006 Republican Senate challenger—and current Fox News contributor—K.T. McFarland.
            Rumormonger: McFarland, at a campaign event on Long Island
            Rush to judgment
            Rumor: Rush Limbaugh’s 2006 drug bust for painkillers possession was a set-up by the Clinton machine.
            Rumormonger: Poe again
            The Muslim stuff
            Muslim Sisterhood
            Rumor: Clinton and top aide/alleged lover Huma Abedin (wife of ex-Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.)) are in cahoots with the ladies’ auxiliary of the Muslim Brotherhood. Which explains why Clinton has been secretly pushing us to spread Sharia law in America.
            Rumormongers: “Huma’s mom is best friends with the new so-called first lady of Egypt, who is also a member of the Sisterhood,” explained Rush Limbaugh. “Folks, it’s Peyton place—it’s too much to keep up with.” Rep. Michele Bachmann’s allegations of collaboration between Clinton and the Brotherhood was cited by protesters in the streets of Cairo.
            Mullah moolah
            Rumor: Clinton’s Islamofascist sympathies were secured with a bribe from Iran.
            Rumormonger: Judicial Watch founder Larry Klayman, who conscientiously adds, “I cannot prove it at this time.”
            Ban on churches
            Rumor: Clinton was working with Islamists to shut down Christian houses of worship in the United States before she left office in 2013.
            Rumormonger: Conservative speaker and self-described “former terrorist” Kamal Saleem
            Hillary Clinton with fellow Muslim sympathizer Barack Obama in Cairo, 2009.
            Just Plain Bizarre
            Cold-blooded
            Rumor: Like most of the Washington elite, Hillary is in fact a blood-drinking extraterrestrial lizard in disguise.
            Rumormonger: “Reptoid hypothesis” creator David Icke
            Everything is Illuminati’ed
            Rumor: Wake up, sheeple. The Clintons belong to an 18th-century secret society that controls global governance and finance.
            Rumormongers: Lots of crazy people on YouTube
            Contra dancing
            Rumor: In the 1970s, Hillary worked at a Little Rock law firm that helped funnel weapons to the Contras.
            Rumormonger: The late Nation columnist Alexander Cockburn
            Blood money
            Rumor: The Clintons consented to the harvesting and selling of HIV- and hepatitis C-positive blood from prison inmates to China in the 1980s.
            Rumormongers: Klein and WorldNetDaily conspiracy guru Joseph Farah
            Starr crossed
            Rumor: Why did the Clintons enjoy impunity for their myriad crimes? Easy: Ken Starr, the man tasked with investigating them, was a secret Clinton crony.
            Rumormonger: Poe again
            Get behind me, thetan
            Rumor: Why did the did the movie version of Primary Colors, in which John Travolta plays a thinly-veiled Bill Clinton, go so easy on the first couple? Maybe because President Clinton pressured the German government to extend religious protections to the Church of Scientology.
            Rumormonger: The New York Post reported that Sen. Lauch Faircloth (R-N.C.) demanded an investigation into the matter; Faircloth denied this.
            It’s a tax!
            Rumor: As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton was pushing a secret United Nations takeover of the Internet, to be paid for by a secret tax on American billionaires.
            Rumormonger: Former Clinton aide Dick Morris
            Goo goo for Gaga: Clinton’s State Department betrayed its true function as an “agent for Lady Gaga” when it helped the “Bad Romance” singer secure a gig at a gay pride event in Italy.
            Rumormonger: Mission: America founder Linda Harvey
            Here We Go Again…
            Face the nation
            Rumor: Clinton got a face-lift after leaving the State Department to “glam up” for 2016.
            Rumormonger: Fox and Friends’ Steve Doocy, who tweeted afterwards that he was referring only to Clinton’s website.
            Hey sole sister
            Rumor: Clinton hired a mentally ill woman to throw a sneaker at her while giving a speech to the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries in Las Vegas in April.
            Rumormongers: Limbaugh and former Republican presidential front runner Herman Cain
            Hill’s angels
            Rumor: Hillary is a tool of the Dark Lord Lucifer sent to oppose Jesus Christ in the Last Days.
            Rumormonger: Montana Republican congressional candidate Ryan Zinke, who called Clinton the “anti-Christ” at a January campaign event.
            It takes a child
            Rumor: Chelsea Clinton became pregnant at the behest of her parents, who believe that the former secretary of state will be viewed more favorably if she has grandkids.
            Rumormongers: Fox News host Howie Kurtz, the Washington Free Beacon’s Michael Goldfarb, and the New York Times’ Andrew Ross Sorkin.
            Vanity press
            Rumor: The Clintons arranged for Vanity Fair to publish Monica Lewinsky’s recent essay two-and-a-half years before the next presidential election, so it would be forgotten by 2016.
            Rumormonger: Prolific children’s author Lynne Cheney, who asked Bill O’Reilly, “Would Vanity Fair publish anything about Monica Lewinsky that Hillary Clinton wouldn’t want in Vanity Fair?” (Yes.)
            To be continued…

          • LOL Yeah just like that poor Capone guy, one accusation after another but they never could prove anything but tax evasion… he was just an innocent victim of conspiracy’s too right Eddie?

          • She been an op[en book for 40 years. its people like you who has stirred up sh_t when there wasn’t any. How would you like someone to treat you that way. Conspiracy after conspiracy. The reason she hasn’t got into trouble is there was nothing there and there never has been. Its all in your right wing nut cases mind and what you read in the dozen of right wing rag publications talk radio and right wing TV..(FOX etc.)

          • Any law enforcement officer will tell you there is a difference between what you know and what you can prove. Hillary may have been able to avoid prosecution because there she hasn’t done anything wrong: I’ll grant you that possibility. BUT, another possibility is that she is extremely able to hide or cover up her illegal activities.
            Personal Note. I believe Hillary is a sociopath. Sociopaths believe the law applies to others, but not to them: They live according to their own law, not society’s law.

          • 😉 Poor Eddie, such a gullible dolt, he doesn’t comprehend SO many things and knows so very little about the military and guns that everything he THINKS he “knows” is nothing more than the pure BS he’s been fed by Liperal liars with an agenda. And so, the poor little thing jumps to conclusions and makes all manner of ASSumptions based upon the combination of his own ignorance and the propaganda he’s been spoon fed.

          • Howleyesque so true how ignorant liberal lunatic fools like eddie. Have to be lead by the hand everywhere they go. Pathetic isnt it

          • The saddest part is just what Goebbels said, the fools LONG for their chains and are so blinded by the propaganda that they BELIEVE they’re acting of their own free will, to such an extent that they REFUSE to see truth that conflicts WITH the propaganda! And have the RIGHT to take us all down with them… with their votes. Two legged versions of Pavlov’s dogs!

          • “Propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated are confident they are acting on their own free will.”
            – Joseph Goebbels, Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda (Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda) forthe Nazi Party (1933-1945)

          • I’m beginning to believe edwin here is a paid Usenet/Internet/Blog quisling propagandist for the Hillary For Prison; er, President 2016 Campaign.

            Did you see his latest verbose bit of “Hillary Did No Wrong” propaganda?

          • As patently BS as his “arguments” have become, I’ve STOPPED bothering to READ THEM! There is NO POINT! When someone simply REFUSES to see the truth, attempts too communicate become pointless. So I think you could well be right as I find it difficult to believe that ANYONE COULD BE that obtuse and be able to use the computer as he does.

          • No, THAT would be that bible thumpin’ head case ADRoberts, who’s convinced that God left HIM in charge! LOL Poor ole Eddie is just a Liperal who REFUSES to see or admit too the truth.

          • Go screw yourself, CREEP. Everyone is laughing at our utterly ridiculous posts so we are all having a great time.

          • He’s also a serial plagiarist, Rose.

            Not a single original “itellgenbt” thought comes out of that LibSoc SJW “talking head.”

          • Lower calling rates will allow the 2.7 million children of inmates to stay in touch with a parent in prison. Previously all phone calls were paid by the families at a high rate from collect calls. There is a program for 29 dollars a month for unlimited phone calls available. I could find no cases were the government offered free phone calls and no where a family can live with the inmate. babies born in prison can live with the mother in most states up to one years and some have congenial visits.

          • LOL Because after all the government ADVERTISES it’s inequality. Get real Eddie! The really funny part being that you… a Liperal, are now claiming that there IS NO socio-economic disparity!

          • a lot of the fault, actually, belongs to the conservative intellectual leadership of America.” The conservative cause that animates the Republican Party, we don’t appeal to young people, we don’t appeal to millennials, we don’t appeal to young women, we don’t appeal to minorities. We appeal to only cranky old white guys
            The dam has broken and the Conservative pundits are drowning in the mess they’ve made of the GOP. The top two candidates that are leading the polls are Donald Trump and Ted Cruz and both are hated by the Conservative illuminati and Republican politicians equally.

          • And to think, edwin here is the “best” the LibSoc SJW Democrat Party has to offer. 🙂

            One must wonder just how old edwin really is…..

          • He wonders because your posts sound more like 12 going on 13! Few adults are so utterly, intentionally blind to any and all truth.

          • I have not seen anything coming out of your post that was even at that level. This whole blog has some of the most stupid and disgusting comment I haver ran acrtoss and after blogging for over 3 years I have seen ther worst.

          • I have come to the conclusion that ‘edwin’ here is a DNC quisling plant – here specifically to put forth preprepared pro-Hillary, pro-Barack, anti-Republican and anti-TEA Party DNC propaganda.

            This is evidenced by the fact that when he posts his own “thoughts” they are filled with typos and other evidence of lower-than-usual acumen.

            Witness his response to your above-posted message:

            “This whole blog has some of the most stupid and disgusting comment I haver (SIC) ran acrtoss {SIC) and after blogging for over 3 years I have seen ther {SIC} worst.”

            Guess he never learned proofreading. 🙂

            Since he claims to being “78,” that would have put him in grade school starting in 1943 and taken him to at least 1955 in public schools.

            The English language was taught in its purest form back then.

            Moreover, when requested to verify his postings, he quite often – instead of answering with facts – goes into “attack mode.”

            One such example:

            In response to my posting a CBS News/Associated Press article by Brad Klapper (@bklapperAP) titled “State Department routinely sent secrets over email,” which contained “The transmission of now-classified information across Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private email is consistent with a State Department culture in which diplomats routinely sent secret material on unsecured email during the past two administrations, according to documents reviewed by The Associated Press,” ‘edwin’ posted:

            “The CBS article you refer to the reporter [Brad Klapper] was only a contributor to the article”

            I challenged him with:

            “Prove it, edwin: no one here takes anything you write at face value – which is ZERO.”

            His response?

            “If anybody is a Nazi propagandist it you and the right wing crap you put out. Nazis were right wing nut cases just like your right wing friends.”

            I am through with ‘edwin’ here. He cannot be dealt with logically and honestly, as he has fully demonstrated himself to be a “Yellow Dog Democrat” incapable of accepting that Hillary, Barack and the Democrat Party as a whole are dead set to “fundamentally change” the United States of America into the “United Socialist States of America.”

            One must wonder just what ‘edwin’ expects to gain personally out of a Hillary presidency???

            One thing I take from his postings to this Conservative blog is that, despite all his and the DNC’s efforts, his “impact” has been exactly OPPOSITE from their goals – he has not “won friends and (positively) influenced people” here. 🙂

          • LOL Yep it’s tough to win when you’re only ammunition is comprised of duds! I don’t have a clue who or what he is other than utterly unwilling to face reality and the obvious facts that are pretty much known to all by now… EXCEPT the willfully blind.
            My only guess would be that he fears losing whatever he’s getting from the government now.
            The only ones I’ve found that are worse (aside from the BLM bigots) would be Redman, Ron Stuckwey and ADRoberts (the last one is some crazy bible thumper who thinks God left him in charge! LOL Classic Messiah complex!

          • There are a few typos. so what. Why do I support Hillary, I ask what has the Republican party done for the working and middle class in the past 40 years. Just say no and investigate are not policies. There is a difference between Liberal and Conservative.
            it is a battle between old school and new school. The old school scholars say judges should interpret the Constitution as our founding fathers intended. The new school says that the Constitution changes and evolves.
            Those new schoolers believe in what some call a “living constitution.” In other words, the past is the past and today’s world is much different than 200 years ago, so the Constitution needs to be interpreted in that light.
            Elliot Minsberg is vice president of the liberal activist group People for the American Way. “It was the framers that intended that the Constitution would adapt to changing circumstances,” he asserted.
            That is not how the old schoolers look at it. Todd Gaziano is with the conservative think tank, The Heritage Foundation.
            “There is one philosophy, original intent” Gaziano said. “That is the only legitimate means of interpretation under our written Constitution and all other philosophies which are illegitimate.”
            On the Supreme Court, Justice Ruth Bade Ginsberg, a liberal, is a believer in the living Constitution.
            Justice Antonin Scalia believes in following the original intent of the founding fathers. He has warned that if judges start to redefine the constitutional text according to their own views, then they have rendered the Constitution useless.
            Gaziano stated, “Only the judges that are faithful to the text in the original understanding of the text are following the rule of law.”
            Old schoolers say that looking at the Constitution as a living, breathing document is dangerous. They point to a long list of Supreme Court decisions that basically created new rights.
            For example, abortion. The Roe v. Wade decision legalized abortion. Originalists say this is a new right that has been made up.
            Same thing with gay rights in Lawrence v. Texas; the high court basically established a constitutional right to sodomy. And then there is the juvenile death penalty, where the high court, in Roper v. Simmons ruled that children under 18 should not be subject to the death penalty.
            Ginsberg defends this approach saying the Constitution must allow for broad interpretation.

          • “Why do I support Hillary, I ask what has the Republican party done for the working and middle class in the past 40 years.”

            From that Left-wing source MotherJones comes:

            Democrats Have Done Virtually Nothing for the Middle Class in 30 Years
            —By Kevin Drum | Mon Mar. 10, 2014 11:30 AM EDT

            Sean McElwee urges Democrats to find a new way to appeal to the working class:

            For decades, thinkers on the left have wondered why the working class regularly votes against its own interests….Thomas Frank argued that social issues obscure economic motives, and indeed the most salient non-economic one has always been race, at least in this country….Nixon’s “law and order campaign” played on racial fears, as did Reagan’s denunciation of “welfare queens.” Republicans played at race to win solid majorities for decades while actively working against the interests of the majority of Americans. The left has much to learn about this strategy. It needs to fundamentally re-align Americans around an issue with a deep and latent importance: the environment.

            I don’t really want to pick on McElwee here, but I guess I’m feeling a little peevish this morning. Why is it that the working class often votes against its own economic interests? Well, let’s compare the sales pitches of the Republican and Democratic parties when it comes to pocketbook issues:

            Republicans: We will lower your taxes.

            Democrats: We, um, support policies that encourage a fairer distribution of growth and….and….working man….party of FDR….um….

            There are two problems with the Democratic approach. First, it’s too abstract to appeal to anyone. Second, it’s not true anyway. Democrats simply don’t consistently support concrete policies that help the broad working and middle classes. Half of them voted for the bankruptcy bill of 2005. They’ve done virtually nothing to stem the growth of monopolies and next to nothing to improve consumer protection in visible ways. They don’t do anything for labor. They’re soft on protecting Social Security. They bailed out the banks but refused to bail out underwater homeowners. Hell, they can’t even agree to kill the carried interest loophole, a populist favorite if ever there was one.

            Sure, Democrats do plenty for the poor. They support increases in the EITC and the minimum wage. They support Medicaid expansion. They passed Obamacare. They support pre-K for vulnerable populations. They expanded CHIP. But virtually none of this really benefits the working or middle classes except at the margins.

            Now McElwee wants to use environmentalism to appeal to the working class. I’m all for that. But you don’t have to play 11-dimensional chess to figure out how Republicans will respond. They’ll say that Democrats want to raise your taxes. They’ll say Democrats want to take away your plastic bags. They’ll say Democrats want to make us all drive tiny cars or take the train everywhere. In coal country they’ll say Democrats want to take away your jobs.

            And then Democrats will wonder yet again why a big chunk of the working class votes for Republicans. It’s a stumper all right.

            Apologies for being peevish. But honestly, Democrats have done virtually nothing for the middle class for three decades now. They’re nearly as reliant on the business community for campaign funding as Republicans. Can we all stop pretending that there’s some deep mystery about why lots of working and middle class voters figure there are no real economic differences between the parties, so they might as well vote on social issues instead?

            -30-

            Kevin Drum is a political blogger for Mother Jones.

            http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2014/03/if-democrats-want-appeal-working-class-they-really-need-some-policies-benefit-wor

            Oh, BTW; WRT the Hillary email scandal:

            “Once again it’s clear Hillary Clinton prioritizes her personal convenience over national security. It’s as if she thinks the rules just don’t apply to her and it is hypocrisy of the highest order. Any other federal employee found acting in such a manner would likely have their clearance revoked, employment terminated, and could face prosecution. Instead, Hillary Clinton is in the running for a major promotion.”
            –Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR)

            Unlike Chicago-native and former “1st Lady of Arkansas,” Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton, Tom Cotton is a native-born Arkansan.

          • You don’t listen to facts regardless where they come from. You mentioned Tom Cotton, although he is a veteran, he is a joke.
            you say the Democrats haven’t done anything in the past 30 years goes to shoe you don’t research anything, just run your mouth.
            35 Reasons To Appreciate The Democratic Party – With All Their Faults 1) Democrats Fought for Social Security (F.D.R.)
            2) Democrats Fought for Medicare (L.B.J.)
            3) Democrats Fought for Medicaid (L.B.J.)
            4) Democrats Fought for Welfare Benefits (F.D.R.)
            5) Democrats Fought for Civil Rights (L.B.J.)
            6) Democrats Fought for Unemployment Insurance (F.D.R.)
            7) Democrats Fought for National Labor Relations Board (F.D.R.)
            8) Democrats Fought for 8 Hour Work Day-5 Day Work Week- Work Place Breaks & Overtime Pay (F.D.R.)
            9) Democrats Fought for Workers Compensation (Woodrow Wilson)
            10) Democrats Fought for Americans with Disability Act (101st Democratic Congress – over G.H.W. Bush veto)
            11) Democrats Fought for Holiday Pay(F.D.R.)
            12) Democrats Fought for Medical Leave Act (Bill Clinton)
            13) Democrats Fought for Prevention of Child Labor (F.D.R.)
            14) Democrats Fought for Minimum Wage Act (F.D.R.)
            15) Democrats Fought for Work Place Safety (OSHA) *** (Nixon)
            16) Democrats Fought for Affirmative Action as it relates to Racial Discrimination (J.F.K)
            17) Democrats Fought for Women’s Rights (L.B.J)
            18) Democrats Fought for Tax Fairness (Platform Issue)
            19) Democrats Fought for Veterans Pay & Benefits (F.D.R.)
            20) Democrats Fought for Consumer Protection / Consumer Bill of Rights (J.F.K.)
            21) Democrats Fought for Gun Law’s / Background Checks to prevent felons from getting Weapons (L.B.J) (B.Clinton)
            22) Democrats Fought for Credit Card Holders Bill of Rights (Barack Obama)
            23) Democrats Fought for Funding Our Schools (L.B.J.)
            24) Democrats Fought for Grants for low income people to attend college (L.B.J.)
            25) Democrats Fought for Environmental Regulations – Clean Water Act / Clean Air Act (Dems Override Nixon Veto)
            26) Democrats Fought for Financial Regulations keeping Wall Street Wizards Accountable (Dodd/Frank – Obama)
            27) Democrats Fought for Affordable Health Care for Everyone (Obama Care)
            28) Democrats Fought for Hate Crime Legislation (Matthew Shepard) (Barack Obama)
            29) Democrats Fought for Children’s Health Legislation for 11 Million Children without Health Care (Barack Obama)
            30) Democrats Fought for Voting Rights Act (L.B.J)
            31) Democrats Fought for National Voter Registration (Bill Clinton)
            32) Democrats Fought for Largest Deficit Cutting Plan in History (Bill Clinton)
            33) Democrats Fought for Clayton Anti-Trust Act (Woodrow Wilson)
            34) Democrats Fought for Securities & Exchange Act (Franklin D. Roosevelt)
            35) Democrats Fought for National School Lunch Program (Harry Truman) – See more at: What have Republicons ever done for America’s middle class?
            Proverbs 14:15 (Amplified Bible) “The naive or inexperienced person [is easily misled and] believes every word he hears, But the prudent man [is discreet and astute and] considers well where he is going.” What would you call people that believe that fully automatic weapons and cop-killer bullets should be freely available; who bomb abortion=
            clinics and advocate the murder of doctors who perform abortions; who believe that anyone who is not a Christian is doomed to Hell, and people who would elevate Creationism to the status of science? Give me a polite name and I’ll use it. Top 10 reasons to vote Republican

            1. You are a bigot

            2. You like eating, drinking and breathing poison. 3. You think the rich don’t have enough money

            4. You don’t support our veterans

            5. You like big deficits

            6. You don’t believe in free speech.

            7. You like big government

            8. You want government to hurt people, but not help them

            9. You are greedy, short sighted and rich

            10. You like torture

          • Just more plagiarism, edwin – stolen directly from the Democratic Underground:

            http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002432563

            Add to that just more ad hominem attack tactics.

            Face it, edwin: you have lost the battle here; so give it up – no one is buying into your LibSoc SJW DNC propaganda– no matter whose source you plagiarize!

          • I believe there is another Country Club cear Catalina Island. Omitted from the list was free medical care. The one I am thinking about has a condo tower rather than cottages. It even has a golf course . There living quarters are one bedroom condos. I read about this one yeers ago. the residents as they are called were even allowed to have pets who care and feed are paid for by the taxpayers. She should be incarcerated in the Federal Prison either north of Phoenix, AZ or just southeast of Tuscon. These are cell living quarters and cafeteria food. She may drop dead before the 2016 general election.

            She may not live long enough or be physially able to be incarcerated. Her coughing is getting worse. Not one doctor mentioning her other medical problems has explained this, that I can find. Maybe she is being treated for an STD infection in her throat and the doctors have been instructed to keep quiet about it. Her brain injury should automatically disqualify as she will not be able to perform the duties of the oval office properly being she gts confused easily and has a memory problem. Her speeches will not be long with her bladder problem. Her head injury causes her to be forgetful, confused and dizzy. I am not concerned about Hillary, but I am concerned who has been picked for a VP knowing Hillary won’t be able to do the job, this person would become president. and be behind the scenes president with Hillary the mouth piece.

          • The above claims are all false. While many people believe convicted white collar criminals are condemned to nothing worse than being locked up in a “country club,” the fact is that there really is no such thing. On a good day, an inmate’s day is pure drudgery. The morning routine described above is just the start. As one white collar federal inmate described it to me once, nothing about your life is your own anymore. Perhaps that is a small price to pay society for the damage financial fraud can cause. Cry me a river, you are probably saying, and you are right.
            But for these individuals, who once dwelled in the highest of high society, stood on the top rung of the corporate ladder and enjoyed the adulation of everyone around them, prison is a formidable punishment indeed.

          • Edwin you poor pathetic blind soul. Do you have Hitlaryitus and just damage to your little brain from too much liberalism and MSNBC CNN news. Yep sounds like it or you just support a known crooked corrupt conniving lying murderpus pig like Hitlary.

          • He probably is a relative of the clintons or he would not be posting tons of shit like he has for the past few weeks. Or better yet, he is getting paid to write this garbage.

          • Better to be a relative of the Clintons than a relative of the filthy mouthed right wing tea baggers on this blog. I have not heard so much filth both men and women. Can’t win at the ballot box so degare your opponets with filth and lies. A sorry bunch.

          • I’ve only presented the truth and if you and your idiots friends want to keep spreading your lies and hate messages, knock your selves out. As for as you and your ignorance, fu-k off. I have wasted way to much time on your mis-informed and stupid remarks. you need to get a life as well as the rest of your bigoted buddies..

          • Ahd you are a freak as anyone supporting a criminal must have an undeveloped brain or perhaps be brain dead. Read The Clinton Chronicles and the Clinton Body Count and perhaps by some magic, you will be informed fully out thee monsters.

        • The mind of the wise man leans to the right – while the mind of the fool leans to the left ! You are proof that statement is true !

      • FOR the charges that BARRING TOTAL corruption at the highest level of our government should be forth coming as soon as the State Dept STOPS dragging it’s feet and hands over the court ordered emails so that the FBI can CONCLUDE it’s investigation and the charges emanating FROM them can be filed.(try keeping up with the news Eddie)

        • … FACT: Clinton Did Not Receive Any Emails Labeled As “Classified” Or … At this point, Issa has no basis or evidence to show that Clinton had ….. MYTH: Clinton Never Took “Any Kind Of Responsibility” For Attacks …. FACT: IG Referral To Justice Department Was Not Criminal, And FBI Isn’t Targeting Clinton.

          • ROFLMAO!! OK… Eddie I’m just going to explain this simply and easily and then I’m through.
            FACT: The FBI DOES NOT spend enormous amounts of taxpayer money investigating unless they suspect that criminal activity of some kind HAS occurred.
            FACT: At NO TIME during her 4 years did Clinton EVER have a government email account… only her own.
            THEREFOR, as her server was NOT deemed to be PROPERLY SECURE, BY TWO DEMOCRAT IG’s there ARE TWO and ONLY TWO possibilities. EITHER she’s guilty OR
            AT NO TIME during 4 years as SOS did ANYONE, NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON IN OUR GOVERNMENT trust the SOS enough TOO send her classified info. Now IF that fairy tale sounds reasonable too you… you’re beyond hopeless.

          • Hey dumba$$ – Some of those e-mails are so secret the congressmen investigating her can’t even read them ! Duh !

          • That is because the dumb ass do nothing Republican congress can’t read evidently. … FACT: Clinton Did Not Receive Any Emails Labeled As “Classified” Or … At this point, Issa has no basis or evidence to show that Clinton had ….. … FACT: IG Referral To Justice Department Was Not Criminal, And FBI Isn’t Targeting Clinton.

          • edwin; you wrote:

            “FACT: Clinton Did Not Receive Any Emails Labeled As ‘Classified’.”

            edwin: I’ve already kicked your ass over this obfuscating prevarication, so put it away: re-posting it time and Time and TIME AGAIN only makes you look stupid (more stupid?).

          • Yu right wingers only want insult and slur people, You read material or listen to people with one objective to destroy Clinton or Obama and any one who disagrees with you. You quote people from Fox News or Judicial Watch and such who’s only objective is to do just that. I will repeat it again which is a waste of time with you people,
            Clinton only used her account for unclassified email. No information in Clinton’s emails was marked classified at the time she sent or received them.
            When information is reviewed for public release, it is common for information previously unclassified to be upgraded to classified if the State Department or another agency believes its public release could cause potential harm to national security, law enforcement or diplomatic relations.
            After reviewing a sampling of the 55,000 pages of emails, the Inspectors General have proffered that a small number of emails, which did not contain any classified markings and/or dissemination controls, should have been classified at the time they were sent. The State Department has said it disagrees with this assessment.

          • “Clinton only used her account for unclassified email.”

            Hillary Clinton used no other email than her own private server.

            At no time during her tenure as Secretary of State did she have or use an ‘@state.gov’ email address.

            “No information in Clinton’s emails was marked classified at the time she sent or received them.”

            Uh, edwin; guess you missed this from the ‘other side of the pond’:

            Game, set, match on ‘classified’ emails? Bombshell email shows Hillary Clinton telling aide to take ‘secure’ information and ‘send nonsecure’
            By J. Taylor Rushing, U.S. Political Reporter, For Dailymail.com
            Published: 17:04 EST, 8 January 2016 | Updated: 07:09 EST, 9 January 2016

            Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton has some `splaining to do, after a damaging email surfaced early Friday that appeared to show her instructing an aide to send classified information through ‘nonsecure’ email – after removing classified headings from the document.

            The 2011 email was included in more than 3,000 pages of emails released by the State Department at 1 a.m. Friday, as part of an effort to make up for a late December release that was smaller than expected.

            The emails – which have been ordered by a federal judge – have dogged Clinton’s front-running presidential campaign for almost the past year.

            Republicans hammered Clinton over both the timing and the content of Friday’s release.

            http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/01/08/21/2FED92FE00000578-3391031-image-a-63_1452287824741.jpg

            […]

            http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3391031/Game-set-match-classified-emails-Bombshell-email-shows-Hillary-Clinton-telling-aide-secure-information-send-nonsecure.html

            Well, edwin; is the U.K. Daily Mail another of those “right wing rags” you despise so much?

          • The FBI is investigating whether members of Hillary Clinton’s inner circle “cut and pasted” material from the government’s classified network so that it could be sent to her private e-mail address, former State Department security officials say. Clinton and her top aides had access to a Pentagon-run classified network that goes up to the Secret level, as well as a separate system used for Top Secret communications. The two systems — the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet) and Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System (JWICS) — are not connected to the unclassified system, known as the Non-Classified Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNet). You cannot e-mail from one system to the other, though you can use NIPRNet to send ­e-mails outside the government. Somehow, highly classified information from SIPRNet, as well as even the super-secure JWICS,

          • SHE ONLY HAD THE ONE SERVER! The ONLY WAY she COULDN’T and WOULDN’T receive ANY classified info is IF NO ONE, NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON IN A DEMOCRAT ADMINSTRATION trusted her enough to send her any… AT ALL…IN FOUR YEARS TIME AS SOS! Blind is one thing Eddie, but NUTS is a whole different deal!

          • She also had access to a secure server, couriers,sand secure cable network for secure communication. There should never have been anything sent other wise or if she was sending it would have been done on a secure network. Her unsecure server was used for her personal use or if she had used the state dept. unsecured server it would have been the same difference. the right wind needs something to slow her down from the nomination. they thing they have something here, they have given up on the rest of the scandal’s they have created.

          • ROFLMAO!! Do you ALWAYS turn EVERYTHING ass backwards? IF that WERE TRUE, the IG WOULDN’T have asked the FBI TOO investigate, as there would be NO NEED!

          • So much for progress it was the IG as in INSPECTOR GENERAL NOT the ATORNEY GENERAL (the ATTORNEY GENERAL comes into play AFTER the investigation by the FBI concludes and I AM FED THE HELL UP WITH YOUR RIDICLOUS, BRAIN DEAD, WILLFULLY BLIND,SORRY LYING ASS

          • Why don’t you quit posting jokesA ??? You are such a bore and also disgusting. Perhaps you need a woman to cheer you up, Better yet,get yourself drunk and then take a long walk on a short bridge. That might do the trick. By the way, are you posting from a mental institution????? You seem to have lost it altogether.. NO ONE IS REACTING TO YOUR BORING POSTS. AND WE ALSO ARE AWARE THAT YOU ARE GETTING PAID BY THE CLINTON CRIME FAMILY TO WRITE ALL HIS GARBAGE.

          • Not nearly as stupid and brain dead as you are DEFENDING A CRIMINAL AND VICIOUS,EVIL AND DANGEROUS FREAK. I CANNOT WAIT UNTIL SHE IS HANDCUFFED AND SENT TO THE BIG HOUSE.

          • YOU ARE A DAM NUISANCE,TO SAY THE LEAST. GO KISS THE CLINTONS’ REAR ENDS SINCE YOU ARE SO PROUD OF THESE CRIMINALS.

          • You are such a dumbass you give women a bad name. If you are a woman. You shouldn’t talk that way about the next President of the United States

          • “You’ve got several Republican chairs who are actively campaigning against Hillary Clinton” and investigating her in the House and Senate at the same time, “I think the inspector general has to be very careful not to allow himself to be used by one political party against the other in a presidential race.” The IG is a democrat.

          • Unreal, totally unreal… do tell sweet pea, that’s what I’ve told at least four, maybe five times now. BUT, on the plus side, we ARE making a TINY little bit of progress. (The BS about House and Senate investigations is just that, the ONLY investigations going on are the two the FBI are doing, one into her email and that lead to the other into the “foundation”.

          • The FBI has never been the center of the investigation, I have never seen any evidence of the foundation . just this and it certainly is not a crteditable source.( Fox reported, citing three unidentified intelligence officials.)

          • Here are two more examples of ‘edwin’ writing his own nonsensical responses:

            “The FBI has never been the center of the investigation”

            and

            “I have never seen any evidence of the foundation”

            I doubt he has the intelligence to discern what is wrong with each of these statements. 🙂

          • Check out where I caught him plagiarizing almost all of a 2006 article by CBN News’ David Brody. 🙂

          • Hey dumbass were you sitting next to her while she was acting as Sec. of State?????How do you have all this delusional information or why are you making it up???? And WHY IN THIS WORD ARE YOU DEFENDING A CRIMINAL,MURDERER,LIAR AND DISGUSTING STINKY FREAK????????????

          • After reading all your comments I would say you are describing yourself. I wouldn’t want to be setting beside a filthy mouth bit-h like you. You can’t be married no man likes that type of filth from a women. You are probably one of those hypocrites that goes to church every Sunday and twice weekly. So get lost scank

          • she was offered a unsecured server and declined. She had a secure server in the state dept. along with all the other secure types of communications

          • NO EDDIE you’ve got it BACKWARDS AGAIN! She NEVER had a government email address which is what a “state dept” server would be!

          • Howleyesque eddie reminds me of that brain dead lineral dumbass on here named rx7BJ. Anothe pathetic soul. You cant make idiots like them understand facts. Their brain doesnt accept that level of intellegence

          • Yep facts are meaningless to them, they’ve bought completely into the propaganda they’ve been spoon fed. LOL

          • Exactly, the things there are no known cures for, the willful blindness of a fanatic and/or bigot, and all other forms of stupidity!

          • Worst of all the fools in their rank and file think it’s STILL the SAME Democratic party it was…50 years ago! 50 years later and nothing has improved, but it’s STILL everyone else’s fault!

          • “She also had access to a secure server, couriers, sand {SIC} secure cable network for secure communication.”

            Of course she did, edwin – so explain why she intentionally and knowingly chose to set up her own NONSECURE private email server and use her own private email address ; thereby bypassing scrutiny by the State Department’s I.T. security office?

            While you’re at it, explain why you are a serial plagiarist.

            Don’t you realize that is both illegal AND immoral??? [Rhetorical question: both are LibSoc SJW quisling propagandist characteristics. 🙂 ]

          • Clinton explained it “It was already there,” she said of the server. “It had been there for years. It is the system that my husband’s personal office used when he got out of the White House. And so it was sitting there in the basement. It was not any trouble at all.”
            Clinton’s unusual email system was originally set up by a staffer during Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, replacing a server used by her husband, former President Bill Clinton. To bad being stupid isn’t illegal an immoral you would be a lifer

          • Yada, Yada, Yada, edwin.

            Study up:

            More Spin on Clinton Emails
            By Eugene Kiely
            Posted on September 8, 2015 | Corrected on September 8, 2015

            Hillary Clinton directly addressed questions in recent interviews about her exclusive use of a personal email account and server to conduct government business as secretary of state. But her answers only reveal part of the story:

            Clinton said her personal email account was “allowed by the State Department.” It was permitted if work emails were preserved. Federal rules required Clinton to preserve work emails before she left office, but she did not turn over her emails until 21 months after she left office.
            Clinton said “turning over my server” to the government shows “I have been as transparent as I could” about her emails. But she did so in August after the FBI opened an investigation. In March, she rejected calls to turn over the server to a neutral party, saying “the server will remain private.”
            Clinton said “everybody in government with whom I emailed knew that I was using a personal email.” But that ignores those — including President Obama — who did not know that she used it exclusively for government business.

            ‘Allowed by State Department’

            Let’s look at some of the statements that Clinton made in her interviews, beginning with whether her unusual email arrangement was “allowed by the State Department.”

            Clinton, Sept. 4: I know why the American people have questions about it. And I want to make sure I answer those questions, starting with the fact that my personal email use was fully above board. It was allowed by the State Department, as they have confirmed.

            Clinton Sept. 7: I understand why people have questions and I’m trying to answer as many of those in as many different settings as I can. What I did was allowed by the State Department. It was fully above board.

            The campaign cites a rule issued by the National Archives and Records Administration in October 2009 — eight months after Clinton became secretary of state — that said federal agencies may allow the use of personal emails under certain circumstances.

            National Archives, Oct. 2, 2009: Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system.

            At a March 3 press briefing, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf also cited the 2009 NARA rule in saying Clinton apparently complied with the rules.

            “As I said, there’s no prohibition on using this kind of email account as long as it’s preserved,” Harf said. “She has taken steps to preserve those records by providing the State Department with the 55,000 pages, so – I’m not a NARA expert, but certainly, it sounds to me like that has been completed.”

            Harf is admittedly no NARA expert, but Jason R. Baron is.

            Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle and a former director of litigation at the National Archives, told the Senate Judiciary Committee in May that “any employee’s decision to conduct all e-mail correspondence through a private e-mail network, using a non-.gov address, is inconsistent with long-established policies and practices under the Federal Records Act and NARA regulations governing all federal agencies.”

            Also, as we have written, Clinton should have turned over her emails before she left office, but she didn’t.

            NARA regulations require federal agencies to maintain an NARA-approved schedule for the disposition of federal records. The State Department Records Disposition Schedule says “incoming and outgoing correspondence and memorandums on substantive U.S. foreign policy issues” should be permanently retained “at the end of the Secretary’s tenure or sooner if necessary.”

            Clinton left office Feb. 1, 2013. She did not turn over her emails to the State Department until Dec. 5, 2014, and only after the department in October of that year requested the emails in part to respond to the congressional requests for documents related to the Benghazi attacks on Sept. 11, 2012.

            The Clinton campaign has said that she complied with NARA regulations because “more than 90% of those emails should have already been captured in the State Department’s email system before she provided them with paper copies.”

            But that assumes that the people receiving an email from Clinton properly preserved the record. Baron, the former director of litigation at NARA, told us for a previous story that Clinton “basically offloaded her burden to others” to preserve her emails. He told us Clinton was out of compliance with the regulations the day she left office.

            One last point: The Washington Post Fact Checker wrote that when she was secretary in June 2011 “a cable went out under her signature warning employees to ‘avoid conducting official Department business from your personal e-mail accounts.’ ”

            The Clinton campaign noted that that cable was sent after Google disclosed that the Gmail accounts of some government employees were being targeted by hackers originating in China — a situation Clinton described at the time as “very serious.” The cable did not say that the advice was limited to those with Gmail accounts. Asked if the campaign was suggesting that it applied only to Gmail users, Clinton spokesman Josh Schwerin said he was offering “important context” given that the department has said personal email use was permitted under certain circumstances.
            Transparency and Clinton’s Server

            In her interview with Mitchell, Clinton took responsibility for her decision to use a private email account. She also took some credit for being “as transparent as I could” in handling the email controversy.

            Clinton, Sept. 4: I take responsibility. I should’ve had two accounts — one for personal, one for work-related — and I’ve been as transparent as I could, asking all 55,000 pages be released to the public, turning over my server, looking for opportunities to testify before Congress. I’ve offered for nearly a year.

            It’s true that she asked the State Department to release her emails on March 5, but the request came three months after she gave the emails to the department and three days after the New York Times broke the story that she exclusively used a personal email system to conduct official business.

            As for her server, Clinton initially rejected suggestions that she turn it over to an independent third-party. At a March 10 press conference, Clinton said all personal emails were deleted from her server, and she rejected the suggestion that she turn her server over to an “independent arbiter” to prove that she did not destroy any work-related emails.

            Clinton, March 10: The server contains personal communications from my husband and me, and I believe I have met all of my responsibilities and the server will remain private, and I think that the State Department will be able, over time, to release all of the records that were provided.

            Five months later, on Aug. 11, Clinton directed her legal team to turn over her email server and a thumb drive containing copies of her emails to the Justice Department. “Clinton has pledged to cooperate with the government’s security inquiry,” the campaign said.

            The Justice Department review was triggered by I. Charles McCullough III, the inspector general of the intelligence community, who made a “security referral” to the department for “potential compromises of national security” after a small sampling of Clinton’s emails found four that contained classified information. None of them had classification markings. Clinton has described the situation as a typical “disagreement among various parts of the government” over whether certain parts of her email correspondence material should or should not be made public.

            The Clinton campaign told us there was no point in turning over the server earlier because there were no longer emails on it and the State Department had printed copies of all the work-related emails. The FBI security review is different, it said, because the review is a security issue. The campaign referred us to a Sept. 3 Bloomberg News story that said the FBI is examining the server for signs of security breaches.

            There is a difference, but she cannot delete emails, refuse to allow her server to be examined by an independent third party, and then accurately claim she is being “as transparent as I could.”

            ‘Everybody’ Knew?

            Clinton also told Mitchell and the Associated Press that her use of a personal email account was “fully above board,” because everyone who received an email from her knew that she was using a personal account.

            Clinton, Sept. 4: The people in the government knew that I was using a personal account … the people I was emailing to on the dot gov system certainly knew and they would respond to me on my personal email.

            Clinton, Sept. 7: It was fully above board. Everybody in the government with whom I emailed knew that I was using a personal email, and I have said it would have been a better choice to have had two separate email accounts.

            What she says is accurate, but incomplete. Those who exchanged emails with Clinton undoubtedly knew she had a personal account, but how many knew that she used it exclusively for government business? President Obama, for one, did not.

            On March 7, CBS reporter Bill Plante asked Obama when he first learned “that Hillary Clinton used an email system outside the U.S. government.” He replied, “The same time everybody else learned it through news reports.”

            Two days later, White House spokesman Josh Earnest expanded on the president’s answer. He said of course he knew her email address. “But the president was not aware of the fact that this was a personal email server and that this was the email address that she was using exclusively for all her business,” he said.

            In minimizing her unusual email arrangement, Clinton glosses over the big difference between those who knew she had a personal email account and those who knew she was using it exclusively for government business. She has used variations on this theme — claiming, for example, that previous “secretaries of state” did the “same thing,” but as we have written before only Colin Powell used personal email for official business and there’s no evidence that he maintained a personal server.

            http://www.factcheck.org/2015/09/more-spin-on-clinton-emails/

            Face facts, edwin: as a Hillary apologist/propagandist you are a big, fat FAILURE!

            “Hillary for Prison 2016” 🙂

          • she wasn’t allowed to receive classified email on your unclassified personal server. That’s is why she had a classified server, couriers and secure cable sources. you imply she only had one source of communication.

          • Eddie has this nasty allergy to… facts. The ones he doesn’t LIKE he simply ignores or pretends they don’t exist.

      • Yeah fact that Hitlary is crooked corrupt conniving lying and the brain dead minions follow her like a dog in heat. Damn sorry didnt mean to insult dogs. They are a hell of a lot smarter and loyal than this communist pig

        • How would you like it if some one talked that way about your wife or someone in your family. Just because you have political difference you don’t have to stoop as low as you do along with the rest of your right wing bloggers.

          • Boo hoo hoo edwin. Get over it you brain dead little panty wearing demonrat twat. If she had been honest caring citizen instead of a crooked corrupt lying communist pos then I would say different and if I had a family member in politics like her I would burn their ass

          • Edwin you poor pathetic stupid naive ignorant soul. Hitlsry would chew you up and shit you out if she knew your vote would make her potus. I love how blind and stupid Hitlary supporters are. You know the dead and illegals will have to vote for this bitch to win. You might want to educate yourself a little on how crooked and evil this communist witch is. Filthy minded hahaha. At least we have the countries best interest at heart unlike Hitlsry who wsnts one world order. Eddie take the blinders off and pull your head out of Hitlary’s ass and get some air. Eddie you want a family like the Clitons. I know exactly where you can move and find a family just like them. North Korea

          • Your comment doesn’t make a hell of lot sense. Just a lot of filth comment which has become the norm on this blog site. I have followed Hillary for years and nothing in your comments describe her. People lie you make me sick. Probably trying to justify your own pathetic life.

          • Awe poor edie. Yadda yadda yadda. Hey you blind fool. I have a wonderful life. Retired and loving it and if you cant see thur Hitlary’s BS then that explains how stupid the demonrat voter base has gotten. Supporting a known criminal. Hey by the way fool did Hitlary and slick willy return the 80 k plus of furnishings they stole from the White House? Pathetic how morons like you support known criminals and act like they do no wrong

          • FACT CHECKING YOUR CLAIM. Federal rules strictly limit gifts for nearly every member of the executive branch, but the exceptions include the president and vice president. They may accept gifts, due to the needs of protocol and etiquette. There are some limits, but for the most part, if you want to show your appreciation for the occupant of the White House, you can. This courtesy extends to the entire first family — and, importantly for this fact-check, if they want to keep those gifts when they leave, they can.
            The president must report gifts over a certain value; during most of the Clinton years, the amount was $250, though today it is $350. When Bill Clinton completed his term, he submitted a final disclosure form that listed roughly $190,000 in gifts.
            Clinton’s itemized list caught the eye of the Washington Post and provided plenty of fodder for the curious. People gave the president a notable quantity of golf clubs. Movie star Sylvester Stallone gave him a pair of boxing gloves. Filmmaker Steven Spielberg sent him china. And one Steve Mittman from New York gave him two sofas, an easy chair and ottoman worth $19,900.
            The problem was, Mittman and a few others included on the list said they never intended their gifts to go to the Clintons. They thought they were donating to the White House itself as part a major remodeling project in 1993.
            This is where the questions of provenance get muddy. Some gifts are intended for the government, and must stay in the government’s hands, while some are intended for the person living in the White House. But it’s not always as simple as “this is mine” and “that is Uncle Sam’s.”
            Within about two weeks of the publication of the Post article, public criticism escalated, and the Clintons announced that they would pay the government nearly $86,000 for items that were actually government property. A few days after that, they also returned about $48,000 worth of furniture (including the sofas, chair and ottoman from Mittman).
            Add that up and the government got back $134,000 out of the $190,000 the Clinton’s had declared as gifts. But as an indication of how hard it is to determine ownership, the National Park Service, which oversees the White House property, later returned a chair and an ottoman to the Clintons.
            The House investigates
            The House Committee on Government Reform looked into the fracas over the Clintons’ gifts. While its report never accused the former first family of criminal wrongdoing, it noted shortcomings in how gifts were processed, saying there was no independent assessment of gifts and that some had likely been undervalued.
            For example, lawmakers were skeptical of the estimated value of $240 for a John Quincy Adams-signed original land grant from 1826. There was also a large Coach leather travel bag, which the White House estimated at $200 but which investigators found priced at $498 to $698, and a Tiffany necklace valued at $150 but that Tiffany’s valued at $450 to $1,000.
            There were instances of a twisted paper trail in which the National Park Service thanked donors for certain items but never formally added them to the permanent White House collection, which meant the Clintons could take them for themselves or for the Clinton Library.
            The committee found that giving things to the White House and its occupants was governed by several laws and six federal offices and agencies. Its overall conclusion was that the system was too complicated and left the government vulnerable. “Since the current system is subject to abuse and political interference, there is a need for centralized accountability in one agency staffed by career employees,” it said.
            Among the aspects of the case that lawmakers found troubling was the apparent violation of the ban on soliciting gifts. It’s fine under the law to accept someone’s generosity, but you can’t tell them what you want. This came up in regards to a portion of the goods the Clintons kept — about $38,000 worth of goods given to Hillary Clinton in December 2000. That was after she won her Senate race in New York, but before she took office, at which point accepting such gifts would have violated Senate rules. Clinton had created a gift registry at Borsheim’s Fine Jewelry and Gifts. This yielded 16 rimmed soup bowls worth $2,352 and a soup tureen worth $1,365, among other items.
            Even before the registry episode, the White House had retained an interior decorator who, according to the report, coordinated 43 of the 45 furniture gifts received over the Clintons’ eight years.
            Kathleen Clark focuses on government ethics law at Washington University in St. Louis. For her, that interior decorator raised a flag. “I don’t know how you coordinate gifts without soliciting them,” Clark said.
            Ultimately, the first family retained 227 of 14,770 gifts given over the eight years.
            The accusation of theft
            The viral image accuses the Clintons of theft. However, their public declaration of all the things they were taking makes it harder to call what they did “stealing.”
            “Calling the Clintons’ actions ‘stealing’ or ‘theft’ is hyperbolic,” Clark said. “It’s hard to take that language seriously in this context.”
            Richard Painter served as the chief White House ethics lawyer in the George W. Bush administration. He now teaches at the University of Minnesota Law School. Painter said the paper trail is “strange.”
            “Perhaps it was stuff that was given to them and they turned it over to the government and then changed their mind and treated it as a gift to them and put it on the 278 (disclosure form) and took it with them,” Painter said. “That is more debatable, depending on the intent of the donor.”
            The congressional report notes that there were some instances in which donor wishes were disregarded, but it also describes confusion in defining ownership and disposing of the gifts.
            To the extent that the Clintons were forced to pay for or return certain items, that was not under penalty of law. It would be more accurate to say that they quickly bowed to public pressure.
            The Reagans had issues too
            As an aside, we’ll note that the problem of gifts to the first family was not a new one.
            For instance, the IRS investigated President Ronald Reagan and First Lady Nancy Reagan in 1989. At issue were gowns worth as much as $25,000 and diamond jewelry that had been loaned to Nancy Reagan. A year before, the White House Ethics Office found that the president could accept a $2.5 million home in Bel Air, Calif., purchased on his behalf by undisclosed friends. However, the Reagans ultimately repaid the donors.
            Our ruling
            A viral graphic said that Hillary Clinton was forced to return about $200,000 worth of furniture, artwork and china that she had stolen from the White House. The statement contains several inaccuracies.
            The Clintons returned about $48,000 in furniture, and they paid the government about $86,000 for other items. Any way you count it, the $200,000 figure is too high.
            According to top ethics lawyers, it’s at least debatable — and at worst hyperbolic — to say the Clintons “stole” the items. A congressional investigation found poor tracking of ownership and final disposition of gifts, which makes it hard to speak definitively of wrongdoing. In fact, two items the Clintons returned were ultimately sent back to them. Finally, it’s worth making clear that the “force” they responded to was political pressure, not legal jeopardy.

            Accusations of stealing are serious and require a high threshold of evidence, unmet by the charges in this over-the-top graphic. We rate the claim Mostly False.

          • Keep dreaming that the clitons are honest. It just shows how stupid the demonrat voter base has gotten eddie boy and yes the clitons are crooks. Have a nice day Hitlary minion

          • Edwin you have proof they didnt? Didnt think so so keep being the little Cliton minion puppets. Just like demonrats like yourself blaming Repubs for everything. Good luck in Nov. You will need it. Have a nice evening Cliton minion

          • I would gladly be Clintons minion unless you mean the Greek definition. I actually feel sorry for the Republican party that they couldn’t come up with a decent nominee for their party. There are some come candidates n the party but the Right wing and Tea Baggers have ripped the party so far apart , nobody wants to go through all the crap you have to endure to run. Clinton is a good example on the democrat side. There are all kind’s of politician’s now and in the past that are in prison. If you are guilty of wrong doing, you will pay but not for innuendos. 2 former Governor’s of Illinois in prison right now. Anything the Clinton’s have been accused of has been investigated over and over. In America you are innocent until or unless proven guilty,

          • Eddie pretty damn sad if Hitlary is all you have to support. We need someone who is not a career crook oops politician. Someone who can run their campaign without help from big banks and corporations. Trump is that person. He speaks what Americans have been wanting to hear for decades not the same BS lines Hitlary Bernie Cruz and the rest of the puppet politicians. Hitlary’s comment to illegals. Amnesty will be top priority for her. I heard that before from Obozo pandering for votes. Has he done anything for illegals? Nope all lies. So keep supporting a known crook criminal. One more thing gifts are one thing. Clitons stole White House furnishings. Complements of CNN news

          • Hillary is the best qualified to be President from day one.Trump hasn’t needed to spend money like more traditional candidates to reach voters. He’s benefited from a deluge of media coverage that has allowed him to drive the debate almost from the moment he entered the race in mid-June. His company has declared bankruptcy 4 times. His father was a multi-millionaire in the real estate business. Nice start for Trump. There are millions of bigots and racist in the country that have had to retreat to the shadows, With Trump they can again express their bigotry through Trump. He will get all of the bigot votes which he probably has topped out at 30+% .FACT CHECKING YOUR CLAIM. Federal rules strictly limit gifts for nearly every member of the executive branch, but the exceptions include the president and vice president. They may accept gifts, due to the needs of protocol and etiquette. There are some limits, but for the most part, if you want to show your appreciation for the occupant of the White House, you can. This courtesy extends to the entire first family — and, importantly for this fact-check, if they want to keep those gifts when they leave, they can.
            The president must report gifts over a certain value; during most of the Clinton years, the amount was $250, though today it is $350. When Bill Clinton completed his term, he submitted a final disclosure form that listed roughly $190,000 in gifts.
            Clinton’s itemized list caught the eye of the Washington Post and provided plenty of fodder for the curious. People gave the president a notable quantity of golf clubs. Movie star Sylvester Stallone gave him a pair of boxing gloves. Filmmaker Steven Spielberg sent him china. And one Steve Mittman from New York. In a statement released Monday, Clinton’s transition office said every item they accepted was identified by the White House gift office as a present to them. They said none of the gifts taken was on a curator’s list of official White House property.
            “Gifts did not leave the White House without the approval of the White House usher’s and curator’s offices,” the statement said. “Of course, if the White House now determines that a cataloging error occurred, … any item in question will be returned.”
            Instead of waiting for the issue to be resolved, the Clintons returned the items.

          • Where did your info come from MSNBC CNN Liberal media at its finest. I dont believe anythi g liberal media says. Too many lies. Now what about all the people who were associated with the Clitons that ended up dead. 90% were ruled suicide. I say BS and Hitlary is not the best qualified for potus. She has been caught in too many lies but you keep dreaming that this crooked corrupt conniving lying evil bitch is best. Idiots are entitled to their opinions. Never thought of Cliton supporters as being very bright.

          • Killary is a scumbag as well as a criminal with a scandalous background. She and her sex-crazed husband should have been in prison years ago but because of their massive wealth, they were able to pay people off to keep their mouths shut. yThey are still paying people off and anyone who gets in their way are found dead a few says or weeks later. You better watch as you may be on their list..

          • Trump is the voice for all the bigots and racist that have gone into the closet over the past few years. They can come out now and their mouthpiece will speak for them. Trumps multi-millionaire real estate father got Trump started.
            Donald Trump often says that he does not get enough credit for self-funding his presidential campaign. But as his recent financial disclosure reveals, he is not funding most of it.
            Instead, the majority of his campaign funding comes from donors. This quarter, the campaign received 73,942 “unsolicited donations” totaling about $3.7 million, according to a release from the campaign. That accounts for most of the $5.8 million the campaign has taken in to date.
            Trump has contributed to financing his campaign through in-kind gifts and loans.
            In the third quarter, he made about $100,000 in in-kind contributions to his campaign.
            That’s in addition to the $1.8 million Trump previously loaned the campaign. Trump can pay himself back for the loan with campaign funds at any point.
            At the same time, Trump’s businesses have charged significant rent to the campaign. The campaign paid $144,000 for rent in the third quarter to Trump Tower Commercial LLC, Trump Restaurants LLC and the Trump Corp.
            On the campaign trail, Trump regularly portrays his campaign as a self-funded one. “I’m self-funding my own campaign,” he said at a rally last week in Las Vegas.
            “If I lose, I was stupid,” he said. “Because I don’t think I get enough credit for self-funding.” Trumps success can be contributed to the media. He says something stupid everyday and the media can’t wait to get it on the air. He has got millions in free media exposure. That also is not like financing his own campaign.

          • Hey edie how much has Hitlary conned out of people? Look dweeb you vote for your crooked corrupt lying hag or a full blown socialist sanders and I will bote for who I believe can bring this country back to what she used to be. A once great and powerful nation that other countries looked up to. Now we are a country of panty wearing wussies thanks to the chump occupying the White House

          • In case you never noticed we are still the most powerful nation in the world. We just quit bragging about it and not rub are allies nose in it. In case you never notice we are at least 45% a socialist country and have been for 50 years. We don’t need another knee jerk cowboy like Bush who has screwed the Mideast up so bad it my never get straighten out. There is no proof of corruption of Hillary, just 40 years of putting up with people like you who will believe anything and a corrupt right wing media that will gladly pander to idiots like you. You call Pres. Obama a wuss when he is trying to promote peace through diplomacy. The only thing the right knows is war.How many more young Americans have to die for worthless causes and spend the rest of their lives with 1 or 2 less limbs. There is no one left on the Republican side that has any Foreign experience or domestic political experience that can run this country. Sec. Clinton will be the next POTUS. Suck it up and live with it.

          • Edie and you act like demonrats arent involved with wars or support them which Hitlary the witch approved. Nope the wusdies socialist and chumps are nrain dead jackasses like you that would support a known crook criminal and communist supporter which by the way Hitlary said that on Bill Maher show a couple of years ago when asked whats the best way to run a country. Amd yes other countries look at us as pansies thanks to the inept muslim pig occupying the White House and keep dreaming if you think Hitlary will win. Pathetic how naive snd ignorant Hitlary supporters are. Have a nice day Hitlary puppet. Ill bet you aee even in support of gun control when we gave over 20,000 gun laws on the books but never let a liberal lunatic push for feel good gun laws that dont work. Dont believe me look at Chicago and other cities states with yough gun laws. Highest crime rat in the country

          • Not interested in commenting on any more of your stupid ass remarks. You are a hateful, bigoted racist. I have heard enough of your ignorance.

          • Awe poor little panty wearing butt pumping liberal lunatic. Ignorance runs with liberal lunatics like you edie. Have a nice evening ass wipe

          • A statement issued by Mr. Clinton’s office said that all the chairs, tables, rugs and other furnishings taken for their homes in Washington and Chappaqua, N.Y., had been registered as personal gifts by the White House gift office.
            ”Every item accepted by the Clintons was identified by the White House gift office as a gift to them,” the statement said, adding that the administrative staff at the White House had ”reviewed each of the items against the official list of White House property to ensure every gift was properly handled; none of these items was on that list.”
            The park service handles permanent donations, officials said. Personal gifts to the president and his family are recorded separately through the White House gift office.

          • Awe my lord. Now I know for sure you are a wacked out liberal lunatic if you believe anything that comes out of that commie state to be true. Damn thanks for the laugh. Another pathetic fool. Hows cuckoo Cuomo doing. New York what snd arrogant cesspool of assholes. You mean you actually believe that communust garbage New York Times puts out. Hahahahaha lmfao.

          • Way before than from the right wing rags and media you obviously rely on . Goodbye see you at Hillary’s inauguration

          • Hahahahaha lmfao damn edie stop. Im anout to puss in my pants from laughing so hard. Wait until the FBI gets done with Hitlary. She wont make it. Her health will kill her first. Damn wishful thinking. Make sure you wear you Hitlary puppet costume to show support. You Hitlary puppets are a joke. Have a nice day edie and dont forget to change your panties

        • “Yeah fact that Hitlary is crooked corrupt conniving lying and the brain dead minions follow her like a dog in heat.”

          You mean like “brain dead minion” and LibSoc SJW Democrat ‘edwin’ here? 🙂

      • All anyone hears from you is hate of White men and America, your a sheep, goat and pig raping sand monkey from the middle east, so go play with yourself rag head little god worshiping piece of pigs dung.

        • How do you really feel? I’m hoping you meant something a little different than a god worshiping as a bad thing. There are plenty of God worshiping people who make pretty darn good sense on this Web site. Also that don’t care for Hillary.

          • He used the little, “g” Bill and for good reason. A goodly number of us have seen the nastiest diatribe from that puke face Redbutt as you can determine from his never changing posts with nothing more than malicious intent. Most of have learned by now to ignore his rants because answering him only gets you more of the same as noted above. This time though, The Fox decide to give him a double dose of his own medicine. Looks like he won the debate hands down. P.S…Your note about the capital, “G” though is well stated and applied by most of who care for civil dialog.

          • I told ya, Bill. It was only a matter of time before that goat humper realized that you guys were making him relevant by answering his diseased mind whose birth certificate is an apology letter from the condom factory. Sit back and amuse yourself now. There’s more of it to come.

          • god worshiping not God worshiping as I’m a evangelist, sometimes pastor and Bible teacher twice a week, little god and not the God of Creation. Hope that explains my comment. God Bless and Shalom

          • U R nothing but a wolf. a real preacher would hate others. he would leave it up 2 a real GOD. not yo god. wolf-fox-face

          • Your god sand monkey is the god of Islam and satan himself and your continued lie’s and hate show it with your every lying comment, your the sheep, goat and pig raping rag head from hell.

          • The majority of wars since the beginning of time have been caused by religions and its followers. So if “mostly people without God kill people”, then you are saying that our armed forces or cops in the streets are godless correct? I guess I couldn’t disagree, well from your prospective anyway.

        • Y want U really tell the truth about yo tramp wife leaving U fox-face. U know dat it was because U were caught molesting yo snake-mouth daughters. U stupid fake preacher.

        • FYI folks he ISN’T black he’s a chicano who HATES BOTH whites AND blacks and so tries to stir up as much racial hatred between the two as he can with his trolling. Ain’t that right …SPEEDY?

          • When it walks like a Islamist, talks like a Islamist he is a Islamist and don’t think he has the brains of the pigs, goats and sheep he rapes daily.

      • Meet you any time “red man” ! Missoula Mt. any bar downtown ! I’m thinking your real name is “yellow man” just like our disbarred dog-eating “down low” racist muslim loving maggot in the White House ! Just ask for Fred Hayes ! an I bet you black as coalies A$$ !

    • Have you met most white folks? How can you make such a blanket racist comment?
      If I said most people of color are murderers. (Though I do not believe they are) What kind of response would I get? Redman. Change your name to Richard Cranium.After all. That’s what you are.

      • The rudeman hates EVERYONE including himself and he won’t be happy until EVERYONE is just as miserable as he is. Too bad he can NEVER succeed in that!

      • Yes, billy black heart. I have met lots of white-folks down through the years who have told me what has happen 2 dem in the care of their own family how dat their pappy or brother or uncle raped em. but, as I’ve said B 4. yall white-folks live deep in yo denial of yo hate and inbreeding. white-folks ruined america

        • Hmm let me see…… I’m trying………..nope……….. I’m really trying to see your point of view. I just can’t get my head that far up my ass.

          • OK. here it is hillbilly wit the black heart. 98% of the white-folks in america have ruined it because of their greed, hate, stupidity, gun worshiping, and incest.

          • Let’s break down your comment.
            Hillbilly ….people who climbed down the side of mountains . Drilled a hole . Put a stick of dynamite in that said hole. Lit the fuse.climbed back up the mountain. Racing the explosion just so we can have roads in a modern world. While other ethnicity people sat back and collected welfare. Hillbillies provided for their families.
            Wit(t). Yes I have been accused several times of being witty.
            Black heart. You have no clue who I am or what I am. Or how my heart is. Though my avatar shows you my physical being. Unlike you who Refuses to show their face. I have honestly and I am not afraid to show you who I am. I am not a coward like your scum sucking self.
            Greed If you call having a job all their lives supporting the welfare cases. If that’s greed.
            Yes. White people are greedy.
            Hate. Sorry. Your the only one spewing hate. That’s all you ever do.
            Stupidity. Yes we are. Stupid for tolerating the government taking our hard earned money to support pork programs. Bring in terrorist. Paying 16 million dollars for the president and his family to vacation. Supporting 4th and 5th generation welfare families.
            Gun worshiping. We don’t worship guns. Just because we support and believe in the constitution does not mean we worship guns. It means we can hunt and provide for our families. We don’t get a welfare check. We can and will protect ourselves from bad people breaking into our houses and raping our wives and daughters. And in your case. Our Sons. By the way. More gun violence is committed by other races than by whites. White have the least amount of gun crime incidences than all other races combined.
            Incest I’m lost for words….except. at least we know who our father is. He didn’t skip out of town the minute he heard mom was pregnant.

            So…Thank you for the compliment

          • Wow that was an intelligent answer. Did you come up with that all by yourself or did your daddy help you? Oh wait! You don’t know who your father is. Do you? Actually I am a Christian white male mid fifties professional Christian with Christian values and Christian morals. So there you are. Like every other time you open up your government cheese hole. You spew out stupidity

  1. Illinois, Chicago especially, has a history of corruption that goes back decades. I would be very surprised not to see her name on their ballot.

  2. She is under investigation for fraud, money laundering and a host of other serious charges. Who the hell would want her on the ballot?

    • The brain brain dead dims/Communists, they need to finish off the final transformation of America. I have no doubt the hildabeast would be Hussein Obamao, part 2

      • You’re on to something there TXmissy. The dimwitcrats and their collective cartel of freeloaders, misfits and hangers on elected a Muslim for president and Hiliary is now trying to get elected the same way without converting completely.

          • Mr. Rowland, there’s an abundance of research behind my comment. I suppose it did sound snarky, but I’m sick at heart at what’s happened to our country and just fed up with the liberals. If you can name me one time Obama has told the truth about anything, or one time he’s favored Americans OVER the radical Muz lims…I’d be amazed to hear it. I do appreciate your comment above though.

          • One time? Well sadly he HAS told the truth but many weren’t listening. He told the truth AFTER he was in office for his second term about being a Muslim and his Islamist agenda.

          • We obviously hear with different ears as I have heard no lies form our president. I too am sick at heart about things but I place the blame for the present on those who took over our country 50 years ago as they still pull the strings of presidents. Shame on us for allowing that transition to stand at the time, but we did. We had two other warnings in the ’60’s with the murders of MLK and RFK and we still tucked our suburban heads and allowed our way of life to be taken, and just now the people are outraged at the loss blaming today for the steal…not true, it happened long ago. We went blindly ahead trusting the un-trustable and building now on the lie for the entire time. We have allowed the propaganda and spin and lies to divide us just as is planned, a house divided cannot stand. Partisan is the way they want us, battling each other at every turn when it doesn’t matter, the military industrial complex will do as it pleases with no oversight of any kind. They create our enemies so that our fear will make us controllable, a game, with no regard for human life or a constitution. If you ever visit a liberal site you will find that what the left says about the right is what the right says about the left it is a vicious cycle of internet squabbling that accomplishes nothing but keeps us angry with each other, which is how I came to be rude to you and more so about your comments. It keeps us busy and out of the way building hate for the other side and as I said really accomplishes nothing. Until we see and fight together to rid the world of those fascists who truly run our country and the world, we are doomed to be puppets and sheep.

        • h m Rowland, and you’re really smart because you don’t even know the difference between “your” and “you’re”? Here’s laughing at you, kid!

          • ron buice, so you think anyone like Txmissy that doesn’t agree with your political thinking is stupid? How stupid is that? And I see that you’re another one that doesn’t know a first name, initial or last name starts with a capitol letter. Just trying to be a rogue, huh? Not to mention “you’re” isn’t spelled with a quotation mark but with an apostrophe. Wow! You are pathetic!

          • lol yeper….I’m gonna delete that comment to Txmissy, wasn’t nice and wasn’t called for it just hit me as blather and that’s ok she’s allowed. I blather, sometimes. Like now. I do know that your and you’re thing often it seems like, I know the difference but I guess as I write in my head that I hear ‘your’ as I’m thinking and type it instead of ‘you’re’, I really need to be more careful. I never miss with there, their, and they’re though….that’s what $80k for a masters degree will get ya though, peace!

          • h m rowland, how very nice of you! I’m sure Txmissy will appreciate the deletion and the admission that it ”wasn’t nice and wasn’t called for”. My belief is that it takes a real “stand up” kind of guy to admit he’s wrong! Kudo’s to you! We all make misteakes! LOL! Peace!

          • Wow Don….can’t say I know what you were trying to say…..do you know the difference between your and you’re?

      • Is that the way you think you can win an election by destroying your opponent with false accusations , insults slurs and the like. I guess when you don’t have any ideas of your own that’s all you got left.

        • You obviously haven’t been paying attention to what’s happened to this country over the past 8 years. Do your own research. I did.

          • I have done extensive research from reliable fact checking sources not the right wing bigoted news sources, right wing talk radio, TV(Fox), blogs and right wing published material. The right seems to control these sources. The only way the Republican’s can win in 2016 is to discredit Hillary Clinton anyway they can. I get that. I will talk real slow. Sen. Clinton had a personal server she used for business and personal use as US Senator. When she became Sec. of State. She choose to use her same unsecure server for everyday business and personal use instead of using the unsecure server provided by the State department for everyday business and personal use. It was allowed by the State Dept. but not recommended. If she had decided to have used the State Dept. unsecured server it would have been no different than using her own server. The same email would have been sent on either server. The sender or recipient would not have know a difference or would have it made a difference. As for classified email, that would have been sent and received on a secured server, but more often by wire/cables or courier. You just don’t receive or send classified and sensitive messages on a unsecured server. You are assuming she never received messages on the Dept’s secured server or cables/wire or from couriers. As far as deleting email on her own server, I do that every day and you probably do to. She has said repeatedly that she didn’t send or receive any email marked classified. The FBI has verified that so far. They found in their opinion that a few of the 55,000 emails probably should have been marked classified when sent or received. There has always been different opinions as to what is classified and what is not. A large percentage of material need not be classified as classified. Its done just to cover someone’s a-s. I see nothing wrong as to the way she handled her email and the FBI seems to agree so far. There is no FBI probe against Clinton and the classified question is about being classified after the fact. I don’t believe a charge like that would hold up in any court in America, You can listen to Limbaugh, Fox News and some right wing politician’s and think she committed murder, but they are fighting for survival of the Republican party. One investigator said that “loudest and leakiest participants” in a process of bureaucratic infighting for withholding the exchanges. The documents, he said, originated in the State Department’s unclassified system before they ever reached Clinton, and “in at least one case, the emails appear to involve information from a published news article.”
            “This appears to be overclassification run amuck..

          • I have done my research from independent fact checking sources, not the right wing hate sources you find on right wing hate radio, TV(Fox), right wing blogs and right wing hate publications. I pay to much attention especially on the hate blogs. The only the way Republican’s can win in 2016 is to discredit Hillary Clinton anyway they can. I get that. I will talk real slow. Sen. Clinton had a personal server she used for business and personal use as US Senator. When she became Sec. of State. She choose to use her same unsecure server for everyday business and personal use instead of using the unsecure server provided by the State department for everyday business and personal use. It was allowed by the State Dept. but not recommended. If she had decided to have used the State Dept. unsecured server it would have been no different than using her own server. The same email would have been sent on either server. The sender or recipient would not have know a difference or would have it made a difference. As for classified email, that would have been sent and received on a secured server, but more often by wire/cables or courier. You just don’t receive or send classified and sensitive messages on a unsecured server. You are assuming she never received messages on the Dept’s secured server or cables/wire or from couriers. As far as deleting email on her own server, I do that every day and you probably do to. She has said repeatedly that she didn’t send or receive any email marked classified. The FBI has verified that so far. They found in their opinion that a few of the 55,000 emails probably should have been marked classified when sent or received. There has always been different opinions as to what is classified and what is not. A large percentage of material need not be classified as classified. Its done just to cover someone’s a-s. I see nothing wrong as to the way she handled her email and the FBI seems to agree so far. There is no FBI probe against Clinton and the classified question is about being classified after the fact. I don’t believe a charge like that would hold up in any court in America, You can listen to Limbaugh, Fox News and some right wing politician’s and think she committed murder, but they are fighting for survival of the Republican party. One investigator said that “loudest and leakiest participants” in a process of bureaucratic infighting for withholding the exchanges. The documents, he said, originated in the State Department’s unclassified system before they ever reached Clinton, and “in at least one case, the emails appear to involve information from a published news article.”
            “This appears to be overclassification run amuck..

          • Last time to talk to you. You’re simply repeating Clinton’s own talking points. The FBI doesn’t agree with your version. Why you simply keep parroting her lies I don’t understand, but in the face of all the evidence to the contrary, you do. Try watching the hearings on C-Span, or is that too right wing for you. There’s no need for you to reply with the same old talking points. Stay in your little bubble, but even you will see the devastation that’s being done to America, only it’ll be way too late by then.

          • If you want the truth it is an exhausting endeavor. I have given you a list of fact and fiction you can fact check on you own if you are really seeking the truth. FACT: None Of The Emails Sent To Clinton Were Labeled As “Classified” Or “Top Secret”
            FACT: Emails Originated In State Dept. System, And Questions About Retroactive Classification Would Have Occurred Regardless Of Clinton’s Server Use
            FACT: Experts Have Debunked Any Comparison Between Clinton’s Email Use And David Petraeus’ Crimes
            FACT: IG Referral To Justice Department Was Not Criminal, And FBI Isn’t Targeting Clinton Herself
            Intelligence Community IG Says Two Emails From Clinton’s Server Should Be Marked “Top Secret”
            Intelligence Community Inspector General Says Two Emails From Clinton’s Server Contain “Top Secret” Information. The inspector general for the Intelligence Community (ICIG), I. Charles McCullough, reportedly informed leaders of key congressional oversight committees that two classified emails previously discovered on Clinton’s server contain top secret information. As McClatchy reported:
            The inspector general for the Intelligence Community notified senior members of Congress that two of four classified emails discovered on the server Clinton maintained at her New York home contained material deemed to be in one of the highest security classifications – more sensitive than previously known.
            The notice came as the State Department inspector general’s office acknowledged that it is reviewing the use of “personal communications hardware and software” by Clinton’s former top aides after requests from Congress. [McClatchy DC, 8/11/15]
            State Department: It Remains Unclear Whether Material In Two Emails Should Be Retroactively Classified. NBC noted that the State Department is still working with the intelligence community to determine whether the information in the two emails should in fact be labeled as classified:
            Clinton aides have maintained that nothing on her server was classified at the time she saw it, suggesting that classified messages were given the label after the fact.
            John Kirby, a spokesman for the State Department, said that was the case with two emails, adding that it remained unclear “whether, in fact, this material is actually classified.”
            “Department employees circulated these emails on unclassified systems in 2009 and 2011, and ultimately some were forwarded to Secretary Clinton,” Kirby said Tuesday. “They were not marked as classified.” [NBC News, 8/12/15]
            MYTH: Clinton Received Emails Marked As “Top Secret”
            Fox Anchor Bret Baier: “‘Top Secret’ Was Marked On The Emails” Sent To Clinton. During the August 11 edition of Special Report, host Bret Baier claimed that “‘top secret’ was marked on the emails” that Clinton received during her time as secretary of state:
            MIKE EMANUEL: The breaking news of the hour is that the intelligence inspector general has told top lawmakers on Capitol Hill that two of those four classified emails from Hillary Clinton’s personal server were top secret in nature. And they’re still studying the other two to figure out what the relevant classification should be. Bret?
            BRET BAIER: ‘Top secret’ marked on the emails. FBI inquiry obviously already ongoing to classified information improperly stored, they said, on her private server. And also, Mike, a thumb drive held by her attorney?
            EMANUEL: Well that’s absolutely correct. All of her emails have been stored by her personal attorney. And a lot of folks on Capitol Hill have been asking, why is that still out there? Why is that not controlled by the intelligence community or by the State department, this existing in the possession of a personal attorney. And so lots more questions on Capitol Hill and throughout the intelligence community this evening. [Fox News, Special Report, 8/11/15]
            NBC’s Andrea Mitchell: ICIG “Contradicted Clinton’s Repeated Claim That Nothing On Those Private Emails Was Classified.” On the August 12 edition of NBC’s Today, Andrea Mitchell argued that the ICIG’s statement “contradicted” Clinton’s “repeated past denials”:
            ANDREA MITCHELL: More controversy for Hillary Clinton today indeed. Despite her repeated past denials, the intelligence community’s Inspector General now says two of her emails should have been classified ‘top secret,’ the highest level of U.S. intelligence, even as the FBI is finally getting control of that private server.
            VOICEOVER OF MITCHELL: Hillary Clinton, in New Hampshire Tuesday, has aides confirm she has turned over her private server to the FBI. In addition, her attorney David Kendall gave the FBI two thumb drives containing her emails. All of this, as the intelligence community’s watchdog contradicted Clinton’s repeated claim that nothing on those private emails was classified.
            [CLIP OF HILLARY CLINTON: I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified materials.]
            MITCHELL: Clinton has said there was no classified markings on any of her emails.
            [CLIP OF CLINTON: I am confident that I have never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received.]
            MITCHELL: But the Inspector General has now told Congress two of Clinton’s emails should have been classified ‘top secret,’ with code words indicating electronic eavesdropping from satellites, so sensitive it could not be shared with foreign allies. [NBC, Today, 8/12/15]
            FACT: None Of The Emails Sent To Clinton Were Labeled As “Classified” Or “Top Secret”
            Government Officials: None Of The Emails Were Marked As “Classified” When They Were Sent. The Washington Post reported that when the ICIG first “found information that should have been designated as classified” in four emails from Clinton’s server — two of which he now says contain “top secret” information — government officials acknowledged that the emails were not marked as classified when they were sent (emphasis added):
            The Justice Department said Friday that it has been notified of a potential compromise of classified information in connection with the private e-mail account that Hillary Rodham Clinton used while serving as secretary of state.
            A Justice official said the department had received a “referral” on the matter, which the inspector general of the intelligence agencies later acknowledged came from him.
            The inspector general, I. Charles McCullough III, said in a separate statement that he had found information that should have been designated as classified in four e-mails out of a “limited sample” of 40 that his agency reviewed. As a result, he said, he made the “security referral,” acting under a federal law that requires alerting the FBI to any potential compromises of national security information.
            Officials acknowledged that none of the e-mails reviewed so far contain information that was marked classified when they were sent. But a new inquiry would prolong the political controversy Clinton is facing over her un­or­tho­dox e-mail system. [The Washington Post, 7/24/15]
            IG Memo On Classified Information In Emails: “None Of The Emails … Had Classification Or Dissemination Markings.” A memo from the ICIG clearly stated that “none of the emails we reviewed had classification or dissemination markings”:
            Since the referenced 25 June 2015 notification, we were informed by State FOIA officials that there are potentially hundreds of classified emails within the approximately 30,000 provided by former Secretary Clinton. We note that none of the emails we reviewed had classification or dissemination markings, but some included IC-derived classified information and should have been handled as classified, appropriately marked, and transmitted via a secure network. Further, my office’s limited sampling of 40 of the emails revealed four contained classified IC information which should have been marked and handled at a SECRET level. [Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, 7/23/15]
            MYTH: Emails Weren’t Marked As “Classified” Because Clinton Used A Private Server Instead Of State Dept. Email
            Fox & Friends’ Steve Doocy: Emails “Were Never Classified” Because Clinton Used A Private Server Rather Than The State Department’s Email System. Throughout the August 12 edition of Fox & Friends, co-host Steve Doocy repeatedly blamed the lack of classification on Clinton’s use of a private server instead of “the State Department email system,” arguing the emails “were never classified because she never submitted it” (emphasis added):
            STEVE DOOCY: The problem here is the fact that she didn’t want her bosses at the White House to know what she was writing about, it is perceived.
            ANDREW NAPOLITANO: She also didn’t want her colleagues in the State Department to know.
            DOOCY: Right. So she had her own server, which is, you know, against protocol. Her spokespeople, and she herself has said, you know, it wasn’t classified at the time. But that ignores how the process works. The reason you use the State Department email system is so that it is classif – it is vetted before you hit ‘send.’
            NAPOLITANO: She is probably going to argue that because the phrase, boom, ‘top secret’ was not stamped on each document, it wasn’t top secret. That’s not what the law says. Before every person in the federal government, from the president to a file clerk, gets a national security clearance, they have a 30 minute in-person interview with an FBI agent who explains, if there’s doubt about whether it’s classified or not, it’s classified.
            DOOCY: Let me just add this one thing. It was never classified because she never submitted it. [Fox News, Fox & Friends, 8/12/15]
            FACT: Emails Originated In State Dept. System And Questions About Retroactive Classification Would Have Occurred Regardless Of Clinton’s Server Use
            Emails Originated With State Department Employees And Were Forwarded To Clinton. The State Department’s statement on the retroactive “top secret” designation made clear that the emails at issue originated with State Department employees, not Clinton herself:
            The following is attributable to Spokesperson John Kirby:
            “The State Department takes seriously its obligations to protect sensitive information, holding its employees to a high standard of compliance with regulations and procedures.
            “The Intelligence Community has recommended that portions of two of the four emails identified by the Intelligence Community’s Inspector General should be upgraded to the Top Secret level. Department employees circulated these emails on unclassified systems in 2009 and 2011 and ultimately some were forwarded to Secretary Clinton. They were not marked as classified.
            “These emails have not been released to the public. While we work with the Director of National Intelligence to resolve whether, in fact, this material is actually classified, we are taking steps to ensure the information is protected and stored appropriately.” [Twitter.com, 8/11/15]
            Clinton Campaign: Emails Originated From “Unclassified .Gov Email System.” A fact sheet released by the presidential campaign for the former secretary of state explains that the emails at issue originated on “the unclassified .gov email system”:
            Would this issue not have arisen if she used a state.gov email address?
            Even if Clinton’s emails had been on a government email address and government device, these questions would be raised prior to public release.
            While State Department’s review of her 55,000 emails brought the issue to the Inspectors Generals’ attentions, the four emails were on the unclassified .gov email system. They were not on the separate, closed system used by State Department for handling classified communications. [hillaryclinton.com, “Updated: The Facts About Hillary Clinton’s Emails,” accessed 8/12/15]
            Vox: Whether Or Not Emails Should Have Been Marked Classified Is Part Of “Bureaucratic Turf War.” Vox pointed out how the intra-agency disagreement over whether the emails were appropriately categorized “is a bureaucratic fight about how the State Department has handled the emails, not about Hillary Clinton” (emphasis added):
            The State Department has been ordered by a federal judge to make public the 55,000 pages of emails Clinton turned over to the agency. So the State Department has Freedom of Information Act experts sifting through the documents to make sure that no information will be released that is either classified or sensitive (meaning not technically classified but also not covering material that the government doesn’t want in the public domain).
            This has caused a bureaucratic turf war between the department and the intelligence community, which believes at least one email that’s already been released contains classified information and that hundreds of others in the full set may also have material that’s not ready for public consumption. For a couple of months, the inspectors general of the State Department and the combined intelligence community agencies have been battling Patrick Kennedy, the lead State Department official, over who has access to the documents and the authority to release or withhold them.
            Now, according to the Times and other publications, the IG team is asking the Justice Department to get involved in reviewing whether State has mishandled the emails. If Clinton was sending information that was, or should have been, classified — and knew that it was, or should have been, classified — that’s a problem. But no one has accused her of that so far. Given the anodyne nature of what she sent in the emails we’ve already seen, it’s entirely possible, perhaps even likely, that any sensitive information was sent to Clinton, not by her (though it’s not clear whether forwarding such emails would constitute a legal issue for her). [Vox, 7/28/15]
            8/11/15] CONTINUTED ON FOLLOWING COMMENT

          • ( CONT. FROM PAGE ONE) MYTH: Hillary Clinton’s Email Use Is Comparable To David Petraeus’ Crimes
            Doocy: Clinton’s Email Use Is “The Same Thing That David Petraeus Pleaded Guilty To.” On the August 12 edition of Fox News’ Fox & Friends, Doocy hyped the debunked claim that Clinton’s email use was similar to Gen. David Petraeus’ illegal mishandling of confidential information:
            DOOCY: Big question is — Will this Department of Justice go ahead and fully prosecute? Because, keep in mind, she had unauthorized, for a home server, top secret documents, which was a direct violation of the U.S. laws. It’s the same that David Petraeus pleaded guilty to. He had the same stuff at his house. She had at it at her house. He got, you know, they ran him up the flag pole, will they do the same for her? [Fox News, Fox & Friends,8/12/15]
            Fox Judicial Analyst Implies Clinton’s Email Use Is Worse Than Petraeus’ Crimes. Appearing on the August 12 edition of Fox & Friends, senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano claimed “it’s a grave situation” for Hillary Clinton, arguing that Gen. Petraeus only had “the lowest level materials in a desk drawer” while Clinton “had top secret materials in the server in her barn”:
            NAPOLITANO: Here’s why it’s a grave situation. A federal judge ordered the State Department to reveal — to make public — emails she had given back to the State Department. The recipients of those e-mails was the inspectors general of State Department and of the intelligence community. They randomly sampled 40 of them. Among the 40, they found four that were classified.
            They then revealed that they then sent that to FBI to commence either a criminal or a national security investigation, and they sent it to the Senate and House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees. Last night they revealed that two of the four were top secret. What does top secret mean? The government has three classifications — the highest is top secret. Meaning if it’s revealed, it could cause grave harm to national security. The middle is secret, meaning if it’s revealed, it could cause serious harm to national security. The bottom is confidential, meaning if it’s revealed, it could cause some hard to national security. General Patreaus was indicted, prosecuted, and convicted for having confidential, the lowest level materials in a desk drawer in his house. Mrs. Clinton, it has now been revealed, had top secret materials in the server in her barn at Chappaqua. [Fox News, Fox & Friends, 8/12/15]
            FACT: Experts Have Debunked The Comparison — Petraeus Knowingly Mishandled Classified Documents, Whereas Clinton Had Authorization To Use Private Email, And There’s No Evidence She Knowingly Emailed Classified Information
            Petraeus Pled Guilty To Violating 18 U.S.C. § 1924, “Unlawfully And Knowingly” Moving Classified Materials “With Intent To Retain Such Documents … At Unauthorized Locations.” Petraeus pled guilty to one count of violating Title 18, United States Code, Section 1924:
            Between in or about August 2011 and on or about April 5, 2013, defendant DAVID HOWELL PETRAEUS, being an employee of the United States, and by virtue of his employment, became possessed of documents and materials containing classified information of the United States, and did unlawfully and knowingly remove such documents and materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents and materials at unauthorized locations, aware that these locations were unauthorized for the storage and retention of such classified documents and materials;
            All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1924. [U.S. v. Petraeus, Bill of Information, 3/3/15]
            NY Times: “There Has Never Been Any Legal Prohibition Against” Using Personal Email Accounts. Despite having previously scandalized Clinton’s use of private emails as “alarming,” the Times later clarified that “there has never been any legal prohibition” against the practice and that “[m]embers of President Obama’s cabinet” use a “wide variety of strategies” to handle their emails:
            Members of President Obama’s cabinet have a wide variety of strategies, shortcuts and tricks for handling their email, and until three months ago there was no law setting out precisely what they had to do with it, and when. And while the majority of Obama administration officials use government email to conduct their business, there has never been any legal prohibition against using a personal account. [The New York Times, 3/13/15]
            State Dept: Clinton Preserved And Provided Emails In Line With 2009 Regulation And How We Handled Records At The Time. At the March 3 daily press briefing, State Department deputy spokesperson Marie Harf explained that Clinton turned over 55,000 pages of documents as part of the State Department’s “process of updating our records management” and emphasized that Clinton is the only former secretary of state to have done so. From Harf’s briefing:
            HARF: When in the process of updating our records management – this is something that’s sort of ongoing given technology and the changes – we reached out to all of the former secretaries of state to ask them to provide any records they had. Secretary Clinton sent back 55,000 pages of documents to the State Department very shortly after we sent the letter to her. She was the only former Secretary of State who sent documents back in to this request. These 55,000 pages covered her time, the breadth of her time at the State Department. [State Department Daily Press Briefing,3/3/15]
            Clinton: “I Am Confident That I Never Sent Or Received Any Information That Was Classified At The Time.” Clinton told reporters on July 26 that she never sent or received information that she knew was classified at the time:
            Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said she never knowingly sent or received classified information using her private email server and did not know what messages were being cited by intelligence investigators as examples of emails containing classified information.
            “I am confident that I never sent or received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received. What I think you’re seeing here is a very typical kind of discussion, to some extent disagreement among various parts of the government, over what should or should not be publicly released,” she said. [Associated Press, 7/26/15]
            Director Of Project On Government Secrecy: “There’s No Comparison Between The Clinton Email Issue And The Petraeus Case.” Steven Aftergood told The Washington Times that “[e]veryone agrees that there was no information in the Clinton emails that was marked as classified,” and therefore Clinton’s actions bear no resemblance to Petraeus’s:
            While officials combing tens of thousands of emails that moved through Mrs. Clinton’s server have pointed to the presence of “hundreds” of pieces of classified information — apparently none of the messages had any official classification markings on them.
            It’s a situation that has triggered heated debate over the extent to which such information wasn’t necessarily classified at the time Mrs. Clinton was emailing it.
            “To the best of my understanding, there is no comparison between the Clinton email issue and the Petraeus case,” says Steven Aftergood, who heads the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists. “Everyone agrees that there was no information in the Clinton emails that was marked as classified. So it would be difficult or impossible to show that those who sent or received the emails knowingly or negligently mishandled classified information.” [The Washington Times, 8/2/15]
            Government Secrecy Expert: “There’s No Case” Against Clinton If She Didn’t Knowingly Misuse Classified Information. William Jeffress, an attorney who has handled government secrecy cases, told Time:
            Legally, the question is pretty clear-cut. If Clinton knowingly used her private server to handle classified information she could have a problem. But if she didn’t know the material was classified when she sent or received it she’s safe.
            Clinton has explicitly and repeatedly said she didn’t knowingly send or receive any classified information. “The facts are pretty clear,” she said last weekend in Iowa, “I did not send nor receive anything that was classified at the time.” Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III, disagrees, saying some of the material was in fact classified at the time it was sent. But in his letter last week to Congressional intelligence committee leaders, McCullough reported that, “None of the emails we reviewed had classification or dissemination markings.” And there has been no indication Clinton knew she was sending and receiving anything classified.
            The public doesn’t yet know the content of the classified emails, and the State Department and the inspectors general have tens of thousands still to review. If evidence emerges that Clinton knew she was handling secrets on her private server, “She could have a problem,” says William Jeffress, a leading criminal trial lawyer at Baker Botts who has represented government officials in secrecy cases. Barring that, says Jeffress, “there’s no way in the world [prosecutors] could ever make a case” against her. [Time, 7/29/15]
            MYTH: Clinton Is The Subject Of A Federal Criminal Investigation
            Fox’s Chris Stirewalt: Clinton Might Be “The Subject Of A Federal Criminal Investigation.” On the August 12 edition of Fox News’ America’s Newsroom, digital editor Chris Stirewalt claimed that Clinton might become “the first major party nominee that is the subject of a federal criminal investigation.” [Fox News, America’s Newsroom, 8/12/15]
            FACT: IG Referral To Justice Department Was Not Criminal, And FBI Isn’t Targeting Clinton Herself
            Reuters: Inspector General Referral Is Not Criminal. Reuters reported on July 24 that there was “no criminal referral over [the] Clinton emails”:
            The Justice Department said Friday it has received a request to examine the handling of classified information related to the private emails from Hillary Clinton during her time as secretary of state, but it is not a criminal referral. [Reuters, 7/24/15]
            AP: U.S. Official Said That Request Of DOJ “Doesn’t Suggest Wrongdoing By Clinton Herself.” The Associated Press quoted an anonymous U.S. official who noted that the referral did not implicate Clinton in any wrongdoing:
            The New York Times first reported the referral. The Clinton campaign said Friday that she “followed appropriate practices in dealing with classified materials.” Spokesman Nick Merrill said emails deemed classified by the administration were done so after the fact, not when they were sent.
            One U.S. official said it was unclear whether classified information was mishandled and the referral doesn’t suggest wrongdoing by Clinton herself. [Associated Press, 7/24/15]
            Wash. Post: Officials Say Clinton “Is Not A Target” Of FBI Probe. The Washington Post reported that government officials said Clinton is “not a target” of the FBI’s investigation:
            Hillary Rodham Clinton’s attorney has agreed to provide the FBI with the private server that housed her e-mail during her four years as secretary of state, Clinton’s presidential campaign said Tuesday.
            The inquiry by the FBI is considered preliminary and appears to be focused on ensuring the proper handling of classified material. Officials have said that Clinton, the Democratic presidential front-runner, is not a target.
            The FBI’s efforts have included contacting the Denver-based technology firm that helped manage the Clintons’ unusual private ­e-mail system. [The Washington Post,

    • That’s what I don’t understand myself, Patriot1001. Even the liberals, who I don’t feel are as intelligent as they would like to THINK THEY ARE, should be able to see just what kind of person they are pushing to get into the highest office in the country. Is this who ANYONE wants as our president, making the MOST IMPORTANT DECISIONS of anyone in this country? Her decisions would have in many cases WORLDLY implications. With ALL the scandals she and Bill have had throughout their ENTIRE time in politics, is this REALLY someone you want that could possibly have her finger on the red button?

      • Not trying to be needlessly nasty here BUT… you seem to be extremely willing to overlook the manner of ANTI American garbage they ALREADY put in office… not once BUT TWICE! With HIM in office you have too wonder just WHAT cities our atomic weapons target NOW?

      • Allergic to reading are you or just incapable of reading comp? The email investigation laid a trail of bread crumbs to the “Clinton Foundation” AND IT IS ALSO being investigated… per the FBI.

        • FACT: There Is No Evidence That Clinton Personally Signed Off On A Cable Reducing Security In Benghazi

          FACT: The State Department Did Not Watch The Benghazi Attacks Unfold In Real Time

          FACT: Hillary Clinton Was Not Unaccounted For During The Attacks, She Was In Continuous Contact With Administration Officials

          FACT: Contrary To Conservative Conspiracies, Clinton Missed A Scheduled Benghazi Hearing After Being Injured

          FACT: Clinton’s “What Difference, At This Point, Does It Make” Comment Was Referring To The Administration’s Post-Attack Talking Points, Not Tragic Consequences Of Attack

          FACT: Intelligence Community, The Suspected Attackers, And Eyewitnesses All Linked The Inflammatory Anti-Islam Video To The Attacks

          FACT: There Is No Proof Clinton’s State Department Scrubbed, Altered, Or Covered Up Any Benghazi Documents

          FACT: Benghazi Witnesses Spoke To Federal Officials And Congress, And Were Not Blocked From Coming Forward By Clinton

          FACT: Contrary To Consevative Media Smears, Clinton Said She Took Responsibility For The Benghazi Attack

          FACT: While Conservatives Claimed She Was Silent, Clinton Spoke Extensively About Benghazi Following Attack

          FACT: Clinton’s Use Of A Personal Email Account Was Legal And Did Not Violate State Department Policy

          FACT: Clinton Is Not The Subject Of A Criminal Investigation Over Her Emails

          FACT: Clinton Did Not Receive Any Emails Labeled As “Classified” Or “Top Secret” At The Time They Were Sent

          FACT:Clinton’s Use Of A Private Server Did Not Raise Additional Questions About The Retroactive Classification Of Her Emails

          FACT: Conservative Comparisons Of Clinton To Petraeus Ignore The Fact That Unlike Petraeus, There’s No Evidence Clinton Knowingly Emailed Classified Information

          FACT: CIA Says Clinton Did Not Expose Classified Information About Libyan Intelligence Source With Email Contrary To Conservative Claims

          MYTH: Clinton Personally Signed-Off On Order To Reduce Security At U.S. Diplomatic Facilities In Benghazi

          • FACT #1: I’M NOT TALKING ABOUT BENGHAZI!
            FACT #2: NEITHER ARE THE FBI OR THE TWO DEMOCRAT INTEL IG’S WHO SAY HER MICKEY MOUSE SERVER WAS A VIOLATION OF THE AGREEMENT SHE SGNED TO KEEP INTEL SECURE BEFORE IT WAS SENT TO HER AS SOS!
            FACT #3: YOUR INTENTIONAL, WILFUL BLINDNESS CHANGES NOTHING ABOUT FACTS 1 AND 2!

          • … FACT: Clinton Did Not Receive Any Emails Labeled As “Classified” Or … At this point, Issa has no basis or evidence to show that Clinton had ….. … FACT: IG Referral To Justice Department Was Not Criminal, And FBI Isn’t Targeting Clinton.

          • edwin; you wrote:

            “FACT: Clinton Did Not Receive Any Emails Labeled As ‘Classified’.”

            edwin: I’ve already kicked your ass over this obfuscating prevarication, so put it away: re-posting it time and Time and TIME AGAIN only makes you look stupid (more stupid?).

          • Of course, we all know who also advocated posting false and misleading propaganda over and over again; don’t we, Herr Edwin?

            “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
            ~Joseph Goebbels, Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda (Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda) for the Nazi Party (1933-1945)

            However, no one in this blog believes a single word you’ve posted.

            So, edwin: all you’re doing here in pissing into the wind and it’s making you smell even more like piss.

          • FACT: Are you posting from a mental institution???? It sounds to me that you have lost it altogether and need some serious help.

    • .The right wing nut cases don’t deal in facts just unsubstantiated conspiracy theories.. FACT: Clinton Did Not Receive Any Emails Labeled As “Classified” Or … At this point, Issa has no basis or evidence to show that Clinton had ….. MYTH: Clinton Never Took “Any Kind Of Responsibility” For Attacks …. FACT: IG Referral To Justice Department Was Not Criminal, And FBI Isn’t Targeting Clinton.

      • edwin wrote:

        “FACT: Clinton Did Not Receive Any Emails Labeled As ‘Classified’.”

        FALSE – and already proven to be false.

        Moreover, anyone in the government who is authorized to deal with classified materials is trained to recognize classified materials and handle them accordingly.

        So, edwin: is Hillary intentionally lying or merely incompetent? Those are the only two choices here.

        • It is not false, just do your research. The problem is you all read to much right wing conspiracy bullsh-t neither of the choices you offer are valid and you should know it.

          • edwin; you wrote:

            “FACT: Clinton Did Not Receive Any Emails Labeled As ‘Classified’.”

            I responded:

            “FALSE – and already proven to be false.”

            You countered:

            “It is not false, just do your research.”

            Time to point out both your and Hillary’s obfuscating prevarication (aka Misleading Lying):

            For quite a few years I worked in the “Military/Industrial Complex” and often handled “classified” documents.

            There is no such “classification” as “Classified” – ergo: there are ZERO documents marked “Classified”: documents of a security nature are, theoretically, supposedly marked “CONFIDENTIAL,” “SECRET” or “TOP SECRET” (and there hasn’t been a classification of “RESTRICTED” for over 60 years).

            There is also a “superset” of “Top Secret” – to-wit: “Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information” (TS/SCI) and “Top Secret/Special Access Program” (TS/SAP). Access to these documents requires more than a mere “background check” – they must undergo a ‘proctological’ (i.e.: ‘crawl up your aśś with a microscope’) “Single Scope Background Investigation” (SSBI).

            Topping all that, a person merely having authority to access “classified” documents does not automatically have permission: they must also have a “need to know.”

            Nevertheless, according to the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) any and all official intra- and inter-agency documents into and out of the Department of State are to be considered “classified” – marked or not – and handled as such.

            So, edwin; I repeat: “Is Hillary intentionally lying or merely incompetent? Those are the only two choices here.”

          • classified emails are not sent or received on unclassified servers. classified emails have a special marking attached.
            According to a statement by the State Department, “These documents were not marked classified at the time they were sent.”
            In other words, they do not contain information that was “born classified,” but rather fall into the vast gray area of things that do not seem obviously secret at the time but are later deemed that way — not always for good reason.
            This might all just be a product of America’s problem with over classification
            The American government’s system for classifying things as secret is widely considered a giant mess, by which agencies reflexively overclassify things, and the reasons for classifying often make little sense. It is thus extremely easy to imagine that Clinton’s emails were classified not because they contained super-sensitive national secrets, and possibly not for any good reason at all, but rather just as a product of America’s broken classification system.
            This goes back to 1982, when the Reagan administration began a program of such aggressive classification that the unofficial slogan was, “When in doubt, classify.” This waned under Bill Clinton but shot back up dramatically under George W. Bush, so much so that by 2004 the mere bureaucracy for classifying documents cost $7 billion per year.
            Even John Bolton, a senior Bush official who often championed executive secrecy, once complained, “If there is anyone who fully understands our ‘system’ for protecting classified information, I have yet to meet him.”
            The problem was not so much secrecy itself as bureaucratic disarray; something that contains no obviously sensitive information might nonetheless be reflexively classified, or might be classified because the information at some point passed through someone or something that also handles classified information. Or maybe the information is banal but it was later wrapped into a report or document that is itself classified for different reasons.
            The problem, in other words, isn’t that the rules for classification are too strict. It’s that the rules are unclear, messy, or contradictory, to the degree that the rules exist at all, and individual people and agencies have learned to overclassify to stay on the safe side.
            The problem has grown so severe that it has hampered even the ability of American intelligence officials and policymakers to access the information they need to do their jobs. The head of the 9/11 Commission, Richard Ben-Veniste, told Congress in 2005 that “the failure to share information was the single most important reason why the United States government failed to detect and disrupt the 9/11 plot.” He warned, “Information has to flow more freely. Much more information needs to be declassified. A great deal of information should never be classified at all.”
            In 2010, as a result, Congress passed the Reducing Over-Classification Act, which ordered federal agencies to do exactly that.
            But no one thinks that overclassification has been fixed. Federal agencies still have a habit of heavily classifying things, regardless of whether they need to be.
            As an example of how silly this can get, State Department employees are banned from reading WikiLeaks cables or articles that quote them, as the cables include classified information. So the people responsible for guiding American foreign policy are barred from reading foreign policy coverage that you and I may access freely. Virtually no one in the State Department likes this policy, by the way, but it is a product of the government’s larger, and largely broken, system of assigning and dealing with classifications.

          • Yada Yada Yada 😉

            From that ‘Right-Wing Conspiracy’ source, National Public Radio (NPR), comes:

            Over 1,000 Clinton Documents Released, Including 84 New Classified Emails
            February 13, 20168:11 PM ET
            by Jessica Taylor
            […]
            Last month, the State Department announced that seven emails chains — 22 documents representing 37 pages — will not be released, because they had been upgraded to top secret, the highest form of classified material.
            […]
            Clinton has maintained she never sent material which was classified on the private server at the time.
            […]
            http://www.npr.org/2016/02/13/466686230/over-1-000-clinton-documents-released-including-84-new-classified-emails

            One must note the ‘weasel-worded’ statement “Clinton has maintained she never sent material which was classified on the private server at the time.”

            First: as I noted in the past, part of the vetting procedure to receive a Security Clearance required to send and RECEIVE security-sensitive documents is that the person MUST sign a statement that he/she is capable of recognizing documents that, by their very nature, MUST be treated as security-sensitive and handle them accordingly.

            Second: where is your stating her denial that she never RECEIVED security-sensitive documents (and don’t fall back on that “FACT: Clinton Did Not Receive Any Emails Labeled As ‘Classified’” dodge, as I already ‘clued you in’ to the ‘FACT’ there is no such ‘Label’ as ‘Classified’!).

            Here’s what she ACTUALLY said, edwin:

            “I have said repeatedly that I did not send nor receive classified material, and I’m very confident that when this entire process plays out that will be understood by everyone.”
            –Hillary Clinton, in her speech to a gathering of the Democrat Party’s most committed activists at the Democratic National Committee summer meetings Friday, Aug 28, 2015

            And:

            “I can only repeat what happens to be the case — that I did not send nor receive information that was marked classified at the time that it was sent or received.”
            –Hillary Clinton, during an interview with ABC News’ David Muir on Tuesday, September 8, 2015

            Her CLAIM does not make it a FACT!

            Your constantly claiming that it’s a “FACT: Clinton Did Not Receive Any Emails Labeled As ‘Classified’” is FALSE on its face.

            Now, edwin; IF you want to “advise and extend your remarks” to state that it’s a “FACT” that she is CLAIMING she did not “receive emails that were ‘marked’ indicating that they contained classified material at the time she received them”, you will FINALLY be stating something that IS true.

            Do you possess that much honesty, edwin?

            Show us what you’re made of – admit that you have been posting Left-Wing-Slanted Propaganda here.

            Meanwhile:

            “This court-ordered release is another reminder that Hillary Clinton’s attempt to skirt transparency laws put our national security at risk and that she failed to meet her legal obligations to protect classified information as Secretary of State. With Clinton now tied to three federal investigations by the State Department and FBI, buyer’s remorse must be growing amongst the Democrat establishment who have gone out of their way to rig the nominating process in her favor. As the results in Iowa and New Hampshire have shown, even Democrats find Clinton’s dishonesty and untrustworthiness unacceptable.”
            –Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus

          • Right Clinton said she never sent or received any emails marked classified. … markings are required for all documents that contain originally classified information. … Identify the classification level of each portion contained in the document …. If a document contains more than one page, the banner marking will be …… document or any enclosure, include them on the banner line. Its impossible to send information from a secured server to an unsecured server. the system will not allow that to happen. After the fact, does not constitute wrong doing. In a court of law one of the criteria is intent. You right wingers ,Tea Baggers or what ever you call yourselves don’t give a damn about the emails , you just think oh this will be a good way to bring Clinton down. You don’t have any ideas of your own so we will just crush are opposition with false statesmen’s, innuendo’s and lies.What I have read on the blog and other right wing blogs, you are one sorry a-s bunch;.

          • “After the fact, does not constitute wrong doing. In a court of law one of the criteria is intent.”

            She intended to use a private email server not within the confines of a federal building which, therefore, could not be monitored by the Network Security officials of the U.S. Department of State. That was and is illegal, edwin.

            And her intention to do such is known as ‘mens rea’, edwin.

            You seem to forget that, unlike her minions such as you, she is (was?) a lawyer and as such has no excuse for not knowing and, moreover, following the federal law regarding security of communications.

            Try as you might, you are never going to get anyone in this blog to believe that she’s not playing semantics word games here in an ill-advised, and ill-fated, attempt to CHA (cover her ass).

          • You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make the dumbass drink. Same applies with you and your fellow bloggers.

          • “When your opponent in a discussions resorts to profanity he’s admitting he’s lost the debate.”

            Quod erat demonstrandum

          • I haven’t lost anything just got tired of all the lying bullsh_t. Quod erat demostrandum, I have claimed that position , not you. you and your right wing sources have no creditability.

          • “I haven’t lost anything just got tired of all the lying bullsh_t.”

            The only “lying bullsh_t” I’ve seen here is being posted by a person posting under the User ID of ‘edwin.’

          • That’s your problem, you can’t see. You are blind to the truth. Truth in your world comes from a right wing rag.

          • “That’s your problem, you can’t see. You are blind to the truth. Truth in your world comes from a right wing rag.”

            ROTFL!!! ;-D

            Calling CBS News “a right wing rag” has to be the stupidest thing you’ve posted to date!

            Gotta wonder just HOW you’re going to top that stupid statement. 🙂

            “(Hillary) Clinton isn’t just a bad candidate — she’s a threat to the future of the Democratic party itself — she is the second coming of Reagan, a corrosive force that will destroy the foundation’s of American progressivism.”
            –Walter Bragman, millennial progressive, Salon Magazine

            [Wonder if edwin here’s gonna label Salon as “a right wing rag”, too? 😉 ]

          • Walter Bragman is a Sanders supporter who writes a column for Salon.
            CBS contributed to the article you referred to. NPR article was just reporting what the Republican party and Preibus were saying. So you are still full of it.

          • If anybody is a Nazi propagandist it you and the right wing crap you put out. Nazis were right wing nut cases just like your right wing friends.

          • Walter Bragman is a Sanders supporter and writes a column that appears in Salon. The CBS article you refer to the reporter was only a contributor to the article and NPR was reporting comments made by the republicans in no case was the news outlets you refer to were endorsing the comments. Classified information is not allowed outside government computer servers. The government has said that Mrs. Clinton is not a subject of the investigation.

          • “The government has said that Mrs. Clinton is not a subject of the investigation.”

            Why the Justice Department Won’t Work with the FBI on Clinton’s E-mail Case
            by Andrew C. McCarthy January 23, 2016 4:00 AM
            @AndrewCMcCarthy

            Another day, another double-take reading the New York Times.

            The latest shoe in the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s scandalous mishandling of classified information dropped heavily this week. It had already been reported that, contrary to her denials, hundreds of secret intelligence communications were transmitted over the private, unsecured e-mail system on which the former secretary of state recklessly conducted government business. It is now clear that some of these contained “top secret/SAP” information. (SAP is “special access programs.”) This indicates defense secrets of the highest order, the compromise of which can destroy vital intelligence programs, get covert agents killed, and imperil national security.

            Yet, in reporting the story, the Times’ Mark Mazzetti took pains to stress: “The government has said that Mrs. Clinton is not a subject of the investigation.”

            Really? Well, to put it in Clintonian terms: It all depends on what the definition of “subject” is.

            Though you wouldn’t know it from the Times, “subject” is a term of art in criminal investigations. It refers to one of the three categories into which prosecutors fit every relevant actor. Subjects are people whose conduct is being scrutinized and who, depending on what evidence turns up, may or may not be charged. This distinguishes them from targets, who are suspects virtually certain to be indicted for an obvious crime; and from mere witnesses, whose interaction with a suspect suggests no criminality on their part (e.g., the teller in a bank hold-up, or the neighbor awakened by a fatal gunshot next door).

            For law enforcement, targets and mere witnesses are easy to deal with. Targets usually decline to be interviewed (as is their right under the Fifth Amendment). Even if they are not guilty, it is often prudent for them to wait to see what the government alleges before they answer questions. Witnesses tend to speak freely because there is no reason not to.
            “Subject” is the ambiguous category. A subject has engaged in conduct that appears criminal but may have an innocent explanation. Cooperating makes sense if the subject’s account is likely to convince the government not to file charges. If not, cooperation is fraught with risk, and a competent lawyer will probably advise against it.

            If someone’s conduct is being investigated for potential wrongdoing, it is safe to assume that person is a subject of that investigation. Thus understood, Mrs. Clinton is not only a subject; she is the main subject. After all, the investigation centers on her mishandling of classified information via a private e-mail system that she improperly set up for all her government business and over which she well knew it was illegal to disseminate classified information. And if recent reporting is accurate, the investigation is now delving into potential corruption: the favorable treatment donors to her private foundation were given by the State Department she was running. Given that the investigation appears to be tracking her unique activities, how could she possibly not be a subject? What would otherwise be the point of investigating?

            Yet the Times’ report does not just deny that Mrs. Clinton is a subject. Echoing the Clinton presidential campaign, it claims that the government itself says she is not a subject.

            How is that possible? Perhaps a bit more background on how investigations work will pierce the Clintonian fog.

            First, there is one other thing you should know about the designations “target” and “subject” — one of those things so obvious it is easy to miss. These are not just random words. They indicate that a suspect is a target or a subject of something.

            That something is a grand-jury investigation.

            In an ordinary case, that would not be a point worth making. The FBI routinely conducts major investigations in collaboration with Justice Department prosecutors — usually from the U.S. attorney’s office in the district where potential crimes occurred. That is because the FBI needs the assistance of a grand jury. The FBI does not have authority even to issue subpoenas, let alone to charge someone with a crime. Only federal prosecutors may issue subpoenas, on the lawful authority of the grand jury. Only prosecutors are empowered to present evidence or propose charges to the grand jury. And the Constitution vests only the grand jury with authority to indict — the formal accusation of a crime. In our system, the FBI can do none of these things.

            No Justice Department, no grand jury. No grand jury, no case — period. As a technical matter, no matter how extensively the FBI pokes around on its own, no one can be a subject of a real investigation — i.e., one that can lead to criminal charges — unless and until there is a grand jury. That does not happen until the Justice Department hops on board.

            Regular criminal-justice procedures have been suspended by the explosive politics of the Clinton investigation. Alas, regular criminal-justice procedures have been suspended by the explosive politics of the Clinton investigation. The FBI is doing its professional, apolitical best to investigate the presumptive Democratic nominee for president of the United States. The high stakes rattle not only the Clinton campaign but also the Democratic administration in which Mrs. Clinton worked when she engaged in the work-related conduct being investigated. On the one hand, the Obama administration does not want to be seen by the public as obstructing the FBI; on the other hand, President Obama does not want to be seen by his base as tanking the Democrats’ best shot at retaining the White House — the likely fallout if the Obama Justice Department signals that a formal, very serious criminal investigation is underway.

            So Obama is hedging his bets. He is letting the FBI investigate, but on its own, without Justice Department prosecutors and the grand jury. This frees the administration and the Clinton campaign to be, by turns, ambiguous and disingenuous about whether there really is a formal investigation going on. As long as it is only the FBI doing the digging, everyone can play along with the farce: The investigation is very “preliminary,” it doesn’t even have “subjects,” and it may even be a Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy sabotage (in which, somehow, the saboteurs are Obama appointees and non-political law-enforcement agents).

            I don’t think it’s going to work.

            The FBI may not have a Justice Department prosecutor convening a grand jury, but it so happens that Director James Comey (whom I have known since we were pup prosecutors under Rudy Giuliani nearly 30 years ago) is a more accomplished government lawyer than anyone at the Justice Department. In fact, his own decorated DOJ career includes a term as deputy attorney general of the United States under President George W. Bush. Besides working under administrations of both parties, he has overseen prosecutions of both Republicans and Democrats. I’ve known no one in law enforcement more capable of navigating through a political maelstrom. Jim is tough, he is smart, and if there is a case to be made here, he will make it. And if he makes it, it will be bulletproof.

            Of course, making the case would not mean the FBI could force attorney general Loretta Lynch — and the president to whom she answers — to pursue the case. The FBI cannot convene a grand jury and present an indictment. But you’d best believe the FBI can make the Obama administration look very bad if it shrinks from doing so. Then it will be a matter of how far Barack Obama is willing to stick his neck out for Hillary Clinton.

            I’m betting: not that far.

            — Andrew C. McCarthy is as senior policy fellow at the National Review Institute and a contributing editor of National Review.

            http://www.nationalreview.com/article/430211/hillary-clinton-email-fbi-department-justice-obama

            Oh; I know: NR is yet another of those pesky “right wing rags”; right, edwin?

          • “classified emails are not sent or received on unclassified servers. classified emails have a special marking attached. According to a statement by the State Department, ‘These documents were not marked classified at the time they were sent.’
            In other words, they do not contain information that was ‘born classified,’ but rather fall into the vast gray area of things that do not seem obviously secret at the time but are later deemed that way — not always for good reason.”

            You make kicking your ass just so easy, edwin:

            State Department routinely sent secrets over email
            CBS News | AP August 26, 2015, 3:41 PM

            WASHINGTON — The transmission of now-classified information across Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private email is consistent with a State Department culture in which diplomats routinely sent secret material on unsecured email during the past two administrations, according to documents reviewed by The Associated Press.

            Hillary Clinton remains surrounded by email controversy
            http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/hillary-clinton-remains-surrounded-by-email-controversy

            Clinton’s use of a home server makes her case unique and has become an issue in her front-running campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination. But it’s not clear whether the security breach would have been any less had she used department email. The department only systematically checks email for sensitive or classified material in response to a public records request.

            In emails about the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya, department officials discuss sensitive matters in real time, including the movement of Libyan militias and the locations of key Americans. The messages were released last year under the Freedom of Information Act and are posted on the State Department’s website.

            An email from diplomat Alyce Abdalla, sent the night of the attack, appears to report that the CIA annex in Benghazi was under fire. The email has been largely whited out, with the government citing the legal exemption for classified intelligence information. The existence of that facility is now known; it was a secret at the time.

            In an email sent at 8:51 p.m. on Sept. 11, 2012, Eric J. Pelofsky, a senior adviser to then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, gives an update on efforts to locate U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, who died in the attack.

            The email was marked unclassified when sent. Later, part of it was deemed classified and censored before its release.

            In five emails that date to Condoleezza Rice’s tenure as secretary of state during the George W. Bush administration, large chunks are censored on the grounds that they contain classified national security or foreign government information.

            These emails also are posted on the State Department website’s reading room.

            In a December 2006 email, diplomat John J. Hillmeyer appears to have pasted the text of a confidential cable from Beijing about China’s dealings with Iran and other sensitive matters. Large portions of the email were marked classified and censored before release.

            Clinton insists she didn’t send or receive classified information. But government officials have found material they deem classified in 30,000 emails that the former secretary of state has turned over, an unfolding saga that has dogged her 2016 campaign.

            Many of the emails to Clinton containing classified information were forwarded to her by a close aide, Huma Abedin. Most, however, originated with diplomats who have access to confidential material. Some emails sent by Clinton have since been censored.

            Another bad week for Clinton: Democratic pool heats up
            http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/another-bad-week-for-clinton-democratic-pool-heats-up

            Such slippage of classified information into regular email is “very common, actually,” said Leslie McAdoo, a lawyer who frequently represents government officials and contractors in disputes over security clearances and classified information.

            What makes Clinton’s case different is that she exclusively sent and received emails through a home server in lieu of the State Department’s unclassified email system. Neither would have been secure from hackers or foreign intelligence agencies, so it would be equally problematic whether classified information was carried over the government system or a private server, experts say.

            In fact, the State Department’s unclassified email system has been penetrated by hackers believed linked to Russian intelligence.

            Many of the emails to Clinton came from state.gov email accounts, noted Steven Aftergood, an expert on classification at the Federation of American Scientists. “So if there is routine security screening and monitoring of incoming and outgoing State Department emails, anything that is classified should have been flagged. That does not seem to have happened. I think it’s the State Department culture.”

            That may be true, but it would not save a rank-and-file official with a security clearance who was caught sending classified information over email, said Bradley Moss, a lawyer who frequently represents intelligence officers. That person could lose his job, his clearance, or both.

            “In real life, the `everybody does it defense’ doesn’t fly,” Moss said.

            Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said State Department officials were permitted at the time to use personal email accounts for official business, and that the department was aware of Clinton’s private server.

            The AP has asked the State Department to turn over records reflecting any concerns by agency computer staff or security officials over Clinton’s use of a private email server, but has received no responsive documents.

            There is no indication that any information in Clinton emails was marked classified at the time it was sent. But critics have said Clinton and her aides should have known not to discuss anything remotely secret over unsecured email. The emails show they were cognizant of security, routinely communicating over secure phone and fax lines.

            Clinton also had access to a classified messaging system, but it’s not widely used at the State Department. Most department officials in Washington and at embassies have on their desktops a classified network that goes up to “secret” level. A small number of State officials, including the secretary, can use a third system that goes up to “top secret” level in special secure rooms.

            But even the middle-tier “secret” network is cumbersome for many in the agency, said officials who would not be quoted when discussing internal security policies. Only a few top officials in Washington are able to read classified emails outside the department’s headquarters. Most ambassadors can’t open their accounts from home. Officials in the field may have no access at all.

            Lots of State Department information is meant for use, sharing and interaction with foreign officials, the vast majority of whom aren’t authorized to receive classified U.S. material.

            AP

            http://www.cbsnews.com/news/state-department-routinely-sent-secrets-over-email/

            Read it, Comprehend it. Own it!

          • It was in part from a cbs contributor, If it wasn’t classified when sent it wasn’t classified. only later after investigated someone decided to mark it classified just to be safe. The government does this all the time. One person will determine its not classified and other will classify just to cover their a_s. a classified message from a classified server will not let it send to a unclassified server. Plain and simple, anyone receiving a message that is later determine to be classified wouldn’t be guilty of receiving classified material is it wasn.t classified at the time, period. beat your brains out trying to convince your self. Oh, you have to have a brain first.

          • “It was in part from a cbs contributor”

            CBS News chose to pull the article off the Associated Press wire for publication – as did numerous other news reporting agencies. The article itself was researched and written by AP reporter Brad Klapper (@bklapperAP). You will also find his stories on the Public Broadcasting Service’s TV system and NPR stations.

            Are AP and PBS yet more “right wing rag” news sources, edwin?

            “If it wasn’t classified when sent it wasn’t classified. only later after investigated someone decided to mark it classified just to be safe.”

            What you so conveniently choose to ignore is that unless the document is marked UNCLASSIFIED (U) it is to be treated and handled as if it was marked CONFIDENTIAL (C), SECRET (S) or TOP SECRET (TS) per the User Agreement Hillary Clinton executed with the State Department’s Office of Information Security when she took the office of Secretary of State.

            More importantly, Hillary violated no less that three federal statutes when she intentionally and knowingly chose to use her own private email network in place of the Department of State’s networks:

            18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) and Executive Order 13526: “Mishandling Classified Information”

            36 C.F.R., Part 1236, § 1236.22 National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Rules and Regulations: “What are the additional requirements for managing electronic mail records?”

            and:

            5 U.S.C. § 552, Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA)

            “Plain and simple, anyone receiving a message that is later determine to be classified wouldn’t be guilty of receiving classified material is it wasn.t {SIC} classified at the time, period.”

            You just keep on telling yourself that, edwin. Maybe the federal grand jury will agree with you.

            Nevertheless, Hillary’s use of her private email system is in and of itself a federal crime.

            And since she did such intentionally and knowingly with the intention to avoid the NARA and FIOA statutes’ document storage and access requirements, that is known in legal circles as ‘mens rea’ (guilty mind).

            “beat your brains out trying to convince your self {SIC}. Oh, you have to have a brain first.”

            Sticks and stones, edwin – sticks and stones …..

            At least my brain isn’t contaminated by left-wing LibSoc SJW propaganda – like you have well-demonstrated yours to be.

          • The outlets you mentioned report news from others not necessary endorse them. Walter Bragman is a Sanders supporter who writes a column that appears in Salon. What I said was classified email sent from a classified sever will not connect to an unclassified sever. You don’t know what the hell you are talking about you just don’t like Clinton and have to lie like hell to justify your position. Go peddle your stupid shit to some one who might believe your crap.

          • classified information is not allowed outside government computer servers. The government has said that Mrs. Clinton is not a subject of the investigation.

    • … FACT: Clinton Did Not Receive Any Emails Labeled As “Classified” Or … At this point, Issa has no basis or evidence to show that Clinton had ….. MYTH: Clinton Never Took “Any Kind Of Responsibility” For Attacks …. FACT: IG Referral To Justice Department Was Not Criminal, And FBI Isn’t Targeting Clinton.

    • The FBI does not indict. They submit a recommendation based on their investigation to the Attorney General who then decides whether to indict. While I hope I’m wrong, I will be surprised if Loretta Lynch will indict Clinton no matter what crimes she committed.

        • Indicted is just the start. It takes quite a while to be scheduled for trial, then the trial take a long time to select jurors, then scheduling for trial dates, then months of trial. Even after being found guilty, sentencing has to be scheduled. Good prosecutors can drag the case on well past the start of the next presidential term. Now is a good time to start or maybe wait to see if she is going to be the Dems candidate, then begin the indictment!

          • The Constitution gives the President authority to pardon long before a trial or conviction. Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution gives the president unlimited powers to pardon except for impeachment. A pardon can even be issued at the time of the offense is committed and can be issued after the full sentence has been served. Obama can issue a pardon at anytime after a recommendation of indictment is provided by the FBI to the DOJ. I believe Obama would expeditiously grant a pardon because Hildabeast knows about too many skeletons in his closet.

    • NO the FBI IS NOT “dragging their feet” THE STATE DEPT IS! They are WAY behind the schedule the judge set for them to turn ALL of the emails over TOO the FBI who CAN NOT examine WHAT THEY DON’T HAVE YET!

      • “They are WAY behind the schedule the judge set for them to turn ALL of the emails over TOO {SIC} the FBI who CAN NOT examine WHAT THEY DON’T HAVE YET!”

        Speaking of “the judge”:

        Judge pushes State Dept, FBI to expand probe on Clinton email server
        http://www.cbsnews.com/news/federal-judge-push-state-fbi-expand-probe-clinton-email-server/

        Wonder of edwin is going to claim CBS News as being one of those “right-wing” organizations “out to get Hillary”? 😉

        • Of course he will. There is NO way too FORCE someone to see truth they REFUSE to see. And that’s just what he, like many others DO! It’s like talking too a KKK member or a black BLM bigot, you CANNOT communicate with WILLFUL stupidity!

  3. Buyer Beware, as a lifetime Clinton observer this may be an old Clinton Trick. Break a small rule as a smoke screen to camouflage the REAL deal…breaking a Big rule or Law as is often the case with The Clinton Crime Cartel.

  4. No, Illinois has the most corrupt government in the country, which has been exported to the national level courtesy of Obama’s Chicago way of lawlessness. Hillary will not be chucked off the ballot, but Bernie may be.

  5. Hitlary, has a long history of, KNOWING, she is above the law. If anyone of us were to have broken the law(s), that she has, we would be wearing Orange!

  6. if “clean_up” Washington is going to Happen it has to start with the ones in public EYE and the ones abusing their positions

  7. Illinois has 20 electoral votes. While this whole scenario confuses me since the addition of these super electoral votes…if she does not win this state…she would be hard pressed to make that many up somewhere else…unless she had some help…the wrong kind!! Why is anyone surprised that she would stoop this low. I am not for sure.

  8. Unfortunately, given hiLIARy’s previous behavior, she will do whatever it takes (think hook or crook) to get herself on the ballot.

    This low-class piece of trailer trash garbage doesn’t deserve to be an American let alone run for President of the USA!!

  9. Sadly, it will likely be “business as usual” since the Clinton’s seem to successfully skate around every law. One can hope it will stick, just like I hope the inJustice Dept. will criminally indict her over her jeopardizing national security with her unsecured Top Secret emails, but I’m not holding my breath.

  10. Ahhh! Democracy in action! Na there is no voter fraud, therefore this can’t be correct or true. She is an upstanding “citizen” oops I mean lying, untrustworthy, criminal politician.

  11. After 30 years of playing their game – lying – cavorting – leaving people dead in their paths – covering up so many illegal stunts – isn’t it time the two of them get retired back to Arkansas……see how the rednecks feel about them. Hasn’t anyone see “Primary Colors”? Everyone should see it…..Clinton’s all the way. Check it out and it will tell the “old” story.

      • OK….I’ll probably get in a whole lot of trouble for saying this but when I lived in Arkansas and he was governor – the talk was he had police or whoever take him to W. Memphis often so he could enjoy the “women” in certain houses…….the story also was that Hillary didn’t mind because her interests were in “women”. I’m just relaying the talk that was going around back in the 70s. Then with the Rose Law Firm – Whitewater – and others the two of them managed to sweep everything under the carpet and somehow managed to get by without being caught. Just like good old Bill with all the women who came out about him and all he could say was “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” SURE Oh well…..just me spouting off. Again….just repeating what was being circulated back then. Watch Primary Colors….tells a good story

  12. they (democrats) should do to her what they did to justice Scalia…and leave a pillow over her head also !!! we all know they want to change our Constitution…and are more than willing to kill anyone who gets in their way. there will be more deaths, and NO IVESTIGATIONS !!! they did not even check the JUDGE…why not???? they embalmed him so drug tests can not be done !!!!

  13. That lying treasonous murderer should be in prison by now. No, she doesn’t have the right to make her own rules and laws but she does because nobody has the Balls to confront her !! Her name sickens me just to hear it. I can’t believe how many ignorant followers she has that will vote for her. Mostly criminals themselves I’m guessing, NO one with any self respect would stand by this liar !?

    • No, it’s dumbasses like you that are ruining America! People like you who won’t get off their lazy ASSES and work for a living and expect the people who do to feed them and the 10 or more children they fathered by 5 or 6 Ho’s! Now shut your blubbering mouth and stay out of the conversation we are in!!!

  14. an “independent (i.e. democrat controlled) review will mysteriously come up with 3002 valid signatures, allowing her to be on the ballot.

  15. Words not wars, peace, dialogue not bullets, peace, understanding and compassion are the strongest weapons . “…our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children’s future. And we are all mortal.” …”Confident and unafraid, we labor on-not toward a strategy of annihilation but forward toward a strategy of peace.” June 1963 American University speaking of our ‘perceived’ enemies.

  16. You only have to read the first four or five comments that are erroneous n that they only involve slur and anti Clinton garbage and the rest as far as I read is making fun of the grammar errors. This discussion is going nowhere fast.

    • edwin, you are certainly welcome to include your opinion, however, so are the other commenters. Your statement that “You only have to read the first four or five comments that are erroneous n that they only involve slur and anti Clinton garbage” only proves you approve of Killery’s criminal, lying and fraudulent behavior! Call them erroneous, slurs or anti Clinton garbage all you want to. You just refuse to admit that there are numerous, valid reasons to refer to your hero that way! It’s a very good indication of the way the general public thinks of her and it is also being reflected in the current polls! Who are you going to vote for when she is indicted?

      • I don’t have to comment on your ignorance and mis-information, seems like h m rowland is doing a good job on your garbage. I see a lot of your comments are just slurs and insults like most right wingers. I am going to vote for Clinton because she is the best qualified and will be the next President despite all the lies the right wing nut cases put out. She’s been putting up with this bullsh-t for 40 years and is still standing because its all been bullsh-t.

          • Lower calling rates will allow the 2.7 million children of inmates to stay in touch with a parent in prison. Previously all phone calls were paid by the families at a high rate from collect calls. There is a program for 29 dollars a month for unlimited phone calls available. I could find no cases were the government offered free phone calls and no where a family can live with the inmate. babies born in prison can live with the mother in most states up to one years and some have congenial visits. Probably your other points are wrong to like Hubble is Chelsea’s father more conspiracy bullshit you conspiracy nut cases thrive on. This kind of bullsh-t. You are the conspiracy expert what does the hair in the teeth mean

          • today I’m performing a public service on behalf of all the voters. I went back and re-read all the criticisms and attacks and best-selling “exposés” leveled at Hillary Rodham Clinton over the past quarter-century. And I’ve compiled a list of all her High Crimes and Misdemeanors.

            Here they are:

            1. When she was first lady, she murdered White House lawyer Vince Foster and then dumped his body in a park.

            2. She drove Vince Foster to commit suicide through her temper tantrums.

            3. She was having an affair with Vince Foster.

            4. She’s a lesbian.

            5. Chelsea isn’t Bill Clinton’s child.

            6. She murdered Vince Foster to cover up that she once bought a tract of undeveloped land in Arkansas and lost money.

            7. She murdered Vince Foster to cover up her role in firing the White House travel department.

            8. After she murdered Vince Foster, she ransacked his office in the middle of the night and stole all the documents proving her guilt.

            9. When Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas, she was a partner in the state’s top law firm, and it sometimes did work involving the state government.

            10. She once invested in commodities futures on the advice of a friend and made $100,000, proving she’s a crook.

            11. She once invested in real estate on the advice of another friend and lost $100,000, also proving she’s a crook.

            12. Unnamed and unverifiable sources have told Peggy Noonan things about the Clintons that are simply too terrible to repeat.

            13. The personnel murdered at Benghazi make her the first secretary of state to lose overseas personnel to terrorism — apart from Condi Rice, Colin Powell, Madeleine Albright, George Schultz, Dean Rusk and some others.

            14. Four State Department staff were murdered at Benghazi, compared with only 119 others murdered overseas under every secretary of state combined since World War II.

            15. She illegally sent classified emails from her personal server, except that apparently they weren’t classified at the time.

            16. She may have cynically wriggled around the email law by “technically” complying with it.

            17. She once signed a lucrative book contract when she was a private citizen.

            18. Donald Trump says she “should be in jail,” and he’s a serial bankrupt casino developer in Atlantic City, so he should know.

            19. Former House Majority Leader Tom Delay says his “law-enforcement sources” tell him she is “about to be indicted” — and if a man once convicted of money laundering and conspiracy doesn’t have good law-enforcement sources, who does?

            20. She’s a hard-left radical who wants to break up the nuclear family.

            21. She’s a conservative “mousewife” who refused to break up her own family.

            22. She’s in favor of single moms.

            23. She refused to be a single mom.

            24. When she was first lady of Arkansas, she pandered to conservative voters by dyeing her hair.

            25. Before that, she totally insulted them by refusing to.

            26. She’s a frump.

            27. She spends too much money on designer dresses.

            28. She has “cankles.”

            29. She has a grating voice.

            30. She yells into the microphone.

            31. She spent 18 years in Arkansas and some of the people she knew turned out to be crazy rednecks and crooks.

            32. She’s in the pay of the mafia.

            33. She’s in the pay of the Chinese government.

            34. She’s in the pay of the Wall Street banks.

            35. In order to suppress the billing records from her time at the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, she cleverly packed them up and took them to the White House rather than shredding them.

            36. When she handed over the documents to public officials, they couldn’t find any evidence she’d committed any crimes, so she must have doctored them.

            37. Congress spent tens of millions of dollars and six years investigating her investment in the Whitewater real-estate project, and, while they didn’t actually find anything, they wouldn’t have spent all that money if there weren’t something there.

            38. By cleverly hiding all evidence of her crimes in the Whitewater affair, she caused Congress to waste all that taxpayers’ money.

            39. When she ran for senator of New York, she was still a fan of the Chicago Cubs.

            40. She once said the Clintons were thinking of adopting a child, and they didn’t follow through.

            41. She was photographed holding her hand near her mouth during the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.

            42. She’s got brain damage.

            43. She’s old.

            44. She’s really ambitious and calculating, unlike all the other people running for president.

            45. She secretly supported Palestinian terrorists, Puerto Rican terrorists and Guatemalan terrorists.

            46. She secretly supported a group that wants to give Maine back to the Indians.

            47. She’s a secret follower of “radical prophet” Saul Alinsky.

            48. She did her law degree at Yale, and it’s a well-known “socialist finishing school.”

            49. When she was young, she did things to build up her résumé rather than just for their own good.

            50. When Bill was president, she “allowed” him to keep people waiting.

            51. She’s married to a sex addict.

            52. She’s an enemy of traditional marriage.

            53. She didn’t divorce her husband.

            54. His philandering is her fault because she is too strong, and too weak, and too frumpy, and too fat, and too cold.

            55. She’s hostile to women who fool around with her husband.

            56. A divorced taxi driver in Florida told me that if Hillary is elected president, “women will take over everything.”

            57. She insulted Tammy Wynette.

            58. When they left the White House, she and Bill bought a big house in New York that they couldn’t afford.

            59. She sometimes calls her staff during dinner, even when they’re out at a restaurant.

            60. She claimed there was a “vast right-wing conspiracy” against her husband, and it turned out there was nothing but a bunch of tycoons financing private investigators, and some fake think tanks and books and news sites and stuff.

            61. When she got married, she didn’t “stay at home and bake cookies.”

            62. She supported the Iraq war because she’s a secret foreign-policy conservative.

            63. She’s a secret foreign-policy radical with a plan to impose worldwide “radical social experimentation” through the World Bank.

            64. She is secretly plotting to let children sue their parents for making them take out the garbage.

            65. She looked bored during the Benghazi hearings.

            66. Oh, yeah — and she totally has a vagina.

            It’s clear: Hillary must be stopped. Hearings now!

          • you have got it. Just like with Obama lets revue a few of those just like Hillary Have you heard some crazy rumor about Barack Obama and want the straight story? The Debunker’s Guide to Obama Conspiracy Theories is a compilation of many of the strange tales and unfounded rumors that fly over the Internet about Obama, and particularly alternate accounts of his birth. Each one is carefully researched with references you can use to correct misinformation and know the facts.

            Table of Categories:

            Obama’s birth certificate

            Other claims about Obama’s birth in Hawaii

            Obama born in Kenya stories

            Obama in Indonesia stories

            Obama’s Selective Service registration

            Obama’s social-security number

            Obama legal fees and sealing records

            Obama higher education claims

            Obama is not a natural born citizen because of his parentage

            Other strange stories

            Let the claims begin!

            Obama’s birth certificate

            Nothing defines the birther movement more than controversy over Barack Obama’s birth certificate. Birthers demand that Obama release his birth certificate, when in fact he did already, back in June of 2008. For more information debunking birth certificate claims, see also here, here, here and here. Birthers claim that:

            The document has been amended.

            The location of birth is a clerical error.

            The location of birth is really the location of registration.

            Hawaii allows registration of any child in Hawaii over one year old as being born in Hawaii.

            Hawaii allows residents to register foreign-born children as being born in Hawaii.

            Obama was adopted from a foreign country

            Block 7(c) of the birth registration form allows the entry of a foreign country for place of birth.

            The Obama document is a “Certification”, not a “Certificate”.

            A Certification of Live Birth is not a birth certificate. See also here.

            There were no laser printers when Obama was born in 1961.

            Recorded information may have been altered and a new birth certificate issued showing different information pursuant to HRS §338-17.7.

            Hawaii Act 96 allows for a birth certificate to be issued for someone born out of state. (It doesn’t)

            Sun Yat-Sen the first President of China has a Hawaiian birth certificate and he was born in China so this proves anybody can get a Hawaiian birth certificate. See also here.

            The Department of Hawaii Homelands declared that the short-form birth certificate was not sufficient evidence and also that such a certificate is not proof of birth in Hawaii.

            Obama’s mother didn’t live at the address listed on the birth certificate. See also.

            Obama’s birth registration was created by his grandparents, and not by a physician. The attending physician was David A Sinclair, MD.

            Obama’s birth certificate lacks the state seal and here.

            Obama’s birth certificate lacks an official’s signature.

            Obama’s birth certificate lacks a certificate number.

            The Registrar’s stamp on Obama’s short form certificate is a rubber stamp (as it should be).

            Image recovery techniques prove the certificate number is missing in original scanned images.

            Obama’s birth certificate was invalidated when the certificate number was covered.

            The certificate number proves Obama was not born in a hospital. See also here.

            Obama’s birth certificate has the wrong certificate number.

            Obama’s birth certificate has the wrong registration date.

            Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery. See also and also.

            Barack Obama has a Canadian birth certificate.

            The Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams verified that Obama has no long-form birth certificate.

            Obama’s refusal to release his long form birth certificate proves he has something to hide. See also.

            Obama’s birth certificate is a fake because the father’s race was “African.” See also.

            Obama’s long form birth certificate is a fake because the PDF version has “layers.” A detailed analysis of various claims that Obama’s long form certificate is a fake is found in John Woodman’s book: Is Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate a Fraud? see also this video.

            There are multiple versions of Obama’s 2011 PDF certificate file.

            OCR does not explain the layers in Obama’s birth certificate.

            Obama’s birth certificate has too many/too few layers.

            Obama’s birth certificate has too many one-bit layers.

            The raised seal on Obama’s 2007 Certification of Live Birth is debossed instead of embossed. (It’s normal.)

            Obama’s long form has curved text but the background is not curved.

            The letters on Obama’s long form are not all the same shape, suggesting a composite image from multiple typewriters. See also.

            Some letters on Obama’s long form are curved less than the surrounding text.

            The long form says Obama’s father was born in Kenya, East Africa. Kenya didn’t exist until 3 years later.

            Obama attorney Alexandra Hill admitted Obama’s birth certificate is fake. (She didn’t.)

            Penciled data entry codes are inconsistent with written values. (They aren’t.)

            A professional law-enforcement investigation of Obama’s birth certificate in Arizona proved the document a fake. The so-called anomalies on the PDF certificate are the normal processing of a Xerox WorkCentre 7655 copier/scanner opened and saved with Preview on a Mac computer.

            Obama’s birth certificate is too small.

            Obama’s father’s age is wrong on the birth certificate.

            The hospital name on Obama’s birth certificate is wrong for the time period.

            Douglas Vogt identified 20 points of forgery in the birth certificates. See also here, here, and here.

            A credentialed document examiner, Reed Hayes, has stated that the White House PDF birth certificate is a 100% forgery. Until the Hayes report is released, its conclusions, whatever they are, cannot be debunked or verified.

            Hawaii Department of Health director Loretta Fuddy took a $50,000 bribe to fake Obama’s birth certificate.

            The security paper pattern on Obama’s long form birth certificate is too small.

            Governor Abercrombie of Hawaii couldn’t find Obama’s birth certificate. Claim by celebrity journalist Mike Evans was retracted.

            Other claims about Obama’s birth in Hawaii

            The newspaper announcement of Obama’s birth was an ad placed by his parents.

            All microfilm copies worldwide of the Honolulu Advertiser and Star Bulletin relating to Obama’s birth have been replaced by fake ones.

            No one remembers young Obama in Hawaii (except Governor Abercrombie of Hawaii and his kindergarten teachers and classmates).

            Obama relatives cannot agree on which hospital was Obama’s birthplace.

            Obama has never acknowledged the hospital where he was born.

            Hawaii hospitals all deny Obama was born there. All but one and see video here.

            Obama/Dunham Divorce Decree says One Child Born in Kenya.

            The letters “TXE” signal a forgery. See also.

            Scanner/software expert says Obama long-form birth certificate a forgery. (Also claims to know when, to the minute, that the Sun will go nova and start the next ice age.)

            Obama born in Kenya stories

            Obama’s step grandmother, Sarah Obama, said on tape that the President was born in the Kenya and she was there. See also here.

            Obama family members say President Obama was born in Kenya. See also here.

            There is a Kenyan Birth Certificate for Barack Obama. See here, and also here.

            There is another Kenyan Birth Certificate for Barack Obama.

            The Kenyan ambassador to the US said that Obama was born in Kenya.

            The Associated Press said in 2004 that Obama was born in Kenya.

            The Kenyan minister of lands said Obama was born in Kenya. He did, but he never explains how he knew. See also here.

            Kenyan newspapers say Obama was born in Kenya. See also here and here.

            Michelle Obama said Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

            Road signs entering Kenya say “Welcome to Kenya: Birthplace of Barack Obama.”

            Obama’s literary biography says he was born in Kenya.

            Obama in Indonesia stories

            Obama’s school registration proves he was an Indonesian citizen

            Obama was an Indonesian national because he went to school in Indonesia where only Indonesians could attend.

            Obama was adopted by his Indonesian step-father. See also here.

            Obama automatically became an Indonesian citizen when he was adopted at age 5 .

            Obama’s Selective Service registration

            Obama is ineligible to be president because he failed to register for the Selective Service, a prerequisite for a federal job. See also here.

            Ohama’s Selective Service registration document is fake, see also here.

            The Selective Service computer system will not confirm Obama’s registration. (It did.)

            Obama’s social-security number

            Two issues were raised about President Obama’s social-security number, which had become public through faulty redaction of the President’s income tax returns. One deals with the fact that the number itself is usually associated with Connecticut residents, and that there are some unidentified public records tying Obama’s number with one or more other names. Obama Conspiracy Theories has several articles dealing with social-security numbers and Obama. Here are some particular claims:

            Obama has 39 social-security numbers.

            Obama has a Connecticut social-security number and that means fraud. See also here.

            Obama is using the social-security number of a deceased individual.

            Obama is using the social-security number of Jean Paul Ludwig.

            eVerify response indicates Obama’s number is fraudulent. See also here.

            Obama legal fees and sealing records

            Obama has spent millions in legal fees keeping his birth certificate secret. This is further nonsense since Obama freely released his birth certificate.

            An Obama executive order sealed all his records.

            Obama’s records are all sealed. See also this article from FactCheck.org.

            Obama higher education claims

            Obama registered as a foreign student at Occidental College to get financial aid. This was actually an April Fool joke, but it is still widely believed. Follow-up story here and here.

            Obama went to Occidental College under a Fulbright scholarship. Silly since Fulbright scholarships are for graduate study and Obama was an undergrad at Occidental.

            Obama went under the name “Barry Soetoro” at Occidental College. See also.

            Nobody remembers Obama at Columbia College. See also classmate Wolf and Professor Baron.

            Obama funneled guns to the Taliban for the CIA while a student. Too silly to debunk, but listed for reference.

            Obama’s Columbia University ID lists him as a “foreign student.” Politifact rated this “pants on fire.” See also here.

            Obama is not a natural born citizen because of his parentage

            The idea that Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen even if born in the US is not a “conspiracy theory;” it is a legal theory. The best compilation debunking this claim is the report of the Congressional Research Service: Qualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility Requirement.

            For a general review, see: Natural Born Citizen for Dummies. For a compendium of citations about natural born citizen, see The Great Mother of All Natural Born Citizen Quotation Pages, other articles on citizenship on this site, our Citizenship bookmarks, and Books on Google that define “natural born citizen.” See also John Woodman’s series of articles. Since 2008 at least 11 courts have ruled specifically on this question as it pertains to Barack Obama and all have affirmed that if born in Hawaii, Obama is a natural born citizen. Also see my article here and here.

            Specific debunked claims:

            The Supreme Court in Minor v Happersett defined natural born citizen as requiring two citizen parents.

            The Law of Nations by E. Vattel defined natural born citizen as requiring two citizen parents.

            The US Constitution incorporates the Law of Nations by reference.

            The Supreme Court cited Vattel in United States v Wong Kim Ark.

            Supreme Court Case Perkins v. Elg proves a natural born citizen must have two US parents.

            No court has ruled on the merits of claims that Obama is not a natural born citizen because of his father’s British citizenship.

            Other strange stories

            Barack Obama traveled to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport. See also.

            Barack Obama was raised by communists.

            Google says Obama is a socialist.

            Barack Obama Committed Perjury on his Illinois Bar Application.

            Michelle Obama was disbarred. See also.

            Barack Obama was forced to surrender his law license or face ethics charges.

            CIA DNA Test Reveals Barack Obama was ADOPTED. This one is too silly to debunk but I wanted to document the incredible story.

            Obama sat on the board of the Annenberg Foundation that runs FactCheck.org.

            Barack Obama is a British citizen.

            Barack Obama was going to change the military oath so that soldiers would swear allegiance to him personally. This was meant to be a joke, but, well…

            Obama is the Anti-Christ. And here. And here.

            Barack Obama’s best-selling 1995 memoir, Dreams from My Father, was ghostwritten by Bill Ayers.

            Barack Obama told veterans to “stop whining” about having to pay for their own health care.

            Obama has issued more executive orders than any president in history (actually fewer).

            Obama went by the name Soetoro in high school.

            Obama was a time traveler to Mars when he was a teenager.

            Obama is a Muslim

            Obama wears a ring with an Islamic inscription

            Obama refused to say the Pledge of Allegiance

            Obama removed the flag from Air Force 1 and replaced it with his campaign logo

            Barack Obama won election through hypnosis

        • she is a liar, she is dishonest, she has murdered Americans, she has lost information for investigations, she has a wild raping husband, she wants to allow militants into America, she wants power for herself and she is greedy. She cares nothing about America, she wants POWER!

          • Hillary is not a criminal, a liar or anything else you mentioned and her husband is not running for President. First the Hacker thing, the hacker pleaded guilty to a crime that nobody could find he had committed. As this article points out at best the so called email scandal is a rules violation at best says the IG. The only way the Republications can win is destroy Clinton. They have been trying for decades with lies and mis information.
            FACT: None Of The Emails Sent To Clinton Were Labeled As “Classified” Or “Top Secret”
            FACT: Emails Originated In State Dept. System, And Questions About Retroactive Classification Would Have Occurred Regardless Of Clinton’s Server Use
            FACT: Experts Have Debunked Any Comparison Between Clinton’s Email Use And David Petraeus’ Crimes
            FACT: IG Referral To Justice Department Was Not Criminal, And FBI Isn’t Targeting Clinton Herself
            Intelligence Community IG Says Two Emails From Clinton’s Server Should Be Marked “Top Secret”
            Intelligence Community Inspector General Says Two Emails From Clinton’s Server Contain “Top Secret” Information. The inspector general for the Intelligence Community (ICIG), I. Charles McCullough, reportedly informed leaders of key congressional oversight committees that two classified emails previously discovered on Clinton’s server contain top secret information. As McClatchy reported:
            The inspector general for the Intelligence Community notified senior members of Congress that two of four classified emails discovered on the server Clinton maintained at her New York home contained material deemed to be in one of the highest security classifications – more sensitive than previously known.
            The notice came as the State Department inspector general’s office acknowledged that it is reviewing the use of “personal communications hardware and software” by Clinton’s former top aides after requests from Congress. [McClatchy DC, 8/11/15]
            State Department: It Remains Unclear Whether Material In Two Emails Should Be Retroactively Classified. NBC noted that the State Department is still working with the intelligence community to determine whether the information in the two emails should in fact be labeled as classified:
            Clinton aides have maintained that nothing on her server was classified at the time she saw it, suggesting that classified messages were given the label after the fact.
            John Kirby, a spokesman for the State Department, said that was the case with two emails, adding that it remained unclear “whether, in fact, this material is actually classified.”

            “Department employees circulated these emails on unclassified systems in 2009 and 2011, and ultimately some were forwarded to Secretary Clinton,” Kirby said Tuesday. “They were not marked as classified.” [NBC News, 8/12/15]
            MYTH: Clinton Received Emails Marked As “Top Secret”
            Fox Anchor Bret Baier: “‘Top Secret’ Was Marked On The Emails” Sent To Clinton. During the August 11 edition of Special Report, host Bret Baier claimed that “‘top secret’ was marked on the emails” that Clinton received during her time as secretary of state:
            MIKE EMANUEL: The breaking news of the hour is that the intelligence inspector general has told top lawmakers on Capitol Hill that two of those four classified emails from Hillary Clinton’s personal server were top secret in nature. And they’re still studying the other two to figure out what the relevant classification should be. Bret?
            BRET BAIER: ‘Top secret’ marked on the emails. FBI inquiry obviously already ongoing to classified information improperly stored, they said, on her private server. And also, Mike, a thumb drive held by her attorney?
            EMANUEL: Well that’s absolutely correct. All of her emails have been stored by her personal attorney. And a lot of folks on Capitol Hill have been asking, why is that still out there? Why is that not controlled by the intelligence community or by the State department, this existing in the possession of a personal attorney. And so lots more questions on Capitol Hill and throughout the intelligence community this evening. [Fox News, Special Report, 8/11/15]
            NBC’s Andrea Mitchell: ICIG “Contradicted Clinton’s Repeated Claim That Nothing On Those Private Emails Was Classified.” On the August 12 edition of NBC’s Today, Andrea Mitchell argued that the ICIG’s statement “contradicted” Clinton’s “repeated past denials”:
            ANDREA MITCHELL: More controversy for Hillary Clinton today indeed. Despite her repeated past denials, the intelligence community’s Inspector General now says two of her emails should have been classified ‘top secret,’ the highest level of U.S. intelligence, even as the FBI is finally getting control of that private server.
            VOICEOVER OF MITCHELL: Hillary Clinton, in New Hampshire Tuesday, has aides confirm she has turned over her private server to the FBI. In addition, her attorney David Kendall gave the FBI two thumb drives containing her emails. All of this, as the intelligence community’s watchdog contradicted Clinton’s repeated claim that nothing on those private emails was classified.
            [CLIP OF HILLARY CLINTON: I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified materials.]
            MITCHELL: Clinton has said there was no classified markings on any of her emails.
            [CLIP OF CLINTON: I am confident that I have never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received.]
            MITCHELL: But the Inspector General has now told Congress two of Clinton’s emails should have been classified ‘top secret,’ with code words indicating electronic eavesdropping from satellites, so sensitive it could not be shared with foreign allies. [NBC, Today, 8/12/15]
            FACT: None Of The Emails Sent To Clinton Were Labeled As “Classified” Or “Top Secret”
            Government Officials: None Of The Emails Were Marked As “Classified” When They Were Sent. The Washington Post reported that when the ICIG first “found information that should have been designated as classified” in four emails from Clinton’s server — two of which he now says contain “top secret” information — government officials acknowledged that the emails were not marked as classified when they were sent (emphasis added):
            The Justice Department said Friday that it has been notified of a potential compromise of classified information in connection with the private e-mail account that Hillary Rodham Clinton used while serving as secretary of state.
            A Justice official said the department had received a “referral” on the matter, which the inspector general of the intelligence agencies later acknowledged came from him.
            The inspector general, I. Charles McCullough III, said in a separate statement that he had found information that should have been designated as classified in four e-mails out of a “limited sample” of 40 that his agency reviewed. As a result, he said, he made the “security referral,” acting under a federal law that requires alerting the FBI to any potential compromises of national security information.
            Officials acknowledged that none of the e-mails reviewed so far contain information that was marked classified when they were sent. But a new inquiry would prolong the political controversy Clinton is facing over her un­or­tho­dox e-mail system. [The Washington Post, 7/24/15]
            IG Memo On Classified Information In Emails: “None Of The Emails … Had Classification Or Dissemination Markings.” A memo from the ICIG clearly stated that “none of the emails we reviewed had classification or dissemination markings”:
            Since the referenced 25 June 2015 notification, we were informed by State FOIA officials that there are potentially hundreds of classified emails within the approximately 30,000 provided by former Secretary Clinton. We note that none of the emails we reviewed had classification or dissemination markings, but some included IC-derived classified information and should have been handled as classified, appropriately marked, and transmitted via a secure network. Further, my office’s limited sampling of 40 of the emails revealed four contained classified IC information which should have been marked and handled at a SECRET level. [Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, 7/23/15]
            MYTH: Emails Weren’t Marked As “Classified” Because Clinton Used A Private Server Instead Of State Dept. Email
            Fox & Friends’ Steve Doocy: Emails “Were Never Classified” Because Clinton Used A Private Server Rather Than The State Department’s Email System. Throughout the August 12 edition of Fox & Friends, co-host Steve Doocy repeatedly blamed the lack of classification on Clinton’s use of a private server instead of “the State Department email system,” arguing the emails “were never classified because she never submitted it” (emphasis added):
            STEVE DOOCY: The problem here is the fact that she didn’t want her bosses at the White House to know what she was writing about, it is perceived.
            ANDREW NAPOLITANO: She also didn’t want her colleagues in the State Department to know.
            DOOCY: Right. So she had her own server, which is, you know, against protocol. Her spokespeople, and she herself has said, you know, it wasn’t classified at the time. But that ignores how the process works. The reason you use the State Department email system is so that it is classif – it is vetted before you hit ‘send.’
            NAPOLITANO: She is probably going to argue that because the phrase, boom, ‘top secret’ was not stamped on each document, it wasn’t top secret. That’s not what the law says. Before every person in the federal government, from the president to a file clerk, gets a national security clearance, they have a 30 minute in-person interview with an FBI agent who explains, if there’s doubt about whether it’s classified or not, it’s classified.
            DOOCY: Let me just add this one thing. It was never classified because she never submitted it. [Fox News, Fox & Friends, 8/12/15]
            FACT: Emails Originated In State Dept. System And Questions About Retroactive Classification Would Have Occurred Regardless Of Clinton’s Server Use
            Emails Originated With State Department Employees And Were Forwarded To Clinton. The State Department’s statement on the retroactive “top secret” designation made clear that the emails at issue originated with State Department employees, not Clinton herself:
            The following is attributable to Spokesperson John Kirby:
            “The State Department takes seriously its obligations to protect sensitive information, holding its employees to a high standard of compliance with regulations and procedures.
            “The Intelligence Community has recommended that portions of two of the four emails identified by the Intelligence Community’s Inspector General should be upgraded to the Top Secret level. Department employees circulated these emails on unclassified systems in 2009 and 2011 and ultimately some were forwarded to Secretary Clinton. They were not marked as classified.
            “These emails have not been released to the public. While we work with the Director of National Intelligence to resolve whether, in fact, this material is actually classified, we are taking steps to ensure the information is protected and stored appropriately.” [Twitter.com, 8/11/15]
            Clinton Campaign: Emails Originated From “Unclassified .Gov Email System.” A fact sheet released by the presidential campaign for the former secretary of state explains that the emails at issue originated on “the unclassified .gov email system”:
            Would this issue not have arisen if she used a state.gov email address?
            Even if Clinton’s emails had been on a government email address and government device, these questions would be raised prior to public release.
            While State Department’s review of her 55,000 emails brought the issue to the Inspectors Generals’ attentions, the four emails were on the unclassified .gov email system. They were not on the separate, closed system used by State Department for handling classified communications. [hillaryclinton.com, “Updated: The Facts About Hillary Clinton’s Emails,” accessed 8/12/15]
            Vox: Whether Or Not Emails Should Have Been Marked Classified Is Part Of “Bureaucratic Turf War.” Vox pointed out how the intra-agency disagreement over whether the emails were appropriately categorized “is a bureaucratic fight about how the State Department has handled the emails, not about Hillary Clinton” (emphasis added):
            The State Department has been ordered by a federal judge to make public the 55,000 pages of emails Clinton turned over to the agency. So the State Department has Freedom of Information Act experts sifting through the documents to make sure that no information will be released that is either classified or sensitive (meaning not technically classified but also not covering material that the government doesn’t want in the public domain).
            This has caused a bureaucratic turf war between the department and the intelligence community, which believes at least one email that’s already been released contains classified information and that hundreds of others in the full set may also have material that’s not ready for public consumption. For a couple of months, the inspectors general of the State Department and the combined intelligence community agencies have been battling Patrick Kennedy, the lead State Department official, over who has access to the documents and the authority to release or withhold them.
            Now, according to the Times and other publications, the IG team is asking the Justice Department to get involved in reviewing whether State has mishandled the emails. If Clinton was sending information that was, or should have been, classified — and knew that it was, or should have been, classified — that’s a problem. But no one has accused her of that so far. Given the anodyne nature of what she sent in the emails we’ve already seen, it’s entirely possible, perhaps even likely, that any sensitive information was sent to Clinton, not by her (though it’s not clear whether forwarding such emails would constitute a legal issue for her). [Vox, 7/28/15]
            MYTH: Hillary Clinton’s Email Use Is Comparable To David Petraeus’ Crimes
            Doocy: Clinton’s Email Use Is “The Same Thing That David Petraeus Pleaded Guilty To.” On the August 12 edition of Fox News’ Fox & Friends, Doocy hyped the debunked claim that Clinton’s email use was similar to Gen. David Petraeus’ illegal mishandling of confidential information:
            DOOCY: Big question is — Will this Department of Justice go ahead and fully prosecute? Because, keep in mind, she had unauthorized, for a home server, top secret documents, which was a direct violation of the U.S. laws. It’s the same that David Petraeus pleaded guilty to. He had the same stuff at his house. She had at it at her house. He got, you know, they ran him up the flag pole, will they do the same for her? [Fox News, Fox & Friends,8/12/15]
            Fox Judicial Analyst Implies Clinton’s Email Use Is Worse Than Petraeus’ Crimes. Appearing on the August 12 edition of Fox & Friends, senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano claimed “it’s a grave situation” for Hillary Clinton, arguing that Gen. Petraeus only had “the lowest level materials in a desk drawer” while Clinton “had top secret materials in the server in her barn”:

            The New York Times first reported the referral. The Clinton campaign said Friday that she “followed appropriate practices in dealing with classified materials.” Spokesman Nick Merrill said emails deemed classified by the administration were done so after the fact, not when they were sent.
            One U.S. official said it was unclear whether classified information was mishandled and the referral doesn’t suggest wrongdoing by Clinton herself. [Associated Press, 7/24/15]
            Wash. Post: Officials Say Clinton “Is Not A Target” Of FBI Probe. The Washington Post reported that government officials said Clinton is “not a target” of the FBI’s investigation:
            Hillary Rodham Clinton’s attorney has agreed to provide the FBI with the private server that housed her e-mail during her four years as secretary of state, Clinton’s presidential campaign said Tuesday.
            The inquiry by the FBI is considered preliminary and appears to be focused on ensuring the proper handling of classified material. Officials have said that Clinton, the Democratic presidential front-runner, is not a target.
            The FBI’s efforts have included contacting the Denver-based technology firm that helped manage the Clintons’ unusual private ­e-mail system. [The Washington Post, 8/11/1]

  17. The people in our country knows she can only win by corruption and lies. She should be in jail. The people need to wake up and smell the roses.

    • the only thing that [from hell] Hitlery [cess pool oif corruption] Clinton should be allowed to run for is San Quenton Prisoner’s Cell Cleaner.

  18. It SHOULD.. but HERE? In “The Great State of Corruption?” Where CRook County keeps electing one crooked politician after another and we put as many of them in prison as possible? (The FORMER Governor count CURRENTLY incarcerated stands a two (one each Democrat and Republican) and a second Democrat not too many years back (Dan Walker). SOOO while she SHOULDN’T BE allowed to get on the ballot now…

  19. Without the scandals, Monica Lewinsky’s Ex-Boyfriend’s Wife has no record.
    Without Bill, Monica Lewinsky’s Ex-Boyfriend’s Wife is just another crooked lawyer.

    Chicago is famous for three things: Pizza, gangsters, and corrupt politicians. Monica Lewinsky’s Ex-Boyfriend’s Wife is not a pizza.

    • she lost her emails. she can not remember where she putt them. but she did promise as soon as i find them i will turn them over to obama. obama said he doesn’t want them.

  20. The public needs to remember …

    THE CLINTON
    BODY BAGS

    Food for Thought

    Just a quick refresher course lest we forget what has happened to many
    “friends” of the

    Clintons.

    1- James McDougal – Clintons convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent
    heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s
    investigation.

    2 – Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997
    at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown .. The murder happened just after
    she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House.

    3 – Vince Foster – Former White House councilor, and colleague of Hillary
    Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a
    suicide.

    4 – Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have
    died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time
    of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a
    deal with prosecutors. The rest of the people on the plane also died. A few days later
    the air Traffic controller committed suicide.

    5 – C. Victor Raiser, II – Raiser, a major player in the Clinton fund raising
    organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.

    6 – Paul Tulley – Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead
    in a hotel room in Little Rock , September 1992. Described by Clinton as a “dear
    friend and trusted advisor”.

    7 – Ed Willey – Clinton fundraiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods
    in VA of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.

    8 – Jerry Parks – Head of Clinton’s gubernatorial security team in Little Rock
    .. Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock Park’s son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.

    9 – James Bunch – Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a
    “Black Book” of people which contained names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas.

    10 – James Wilson – Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging
    suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater..

    11 – Kathy Ferguson – Ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, was found
    dead in May 1994, in her living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she were going somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.

    12 – Bill Shelton – Arkansas State Trooper and fiancee of Kathy Ferguson.
    Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancee, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancee.

    13 – Gandy Baugh – Attorney for Clinton’s friend Dan Lassater, died by jumping
    out a window of a tall building January, 1994. His client was a convicted drug distributor.

    14 – Florence Martin – Accountant & sub-contractor for the CIA, was related
    to the Barry Seal, Mena, Arkansas, airport drug smuggling case. He died of three gunshot wounds.

    15 – Suzanne Coleman – Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was
    Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.

    16 – Paula Grober – Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until
    her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one car accident.

    17 – Danny Casolaro – Investigative reporter. Investigating Mena Airport and
    Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists, apparently, in the middle of his investigation.

    18 – Paul Wilcher – Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with
    Casolaro and the 1980 “October Surprise” was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993, in his Washington DC apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno 3 weeks before his death.

    19 – Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp.
    Jumped to his death from his Arlington, Virginia apartment balcony August 15, 1993. He was investigating the Morgan Guaranty scandal.

    20 – Barbara Wise – Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown
    and John Huang. Cause of death unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Her bruised, nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.

    21 – Charles Meissner – Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang
    special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.

    22 – Dr. Stanley Heard – Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care
    Advisory Committee died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton ‘s advisory council personally treated Clinton’s mother, stepfather and brother.

    23 – Barry Seal – Drug running TWA pilot out of Mena Arkansas, death was no
    accident.

    24 – Johnny Lawhorn, Jr. – Mechanic, found a check made out to Bill Clinton in
    the trunk of a car left at his repair shop. He was found dead after his car had hit a utility
    pole.

    25 – Stanley Huggins – Investigated Madison Guaranty. His death was a purported
    suicide and his report was never released.

    26 – Hershell Friday – Attorney and Clinton fundraiser died March 1, 1994, when
    his plane exploded.

    27 – Kevin Ives & Don Henry – Known as “The boys on the track”
    case. Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. A controversial case, the initial report of death said, due to falling asleep on railroad tracks. Later reports claim the 2 boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.

    THE FOLLOWING PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES/HENRY CASE:

    28 – Keith Coney – Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck,
    7/88.

    29 – Keith McMaskle – Died, stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988

    30 – Gregory Collins – Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.

    31 – Jeff Rhodes – He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in
    April 1989.

    3 2 – James Milan – Found decapitated. However, the Coroner ruled his death was
    due to natural causes”.

    33 – Jordan Kettleson – Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup
    truck in June 1990.

    34 – Richard Winters – A suspect in the Ives/Henry deaths. He was killed in a
    set-up robbery July 1989.

    THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD:

    36 – Major William S. Barkley, Jr.

    37 – Captain Scott J . Reynolds

    38 – Sgt. Brian Hanley

    39 – Sgt. Tim Sabel

    40 – Major General William Robertson

    41 – Col. William Densberger

    42 – Col. Robert Kelly

    43 – Spec. Gary Rhodes

    44 – Steve Willis

    45 – Robert Williams

    46 – Conway LeBleu

    47 – Todd McKeehan

    Quite an impressive list! Pass this on. Let the public become aware of what
    happens to friends of the Clintons!

  21. Hillary and Obama both did the same thing in the last election. What did she do, submit the same old signatures from the last time? They should have taken the number of delegates in Illinois away from Obama in the last election, but when it was discovered it may have been sometime after the election. I still think if it had put the election in favor of Romney, the election should have been made null and given to Romney. This was just another case of voter fraud by the Dems.

  22. If Shitlery Clintorius is involved, so is corruption. They NEED to see this through and make absolutely certain that they drag her through the sewer she so enjoys residing in. It would be a great day, indeed, to see this bear some fruit.

  23. hillary’s team is corrupt as hell…they have already been caught,on video,twice for voter fraud so far in this election!…twice already!on video!…if it were Trump or Carson and Cruz,the MSM liberal left would be crusifing them,but not with hillary,so this comes at no surprise to me at all,liberals love to use dead people for votes,and multiple votes from the same people and don’t forget mickey mouse and hitler too!
    when it comes to the left,this is just business as usual!
    what is a surprise is it was Illinois that brought it to the board!that is odd,maybe that state has had enough of the left?hmm…………..

  24. As ALWAYS, this evil woman will get by with her usual corruption. I wouldn’t doubt in the background, like Ovomit would do also, she would use HER thug tactics by threatening anyone that gets in her way to the highest office. As we ALL know, this wouldn’t be the first time for her to find an ILLEGAL way to get HER WAY. Maybe as I see in some reports, karma will finally catch up to her and she’ll destroy her bid ALL BY HERSELF. Wouldn’t that be nice?

  25. The clinton’s are corrupt and will do anything for power.

    Anyone especially a woman backing this lying, disgusting, untrustworthy, irresponsible, irrational, self-centered, obnoxious, overbearing, heartless, hateful, evil, vile, dangerous, security risk, b—h, killery clinton are nothing but a hot pile of hot steaming obama. They are not worth a damn walking riding or flying and want to destroy America.

    • Not all of them, sadly all too many are merely ignorant FOOLS who continue to buy into the pretty lies and propaganda they’ve been spoon fed by the garbage they’ve chosen to blindly follow. Dr Goebbels would be SOO proud of the useless tools and fools.

  26. The only Big House that Hillary is headed for is the big white one at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Obama’s Justice Department will block any action against her, and with the votes of blacks, Hispanics, and women across the board, she is a sure winner.

  27. They couldn’t even get THREE THOUSAND VALID signatures for he to be on the ballot. WHAT A BUNCH OF DOPES…….Looks like Bernie should win Illinois

  28. What SHOULD happen is that the law should be enforced, and Hillary’s name removed from Illinois’ ballot. What WILL happen remains to be seen, even though past history indicates that this legal “hiccup” will be swept under the rug, and her name will remain on the state’s ballot.

  29. It seems I’ve heard about this “Name Petition Ballot Campaign” Before–where an
    ‘unknown Barack Obama’ hired 2 lawyers to “Disqualify more than 1,000 names” on
    2 candidates who opposed him in the State Senate, one which endorsed him to run
    for her seat she had left–to run against “Jesse Jackson” for Senator–she lost &
    returned to ask Obama to yield his seat back again to Her–He refused & she had to
    gather ‘Signatures’ to run on a Independent ticket–he disqualified her & then ran
    “Unopposed”-! And then afterward–“Ran for U.S. Senate from Illinois-! She had
    originally be his “Mentor & Introduced him to Politics”-! After that Snub–She voted
    for Hillary Clinton-! She’d learned “Her Lesson” well–after being stabbed in the back!

  30. Clinton’s delegate filing includes some pretty big names, too: Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle, state Sen. Andy Manar and Shirley Madigan, wife of Illinois Democratic Chairman and House Speaker Mike Madigan.
    Speaker Madigan, Mayor Rahm Emanuel, U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin and other big shots are expected to be super-delegates to the Democratic convention, allowing them to attend and vote without standing for election themselves

  31. 3,000 minimum requirement to appear on a state’s ballot? You’ve got to be kidding me! It should be 100,000 VALID signatures by 100,000 VALID U.S. citizens! With ACORN-like organizations nationwide scrambling to register illegal aliens, chances are the minimum number of signatures in EVERY state have been completely bogus, but we’ll never know about it if those states are run by Democrats! They’re just as crooked as Hillary Clinton!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here