Ocasio-Cortez LOSES IT, Slanders GOP Ad

Image credit: The Epoch Times

She can’t even handle the thought of it…

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) decried a GOP PAC ad that aired during the Democrat debate. She called the ad, which targeted her socialist ideas, “violent,” “false,” and a “love letter to the GOP’s white supremacist case.”

“This is the face of socialism and ignorance,” Heng said. “Does Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez know the horror of socialism?”

“My father was minutes from death in Cambodia before a forced marriage saved his life. That’s socialism. Forced obedience. Starvation. Mine is a face of freedom. My skin is not white. I’m not outrageous, racist or socialist. I’m a Republican,” she continued:

However, Ocasio-Cortez asserted that the ad used her image due to racism, rather than the socialist ideology she routinely espouses.

“Republicans are running TV ads setting pictures of me on fire to convince people they aren’t racist,” she wrote.

“Life is weird!” she exclaimed, calling the ad “a love letter to the GOP’s white supremacist case”:


    • Harvey .. I can bet that a good many people in the US American public can easily tell why aoc could well might have been very popular at (bar) her previous place of employment. She’s so full of crap and idiotic to the point that she’s ridiculously entertaining. She’s not close to being a funny comedian .. however, who can resist but to have a good laugh at the expense of the stupid conduct of one total fool.

  1. Nothing of good will ever come out of Congress, for as long as “We .. the (USA’s) people” allow the being represented and served by ignorant rabid rats the likes of aoc .. ‘da-fraud-squad or, like the rest of all of them old parasites and them senile clowns. All of these creeps need to get replaced for the very same reason one needs to change a baby’s diaper.

  2. What do you means”LOSES IT”? I thought that was foregone, already happened, been there done that, and she can’t lose more, can she?

  3. She called the ad, which targeted her socialist ideas, “violent,” “false,” and a “love letter to the GOP’s white supremacist case.”

    So, the add was “violent” Really? How so- it is an image dear, violence is a physical action. but what can we expect when she said yesterday all the images of 9/11 were triggering and initiates violence against “woman of color” i.e. her and the squad (because everything you know, is like about her!)

    “false” again How so? what in the ad was untrue dear- please be specific…

    And while she would like to believe the GOP is just chock full of “white supremacists” she needs to prove that and check her rhetoric- Or I will claim all DNC ads are love letters to the fascists Antifa hoodlums who have become the armed (brownshirts in black) of the Dem party!

    See dear, we can play this vile game of tossing out labels like spaghetti and hoping something will stick, but that is not how Republicans like to roll- If you have facts – Say them and prove your case – otherwise its just more AOC-BS


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here